Gates Urges Careful Thought in Defense Spending Reductions

FORT LEONARD WOOD, Mo., May 19, 2011 — Find­ing $400 bil­lion in addi­tion­al defense spend­ing reduc­tions over the next 12 years will require care­ful thought that con­sid­ers the risks the reduc­tions cre­ate, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates said here today.

In a ques­tion-and-answer ses­sion with stu­dents at the U.S. Army Engi­neer School here, Gates warned against what he called the “man­age­r­i­al cow­ardice” of across-the-board cuts, advo­cat­ing instead an approach that retains excel­lence in the mis­sions the mil­i­tary keeps while cut­ting mis­sions and pro­grams that have val­ue but would pose an accept­able lev­el of risk if eliminated. 

“Our approach in the Depart­ment of Defense to deal­ing with the reduc­tions that peo­ple think we need to make needs to be very care­ful­ly thought through,” the sec­re­tary said. “My con­cern is that almost every­body in Wash­ing­ton sees this as a math prob­lem, as opposed to a strate­gic prob­lem. So I’m try­ing to frame the process in the Depart­ment of Defense so that we’ll con­tin­ue the effi­cien­cies that we began last year, and we’ll look at mar­gin­al mis­sions and capa­bil­i­ties for some of those that have val­ue, but are not core mis­sions for us.” 

Gates said “polit­i­cal­ly hard” issues such as mil­i­tary com­pen­sa­tion, retire­ment and health care costs, as well as base clo­sures, also need to be part of the discussion. 

“But I think the real issue,” he added, “is that if we’re going to take a big hit in the bud­get, I want pol­i­cy mak­ers [and] the polit­i­cal lead­er­ship of the coun­try to think of it in terms of ‘What addi­tion­al risk are you pre­pared to take?’ ” 

Pre­vi­ous large-scale defense spend­ing reduc­tions — in the 1970s after the Viet­nam War and in the 1990s after the Cold War — were tak­en across the board, Gates said, call­ing that approach “absolute­ly the worst way to deal with this.” 

“That is the way you hol­low out the mil­i­tary,” he said. “That is the way you end up with a force struc­ture that has­n’t changed, but you don’t have near­ly enough mon­ey for train­ing, for exer­cis­es, for tank miles, for steam­ing days or fly­ing hours, or enough bul­lets to shoot in basic [train­ing] to learn how.” 

The sec­re­tary not­ed that nation­al pol­i­cy for more than 20 years has been for the mil­i­tary to be able to fight two major region­al wars simultaneously. 

“One approach [to spend­ing reduc­tions],” Gates said, “would be to say the like­li­hood of that hap­pen­ing is fair­ly low, and there­fore, what are the impli­ca­tions if I think of it sequen­tial­ly instead of simul­ta­ne­ous­ly, where we won’t have to fight two at the same time? What are the impli­ca­tions of that for force struc­ture? How many [brigade com­bat teams] can you take out of the force, how many fight­ers can you take out of the force, and so on, if you’re only going to fight one war at a time?” 

But that approach, he said, also requires con­sid­er­ing the risk. 

“If you make that deci­sion and cut that force,” he said, “the ene­my always has a vote.” 

The sec­re­tary pre­sent­ed a hypo­thet­i­cal exam­ple in which the Unit­ed States is involved in a future con­flict in Korea. 

“Who’s to say that the Ira­ni­ans don’t say, ‘What a great oppor­tu­ni­ty — the Amer­i­cans are busy over here, let’s take advan­tage of the sit­u­a­tion?’ ” he asked the stu­dents rhetorically. 

“That’s the risk that’s involved,” he said. “So when peo­ple make these deci­sions, I don’t want them to treat it as a math prob­lem. I want them to under­stand that there are strate­gic and mil­i­tary con­se­quences to these bud­getary deci­sions, and they need to make con­scious choic­es about what capa­bil­i­ties and what risks they’re will­ing to deal with.” 

Gates said he wants to make the process hard, because it’s always polit­i­cal­ly expe­di­ent to impose across-the-board per­cent­age cuts when faced with the need for spend­ing reduc­tions. “If we’re going to cut the bud­get,” he said, “we need to make some very hard, con­scious decisions.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →