General Reports Fragile Progress in Eastern Afghanistan

WASHINGTON, June 14, 2011 — Less than a month after return­ing from a one-year deploy­ment to Afghanistan as com­man­der of Joint Task Force 101 and Region­al Com­mand East, Army Maj. Gen. John F. Camp­bell report­ed con­tin­u­ing progress on mul­ti­ple fronts, but said more time is need­ed to ensure it will stick.
Camp­bell, com­man­der of the 101st Air­borne Divi­sion at Fort Camp­bell, Ky., told Pritzk­er Mil­i­tary Library Pres­i­dent and CEO Ed Tracey at the Chica­go library today he’s proud of the secu­ri­ty suc­cess­es his sol­diers helped pro­mote by pur­su­ing insur­gents and help­ing to build the Afghan nation­al secu­ri­ty forces.

“The Afghan army, the Afghan police, the Afghan bor­der police con­tin­ue to grow in their capac­i­ty and their capa­bil­i­ty,” he said.

Much of the task force’s work took place at the dis­trict lev­el, where the sol­diers focused on build­ing addi­tion­al capa­bil­i­ty with­in the police force and pro­mot­ing lead­er­ship and pro­fes­sion­al­ism among Afghan sol­diers.

Camp­bell cit­ed oth­er for­ward momen­tum dur­ing the past year in pro­mot­ing gov­er­nance, devel­op­ment and eco­nom­ic oppor­tu­ni­ty with­in Region­al Com­mand East. He cit­ed unprece­dent­ed coor­di­na­tion with more than 150 civil­ian pro­fes­sion­als there from the U.S. Agency for Inter­na­tion­al Devel­op­ment, and the State and Agri­cul­ture depart­ments.

Task Force 101 “made progress every sin­gle day,” Camp­bell said, while acknowl­edg­ing, “some days we took two steps for­ward and one step back.”

Camp­bell empha­sized the impor­tance of the coalition’s rela­tion­ship with Pak­istan, not­ing that he vis­it­ed Pak­istan five times dur­ing the deploy­ment and brought Pak­istan rep­re­sen­ta­tives to his head­quar­ters sev­er­al times.

“You can’t talk about Afghanistan with­out includ­ing Pak­istan in the equa­tion,” he said.

Strain between the Unit­ed States and Pak­istan over issues such as drones and the raid that killed Osama bin Laden haven’t ham­pered coop­er­a­tion on the ground, he report­ed. “At the tac­ti­cal and oper­a­tional lev­el, the rela­tion­ships that we had con­tin­ued to get bet­ter and bet­ter,” he said.

With the final surge forces arriv­ing in Afghanistan in August, Camp­bell said more time is need­ed to build on the coun­terin­sur­gency efforts under way and to ensure the progress being made will stick.

The gen­er­al acknowl­edged the chal­lenges his task force faced car­ry­ing out the mis­sion in a region that stretch­es 43,000 square miles and includes 450 miles of bor­der with Pak­istan. “We had to pri­or­i­tize,” he said. “We could­n’t be every­where all the time.”

In addi­tion to exten­sive dis­tances, troops in Afghanistan face addi­tion­al chal­lenges: insur­gent move­ments and attacks across the bor­der from Pak­istan, demand­ing ter­rain and weath­er con­di­tions, and cul­tur­al dif­fer­ences, among them.

Anoth­er chal­lenge -– one Camp­bell said remains trou­bling — is the threat of ene­my troops being able to infil­trate Afghan secu­ri­ty forces and launch attacks on coali­tion and Afghan forces.

This mix of chal­leng­ing con­di­tions cre­at­ed an envi­ron­ment “expo­nen­tial­ly hard­er than what I faced in Bagh­dad,” he said, refer­ring to his deploy­ment to Iraq as com­mand­ing gen­er­al for maneu­ver for the 1st Cav­al­ry Divi­sion and 4th Infantry Divi­sion.

Camp­bell expressed pride in his sol­diers’ dogged deter­mi­na­tion to suc­ceed in Afghanistan and in their abil­i­ty to forge and deep­en rela­tion­ships with the Afghan peo­ple.

Going into the deploy­ment, Camp­bell said he knew that more coali­tion and Afghan troops on the ground would mean more ene­my attacks against them. Yet while the num­ber of attacks did increase, he report­ed that their effec­tive­ness went down.

But “it was a very, very tough time,” he said, with the 101st los­ing 133 sol­diers, the most for the unit in any sin­gle deploy­ment since the Viet­nam War.

“Every sin­gle sol­dier is a trag­ic loss,” he said, pulling out a large stack of cards, each one with the name, pho­to and unit affil­i­a­tion of a sol­dier killed, along with fam­i­ly back­ground and cir­cum­stances of the death.

“I car­ried these cards every­where I went, in the back of my ruck­sack,” he said. “I did it as a way so I would nev­er ever for­get the great sac­ri­fice on the part of these sol­diers and their fam­i­lies,” and to be able to show them to oth­ers so they, too, would remem­ber.

Six addi­tion­al 101st sol­diers were killed since the gen­er­al returned to Fort Camp­bell in late May.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →