Gates Reveals Budget Efficiencies, Reinvestment Possibilities

WASHINGTON, Jan. 6, 2011 — The Defense Depart­ment has found $154 bil­lion in effi­cien­cies over the next five years and will be able to invest $70 bil­lion of that saved mon­ey in more deserv­ing accounts, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates said today.
The sec­re­tary announced the sav­ings and rein­vest­ing of the effi­cien­cies dur­ing a Pen­ta­gon news con­fer­ence.

Gates empha­sized that the nation is at war and faces a range of future secu­ri­ty threats. “It is impor­tant to not repeat the mis­takes of the past by mak­ing dras­tic and ill-con­ceived cuts to the over­all defense bud­get,” he said. “At the same time, it is imper­a­tive for this depart­ment to elim­i­nate waste­ful, exces­sive and unneed­ed spending.” 

Gates said he wants every dol­lar invest­ed in defense spent in the smartest man­ner. The effi­cien­cies con­tin­ue a process to reshape and re-bal­ance the defense bud­get that has already saved the nation $300 bil­lion, he noted. 

The sec­re­tary announced effi­cien­cies in mod­ern­iza­tion accounts. He said he agrees with the Navy and Marine Corps rec­om­men­da­tion to can­cel the expe­di­tionary fight­ing vehi­cle pro­gram, which already has con­sumed $3 bil­lion to devel­op and would require anoth­er $12 bil­lion to build. 

Gates said he also will restruc­ture the F‑35 joint strike fight­er pro­gram. The Air Force and Navy vari­ants of the fight­er are on sched­ule, but the short take-off and land­ing vari­ant is expe­ri­enc­ing sig­nif­i­cant test­ing problems. 

“As a result, I am plac­ing the STOVL vari­ant on the equiv­a­lent of a two-year pro­ba­tion,” Gates said. “If we can­not fix this vari­ant dur­ing this time frame and get it back on track in terms of per­for­mance, cost and sched­ule, then I believe it should be cancelled.” 

The sec­re­tary said he also wants changes to the military’s TRICARE med­ical pro­gram, not­ing that fees have not risen since the pro­gram was intro­duced in 1995. He said he will pro­pose mod­est increas­es to fees for work­ing-age mil­i­tary retirees. 

These changes also will be part of the fis­cal 2012 bud­get request. The Army will can­cel pro­cure­ment of the SLAMRAAM sur­face-to air-mis­sile and the non-line-of-sight launch sys­tem. The effi­cien­cies will change the way the depart­ment uses infor­ma­tion tech­nol­o­gy, con­sol­i­dat­ing hun­dreds of infor­ma­tion tech­nol­o­gy cen­ters to save more than $1 bil­lion a year, Gates said. 

“At the same time,” he added, “I am not sat­is­fied with the progress we have made in this area since August, and expect to make a fol­low-on announce­ment with a spe­cif­ic plan of action by next month.” 

The effi­cien­cies will cut the num­ber of con­trac­tors. “Over­all, we will cut the size of the staff sup­port con­trac­tor cadre by 10 per­cent per year for three years and real­ize near­ly $3 bil­lion in total sav­ings,” the sec­re­tary said. 

A third effi­cien­cy will trim the size of the defense work force and place more in areas with the most press­ing need, he said. This should yield $4 bil­lion in sav­ings, he added. Gates is also said he’s ini­ti­at­ing changes in the defense intel­li­gence appa­ra­tus, and will elim­i­nate or down­grade gen­er­al and flag offi­cer posi­tions. He will also elim­i­nate or down­grade 200 senior exec­u­tive positions. 

The effi­cien­cies will elim­i­nate the Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense for Net­work Intel­li­gence and Infor­ma­tion, the Busi­ness Trans­for­ma­tion Agency and the U.S. Joint Forces Com­mand, Gates said, though rough­ly 50 per­cent of Joint Forces Com­mand will sur­vive and be assigned to oth­er organizations. 

In April, Gates instruct­ed the ser­vices to find at least $100 bil­lion over five years in over­head sav­ings that they could keep and shift to high­er-pri­or­i­ty pro­grams. They have done so. In addi­tion, defense agen­cies have found $54 bil­lion in pos­si­ble efficiencies. 

Air Force lead­ers have pro­posed effi­cien­cies that will total $34 bil­lion over five years. The Army has pro­posed $29 bil­lion in sav­ings, and the Navy looks to sav­ings of $35 bil­lion over five years. 

Of the $100 bil­lion in sav­ings, the ser­vices will use about $28 bil­lion to deal with high­er-than-expect­ed oper­at­ing expens­es. These costs include health care, pay and hous­ing allowances, sus­tain­ment of weapons sys­tems, depot main­te­nance, base sup­port and flight hours and oth­er training. 

“Frankly, using the sav­ings in this way was not my orig­i­nal intent or pref­er­ence,” Gates said, “but we have lit­tle choice but to deal with these so-called ‘must-pay’ bills –- and bet­ter to con­front them hon­est­ly now than through raid­ing invest­ment accounts later.” 

But this still leaves the ser­vices with $70 bil­lion to rein­vest in high­er pri­or­i­ty sys­tems. In the Air Force, this will mean the ser­vice can buy more Reaper unmanned aer­i­al vehi­cles and enable the ser­vice to move this capa­bil­i­ty from the war bud­get to the base bud­get. It will also allow the ser­vice to increase pro­cure­ment of the evolved expend­able launch vehi­cle and to mod­ern­ize radars aboard the F‑15 Eagle to keep the fight­er jet fly­ing and fight­ing longer. 

The Air Force also will be able to invest in devel­op­ment of a long-range, nuclear-capa­ble bomber. 

The Army will invest in sol­diers by improv­ing sui­cide-pre­ven­tion and sub­stance-abuse coun­sel­ing. The ser­vice will also mod­ern­ize its bat­tle fleets of Abrams tanks, Bradley fight­ing vehi­cles and Stryk­er wheeled vehi­cles. The ser­vice also will accel­er­ate field­ing of the newest tac­ti­cal com­mu­ni­ca­tions net­work and will invest in more unmanned aer­i­al vehi­cles and a new unmanned helicopter. 

The Navy will accel­er­ate pro­cure­ment of elec­tron­ic jam­ming gear and fund refur­bish­ment of Marine Corps equip­ment. The ser­vice is also look­ing to devel­op a new gen­er­a­tion of sea-borne unmanned strike and sur­veil­lance air­craft, and to buy more F‑18 Super Hor­nets. The Navy also will be able to buy more ships, includ­ing a destroy­er, a lit­toral com­bat ship and fleet oilers. 

Gates stressed the need to make cuts care­ful­ly and judiciously. 

“To main­tain the kind of mil­i­tary need­ed for America’s lead­er­ship role requires not only ade­quate lev­els of fund­ing, but also fun­da­men­tal­ly chang­ing the way our defense estab­lish­ment spends mon­ey and does busi­ness,” Gates said. “That is why it is so impor­tant to fol­low through on the pro­gram of reform and over­head reduction. 

“This depart­ment sim­ply can­not risk con­tin­u­ing down the same path -– where our invest­ment pri­or­i­ties, bureau­crat­ic habits and lax atti­tude towards costs are increas­ing­ly divorced from the real threats of today, the grow­ing per­ils of tomor­row and the nation’s grim finan­cial out­look,” he added. 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →