Gates Hopes Taliban Think U.S. Will Leave Afghanistan

MELBOURNE, Aus­tralia, Nov. 8, 2010 — Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates said here today that he hopes the Tal­iban think July of next year is an end date for U.S. and NATO oper­a­tions in Afghanistan.

“It’s not,” Gates said dur­ing a round­table with Aus­tralian and Amer­i­can reporters at the Aus­tralia-Unit­ed States Min­is­te­r­i­al Con­sul­ta­tions. “They’re going to be very sur­prised come August, Sep­tem­ber, Octo­ber and Novem­ber, when most Amer­i­can forces are still there, and still com­ing after them.” 

Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s plan for July is to begin hand­ing over secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty to the Afghans, based on con­di­tions in any giv­en area. The tran­si­tion of secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ties to Afghan secu­ri­ty forces will be a years-long process, Gates said, not­ing that NATO heads of gov­ern­ment will dis­cuss the tran­si­tion at the alliance’s sum­mit meet­ing in Lis­bon, Por­tu­gal, lat­er this month. 

“One of the agen­da items for the Lis­bon sum­mit is to embrace [Afghan] Pres­i­dent [Hamid] Karzai’s goal of com­plet­ing the trans­fer of secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty to Afghanistan by 2014,” the sec­re­tary said. “So I think that’s the kind of time frame we’re look­ing at.” 

But even that won’t be the end of U.S. and world­wide engage­ment in Afghanistan, Gates said. “We’re going to remain a part­ner of Afghanistan even after our troops are gone,” he told the reporters. “We walked away from Afghanistan in 1988, and we saw the con­se­quences of that in 2001.” 

Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, also par­tic­i­pat­ed in the round­table dis­cus­sion and said help­ing Pak­istan also is a pri­or­i­ty in the area, not­ing that the bor­der area between Afghanistan and Pak­istan is still the “epi­cen­ter of ter­ror­ism in the world.” 

The Unit­ed States must con­tin­ue to engage with Pak­istan and must work to rebuild trust with the lead­ers, the chair­man said. That, too, is a long-range project, he added. 

“It’s going to take time, and we’d like it to move more quick­ly,” Mullen said. “We con­tin­ue to sup­port them in train­ing and to work toward a strate­gic part­ner­ship. In the long run, that solves the prob­lem of Pak­istan not con­tin­u­ing as a safe haven.” 

The Unit­ed States and its inter­na­tion­al part­ners will help Afghanistan with devel­op­ment, train­ing, equip­ment and so on, Gates said, and the bal­ance between secu­ri­ty and devel­op­ment will change as the secu­ri­ty sit­u­a­tion in the coun­try improves. Secu­ri­ty needs are para­mount now, the sec­re­tary said, but over time that will improve and the Afghan gov­ern­ment, aid­ed by civil­ian agen­cies, will be the pri­ma­ry means of engage­ment. “We don’t see this as a rela­tion­ship that ends when the secu­ri­ty tran­si­tion is com­plet­ed,” he said. 

The 2014 date for secu­ri­ty tran­si­tion is real­is­tic, both Gates and Mullen said. “There’s an awful lot that has been fleshed out,” the chair­man said. “We’ve accom­plished a lot in train­ing the Afghan secu­ri­ty forces over the last year in terms of their struc­ture, their train­ing, their cur­ricu­lum, etc.” 

Gates stressed that any deci­sion about where Afghans take the lead and where NATO forces can thin out will be based on con­di­tions. Com­man­ders in Afghanistan will make their rec­om­men­da­tions. Civil­ian lead­ers in the alliance and with part­ner coun­tries such as Aus­tralia will review those rec­om­men­da­tions. Final­ly, the Afghan gov­ern­ment itself will exam­ine the rec­om­men­da­tions and make an assess­ment as to whether the forces have the capa­bil­i­ty to ensure secu­ri­ty, the sec­re­tary explained. 

“I would­n’t be sur­prised if there are some rec­om­men­da­tions as ear­ly as next spring, in terms of dis­tricts or provinces, that might be can­di­dates for tran­si­tion to Afghan secu­ri­ty at that time,” Gates said. 

Secu­ri­ty, gov­er­nance and Afghan civil­ian capac­i­ty are three major areas that will be mea­sured as the tran­si­tion process moves along. Pri­ma­ry among these is the secu­ri­ty sit­u­a­tion and the abil­i­ty of the Afghan nation­al secu­ri­ty forces – includ­ing local police – to main­tain security. 

The sec­re­tary said offi­cials chose the word “tran­si­tion” for the process very carefully. 

“When the debate began a year ago on this, we used the word trans­fer,” he said. “But trans­fer con­not­ed that, ‘Today you have all this sup­port struc­ture, includ­ing all our troops and such – and tomor­row you have nothing.’ ” 

Tran­si­tion describes a more grad­ual approach, he said. “You will see a thin­ning of the for­eign forces in a dis­trict or province so there is a bit of a safe­ty net under the Afghans as they take charge,” the sec­re­tary said. “I think this makes a lot sense.” 

Aus­tralia has 1,550 troops in Afghanistan, most­ly in Oruz­gun province in Region­al Com­mand South – a hot area. Aus­tralia has lost 21 ser­vice­mem­bers in the coun­try. U.S. and Aus­tralian troops are again work­ing side by side in the province, and that was a mat­ter of dis­cus­sion dur­ing the min­is­te­r­i­al meetings. 

“We dis­cussed Afghanistan, and we are very pleased with the way Aus­tralia and the Unit­ed States are com­bin­ing and oper­at­ing very well on the ground in Oruz­gun province,” Aus­tralian Defense Min­is­ter Steven Smith said dur­ing a news con­fer­ence at Gov­ern­ment House here. 

The U.S. and Aus­tralian lead­ers said they agreed the strat­e­gy in Afghanistan is work­ing. All said that although Afghanistan is chal­leng­ing, there is progress. The strat­e­gy takes patience, they emphasized. 

The end game in Afghanistan must involve some degree of rec­on­cil­i­a­tion between the Afghan gov­ern­ment and the Tal­iban, Gates said. 

“It must be on the terms that the Afghan gov­ern­ment can accept,” he said. “My per­son­al opin­ion is that the Tal­iban need to clear­ly see that the prospects for suc­cess have dimin­ished dra­mat­i­cal­ly, and that they will lose, for them … to engage in rec­on­cil­i­a­tion. It would be dif­fi­cult to achieve those cir­cum­stances before next spring.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →