Gates Details Efforts to Change Pentagon Culture

WASHINGTON, June 23, 2011 — When he first took office, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates had no inten­tion of chang­ing the cul­ture of the Defense Depart­ment. He was focused almost exclu­sive­ly on the war in Iraq.
Dur­ing his two years with the Bush admin­is­tra­tion, he did tee up “broad­er issues that need­ed to be addressed by my suc­ces­sor, and punt­ed those to my suc­ces­sor,” Gates recalled. But he found him­self on the receiv­ing end of those punts, he said, when Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma asked him to stay on as defense sec­re­tary.

“The major, more dra­mat­ic steps that I took dur­ing the first term that went after the insti­tu­tion were real­ly to just try and get things to the troops,” Gates said.

This start­ed with the wound­ed war­rior issue at Wal­ter Reed Army Med­ical Cen­ter here and then the mine-resis­tant, ambush-pro­tect­ed vehi­cles need­ed to pro­tect deployed troops from road­side bombs. He also pushed to improve bat­tle­field med­ical evac­u­a­tion and to get more intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance capa­bil­i­ties into the com­bat the­ater.

“But I became increas­ing­ly frus­trat­ed dur­ing that peri­od with the inabil­i­ty to get any of those things done with­in the usu­al orga­ni­za­tion,” the sec­re­tary said. He began think­ing about what need­ed to be fixed, how to build more agili­ty in the sys­tem, how to make peo­ple more real­is­tic, and how to impose more dis­ci­pline in what the depart­ment buys.

“So that real­ly teed up the agen­da, once I was giv­en renewed lease to begin tack­ling these broad­er issues,” he said.

So he went after the cul­ture in the Pen­ta­gon, par­tic­u­lar­ly the part of it that devel­oped over 10 years of hav­ing an open check­book.

“I knew it was going to slam shut, because we already in 2008 were in eco­nom­ic cri­sis, and it seemed evi­dent to me that there were going to be pres­sures on the defense bud­get,” Gates said. “It seemed to me that in order to pre­serve the mon­ey for cur­rent needs and future mod­ern­iza­tion, we had to be very dis­ci­plined about look­ing at the pro­grams that we had.”

Again, it began with ques­tions: Are these pro­grams work­ing? Did they have any prospect of work­ing? Did the orig­i­nal con­cept of how to use them make sense any longer? Could they be sus­tained?

“That led to the 33 ini­tia­tives in April 2009,” the sec­re­tary said. “Next, it was, how can we begin to reduce over­head and be more dis­ci­plined in our spend­ing to ensure that the tooth part of the Pen­ta­gon got the 2 to 3 per­cent real growth that it absolute­ly requires?”

When Oba­ma hand­ed down direc­tion for the Pen­ta­gon to find $400 bil­lion in sav­ings over 12 years, it caused fur­ther soul search­ing in the build­ing. Gates wants these cuts done very specif­i­cal­ly with the real­iza­tion by all par­ties that “sala­mi cut­ting” — per­cent­age cuts across all activ­i­ties — would mean hol­low­ing out the force.

Gates ordered a com­pre­hen­sive review of the depart­ment to find these cuts in the least dam­ag­ing way. He said that any cuts involve trade­offs between accept­able risks and defense capa­bil­i­ties that could be sac­ri­ficed.

“I am deter­mined that we will not repeat what we did in the 1970s and, to a less­er extent, in the 1990s, which is across-the-board cuts that end up hol­low­ing out the force,” he said.

Chang­ing the cul­ture con­tin­ued by cre­at­ing a new process for input from the ser­vices and com­bat­ant com­man­ders, Gates said. He moved away from a semi­an­nu­al meet­ing of defense lead­ers to more fre­quent dis­cus­sions.

“The com­bat­ant com­man­ders believed their con­cerns were not paid atten­tion to by the ser­vices,” he said. “The key here was to bring the team togeth­er and get on the same page with the senior civil­ians and all the senior mil­i­tary lead­er­ship — not just the chiefs, but the com­bat­ant com­man­ders — so all had an under­stand­ing of what we had to do and why we had to do it.”

Their reg­u­lar involve­ment in the process changed the dynam­ic inside the build­ing, the sec­re­tary said. “They had input into the process reg­u­lar­ly,” he said, “and I think that’s one of the rea­sons the inter­nal dis­ci­pline was so extra­or­di­nary dur­ing this peri­od.”

It was high­ly unusu­al when Gates had all senior lead­ers involved in fis­cal dis­cus­sions sign nondis­clo­sure agree­ments in the spring of 2009. “But the truth is I nev­er had to have them sign them after that,” he said. “They under­stood that we were all in this togeth­er, but they being involved in the process and know­ing they had a way to make their views heard con­tributed.

“If there has been a cul­tur­al change,” he added, “it has been the inter­nal cohe­sion across the ser­vices and between the uni­forms and the civil­ians as we move this for­ward that is real­ly quite pro­found.”

Account­abil­i­ty is anoth­er hall­mark of Gates’ tenure in the Pen­ta­gon. When con­di­tions for wound­ed war­riors at Wal­ter Reed Army Med­ical Cen­ter shocked Amer­i­ca, Gates relieved the Army sec­re­tary, the Army sur­geon gen­er­al and the hos­pi­tal com­man­der. When an Air Force B‑52 mis­tak­en­ly car­ried nuclear weapons from Minot Air Force Base, N.D., to Barks­dale Air Force Base, La., he relieved the Air Force sec­re­tary and chief of staff.

“It’s pret­ty rare any­where in Wash­ing­ton for some­one at a senior lev­el to be held account­able and to be held respon­si­ble, because they rarely lost their jobs,” the sec­re­tary said. “It cer­tain­ly got everybody’s atten­tion at a senior lev­el.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →