EU/Iran/Haiti/Chile/Afghanistan/Middle East

  • FREEDOM OF ACCESS TO INFORMATION IN IRAN
  • EU POSITION FOR THE NEW YORK INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HAITI
  • CHILE
  • AFGHANISTAN
  • MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS
  • OTHER BUSINESS

{mospage­break heading=Foreign Affairs&title= — FREEDOM OF ACCESS TO INFORMATION IN IRAN}

FREEDOM OF ACCESS TO INFORMATION IN IRAN

The Coun­cil adopt­ed a dec­la­ra­tion on free­dom of access to infor­ma­tion in Iran, call­ing on the Iran­ian author­i­ties to halt the jam­ming of satel­lite broad­cast­ing, Inter­net cen­sor­ship and inter­fer­ence with mobile telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions.

“1. Recall­ing its con­clu­sions of Decem­ber 2009 on human rights and democ­ra­ti­sa­tion in third coun­tries, the Coun­cil reit­er­ates its com­mit­ment to step­ping up EU action on the rela­tion­ship between free­dom of expres­sion and new tech­nolo­gies. The EU stress­es that free­dom of expres­sion through­out the world is a uni­ver­sal right which includes the right of indi­vid­u­als to seek, receive and impart infor­ma­tion regard­less of fron­tiers. Restric­tions and lim­i­ta­tions on the use of new tech­nolo­gies have emerged as a key chal­lenge to the respect for human rights in many parts of the world, under­min­ing the poten­tial the tech­nolo­gies have in pro­mot­ing free­dom of expres­sion.

2. In this con­text, the Euro­pean Union express­es its grave con­cern over mea­sures tak­en by the Iran­ian author­i­ties to pre­vent its cit­i­zens from freely com­mu­ni­cat­ing and receiv­ing infor­ma­tion through TV, radio satel­lite broad­cast­ing and the inter­net. Delib­er­ate inter­fer­ence by jam­ming of satel­lite broad­cast­ing has affect­ed numer­ous radio and TV ser­vices, includ­ing Euro­pean ser­vices, trans­mit­ted by EUTELSAT. In addi­tion, the Iran­ian author­i­ties reg­u­lar­ly pre­vent their cit­i­zens from freely access­ing, com­mu­ni­cat­ing and receiv­ing infor­ma­tion on the inter­net, and restrict or block mobile telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions.

3. The jam­ming of TV and radio satel­lite broad­cast­ing runs counter to the under­tak­ings giv­en by the Islam­ic Repub­lic of Iran itself in the con­text of the Inter­na­tion­al Telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions Union (ITU). Despite com­plaints made to the Iran­ian author­i­ties through the ITU they have not put an end to this jam­ming, which orig­i­nates on Iran­ian ter­ri­to­ry.

4. The EU there­fore calls on the Iran­ian author­i­ties to stop the jam­ming of satel­lite broad­cast­ing and inter­net cen­sor­ship and to put an end to this elec­tron­ic inter­fer­ence imme­di­ate­ly. The EU is deter­mined to pur­sue these issues and to act with a view to putting an end to this unac­cept­able sit­u­a­tion.

5. The EU calls on Iran to ensure the right to free­dom of expres­sion as set out in the Inter­na­tion­al Covenant on Civ­il and Polit­i­cal Rights that the Islam­ic Repub­lic of Iran has signed and rat­i­fied.”

Source:
Euro­pean Coun­cil

{mospage­break heading=Foreign Affairs&title= — EU POSITION ON HAITI}

EU POSITION FOR THE NEW YORK INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HAITI

The Coun­cil was briefed by the High Rep­re­sen­ta­tive and the Com­mis­sion­er for Inter­na­tion­al Coop­er­a­tion, Human­i­tar­i­an Aid and Cri­sis Response, Kristali­na Georgie­va. on their vis­it to Haiti on 2 and 3 March. It man­dat­ed the High Rep­re­sen­ta­tive to rep­re­sent the Union at the Inter­na­tion­al Donors’ Con­fer­ence – Towards a New Future for Haiti in New York – on 31 March and present a com­mon EU posi­tion pro­vid­ing an overview of the EU’s col­lec­tive effort and its sup­port for Haiti’s long-term recon­struc­tion and devel­op­ment.

It adopt­ed the fol­low­ing con­clu­sions:

“1. The Coun­cil express­es its sup­port for the peo­ple of Haiti fol­low­ing the earth­quake and under­lines their own­er­ship and cen­tral respon­si­bil­i­ty for deter­min­ing their cur­rent and future pri­or­i­ties. Build­ing on its swift and effec­tive ini­tial response the Euro­pean Union will con­tin­ue to assist them in address­ing their human­i­tar­i­an needs, includ­ing putting in place con­tin­gency mea­sures in view of the upcom­ing rainy and hur­ri­cane sea­sons. Look­ing fur­ther ahead, the Euro­pean Union stands ready to sup­port a long-term plan over the next decade, led by the Gov­ern­ment of Haiti, and in part­ner­ship with the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty, to sup­port recon­struc­tion and sus­tain­able devel­op­ment in Haiti.

2. The Coun­cil sup­ports the Gov­ern­ment of Haiti’s lead­er­ship with regard to recov­ery and recon­struc­tion efforts and wel­comes its inten­tion to present its “Plan d’ac­tion pour le relève­ment et le développe­ment nation­al : les grands chantiers pour l’avenir” at the Inter­na­tion­al Donors’ Con­fer­ence Towards a New Future for Haiti in New York on 31 March 2010.

3. The High Rep­re­sen­ta­tive will rep­re­sent the Euro­pean Union in New York and set forth a com­mon EU posi­tion with the fol­low­ing ele­ments:

a) An overview over the EU’s col­lec­tive effort in pro­vid­ing human­i­tar­i­an, civ­il pro­tec­tion and oth­er emer­gency assis­tance since the earth­quake, includ­ing mil­i­tary assets, and police sup­port;
b) The expres­sions of sol­i­dar­i­ty com­ing from Euro­pean cit­i­zens and civ­il soci­ety;
c) A com­mon aggre­gat­ed fig­ure rep­re­sent­ing the over­all EU com­mit­ment to the recon­struc­tion of Haiti;
d) Sup­port for a long-term plan that pro­vides the basis for last­ing inclu­sive eco­nom­ic growth and devel­op­ment in Haiti in the con­text of a joint EU approach link­ing relief to reha­bil­i­ta­tion and devel­op­ment, under­pinned by a com­mit­ment to joint pro­gram­ming to enhance aid effec­tive­ness and pro­mote an effec­tive divi­sion of labour;
e) An EU House in Haiti, where EU devel­op­ment capa­bil­i­ties could be co-locat­ed, to enhance EU coor­di­na­tion on the ground and sup­port joint pro­gram­ming and to assist EU donors not present in Haiti.

4. The Coun­cil under­lines the lead­er­ship of the Gov­ern­ment of Haiti in donor coor­di­na­tion, sec­tor coor­di­na­tion, and man­age­ment of the over­all recon­struc­tion agen­da and the impor­tance of demo­c­ra­t­ic gov­er­nance. It also stress­es the need to ensure ade­quate coor­di­na­tion with the UN, as well as with the World Bank, the Inter-Amer­i­can Devel­op­ment Bank, key bilat­er­al donors, and oth­er stake­hold­ers includ­ing region­al actors, in par­tic­u­lar through an over­ar­ch­ing coun­try-led gov­er­nance mech­a­nism which also offers a forum for pol­i­cy dia­logue, donor coor­di­na­tion and con­sul­ta­tion with the Hait­ian civ­il soci­ety.

5. The EU wel­comes the con­sid­er­a­tion of imple­men­ta­tion modal­i­ties such as a mul­ti-donor trust fund to ensure sup­port for long-term devel­op­ment pri­or­i­ties and ensure bet­ter coher­ence. Linked to its joint pro­gram­ming exer­cise, the EU will define its par­tic­i­pa­tion in dif­fer­ent imple­men­ta­tion bod­ies, based on an assess­ment of their effec­tive­ness.

6. In the light of the com­mit­ment to joint pro­gram­ming referred to in para­graph 3(d), the Coun­cil wel­comes the prepa­ra­tion of a joint EU Coun­try Strat­e­gy Paper and a joint aid plan­ning doc­u­ment for the EU1 in order to per­mit the effec­tive coor­di­na­tion of Com­mu­ni­ty devel­op­ment funds and those of the Mem­ber States con­tribut­ing to the effort to reha­bil­i­tate Haiti. These will be drawn up after the New York Con­fer­ence on the basis of the Gov­ern­ment of Haiti “Plan d’ac­tion pour le relève­ment et le développe­ment nation­al : les grands chantiers pour l’avenir,” under­pinned by the full Post-Dis­as­ter Needs Assess­ment, in con­sul­ta­tion with the Gov­ern­ment of Haiti and rel­e­vant stake­hold­ers.

* * *

The Coun­cil wel­comes the inten­tion of the High Rep­re­sen­ta­tive and the Com­mis­sion to review the Union’s emer­gency response capa­bil­i­ty and to report back to the Coun­cil, tak­ing into account ongo­ing eval­u­a­tions as well as lessons learned from the com­pre­hen­sive EU response to the Haiti earth­quake.”

Source:
Euro­pean Coun­cil

{mospage­break heading=Foreign Affairs&title= — CHILE}

CHILE

The Coun­cil was briefed by the Com­mis­sion­er for Inter­na­tion­al Coop­er­a­tion, Human­i­tar­i­an Aid and Cri­sis Response, Kristali­na Georgie­va, on the EU’s response to the earth­quake and the tsuna­mi in Chile and on her vis­it there. The Coun­cil had a short dis­cus­sion, under­lin­ing that the EU’s response had been speedy and com­pre­hen­sive and that it was already look­ing ahead to sup­port for long-term recon­struc­tion. It request­ed the Euro­pean Invest­ment Bank to do like­wise.

Source:
Euro­pean Coun­cil

{mospage­break heading=Foreign Affairs&title= — AFGHANISTAN}

AFGHANISTAN

The Coun­cil dis­cussed devel­op­ments in Afghanistan and EU efforts on the ground on the basis of the EU’s 2009 Action Plan for Enhanced Engage­ment in Afghanistan and Pak­istan in the pres­ence of the EU’s new sin­gle rep­re­sen­ta­tive for Afghanistan, Mr Vygau­das Usackas. It adopt­ed the fol­low­ing con­clu­sions:

“1.) The Coun­cil dis­cussed devel­op­ments in Afghanistan and EU efforts on the ground on the basis of the Action Plan for Enhanced EU Engage­ment in Afghanistan and Pak­istan, adopt­ed in Octo­ber 2009. The dis­cus­sion took place in the pres­ence of Mr. Vygau­das USACKAS, who today was appoint­ed as sin­gle rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the EU in Afghanistan, tak­ing up office from 1 April 2010. His appoint­ment as both the Spe­cial Rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the EU and Head of the EU Del­e­ga­tion in Kab­ul is a fur­ther step to strength­en coor­di­nat­ed EU action on the ground, work­ing in close coop­er­a­tion with oth­er inter­na­tion­al actors. EU efforts will be spear­head­ed under Mr. Usackas’ lead­er­ship, who will guide the imple­men­ta­tion of the Action Plan, in close coop­er­a­tion with Mem­ber States’ rep­re­sen­ta­tives in Kab­ul. The Coun­cil expressed sin­cere appre­ci­a­tion to out­go­ing EU Spe­cial Rep­re­sen­ta­tive, Ettore Sequi, and out­go­ing Head of the EU Del­e­ga­tion, Han­sjörg Kretschmer, for their out­stand­ing work over the past years.

2.) The Coun­cil reit­er­at­ed that the inter­nal secu­ri­ty sit­u­a­tion remained a direct chal­lenge to the sta­bil­i­ty of Afghanistan. The Coun­cil under­lined its con­tin­ued sup­port for inter­na­tion­al civil­ian efforts in Afghanistan, empha­sis­ing the cen­tral coor­di­na­tion role of UNAMA and reaf­firm­ing its sup­port for the UN man­date and the objec­tives of ISAF. The key to deliv­er­ing the civil­ian efforts will be enhanced coor­di­na­tion and the devel­op­ment of a coher­ent approach between all major civil­ian actors, notably the EU Spe­cial Rep­re­sen­ta­tive, the Spe­cial Rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the UN Sec­re­tary Gen­er­al and the NATO Senior Civil­ian Rep­re­sen­ta­tive, under the lead­er­ship of the Gov­ern­ment of Afghanistan. The Coun­cil under­lined the impor­tance of Afghan own­er­ship and lead­er­ship.

3.) The Coun­cil empha­sised its sup­port for the out­comes of the Lon­don Con­fer­ence of 28 Jan­u­ary 2010 and reit­er­at­ed that all efforts must now focus on imple­ment­ing the com­mit­ments made there, includ­ing with regards to the announced Peace and Rein­te­gra­tion Trust Fund to finance the Afghan-led Peace and Rein­te­gra­tion Pro­gramme. The Coun­cil under­lined the sig­nif­i­cance of bal­anced, Afghan-led rec­on­cil­i­a­tion and rein­te­gra­tion process­es as key ele­ments of a sus­tain­able polit­i­cal solu­tion in Afghanistan. In this respect, the Coun­cil wel­comed the organ­i­sa­tion of a Peace Jir­ga, sched­uled to take place this Spring. The Coun­cil also wel­comed recent con­tacts between lead­ers in the region aimed at con­fi­dence build­ing. It looks for­ward to a sec­ond suc­cess­ful ad hoc Sum­mit between the EU and Pak­istan on 21 April 2010.

4.) The Coun­cil dis­cussed the Kab­ul Con­fer­ence, which should fol­low up the com­mit­ments made in Lon­don. The Kab­ul Con­fer­ence will pro­vide an oppor­tu­ni­ty for the Afghan Gov­ern­ment to chart the way for­ward, notably on anti-cor­rup­tion, rein­forced secu­ri­ty, effec­tive and impar­tial gov­er­nance, eco­nom­ic and social devel­op­ment, human rights and improved elec­toral process­es. The EU expects that the Gov­ern­ment of Afghanistan will act swift­ly and deci­sive­ly to deliv­er on the promis­es made to its peo­ple. Through its Action Plan, the Euro­pean Union in coop­er­a­tion with UNAMA and oth­er inter­na­tion­al part­ners, con­tin­ues to pro­vide long-term assis­tance to Afghanistan in insti­tu­tion build­ing and civil­ian capac­i­ty pro­grammes, includ­ing at sub-nation­al lev­el. The Coun­cil expects to dis­cuss a first report on the progress of imple­men­ta­tion of the Action Plan next month.

5.) The Coun­cil stressed the impor­tance of cred­i­ble, inclu­sive and secure par­lia­men­tary elec­tions in Afghanistan reflect­ing the will of the peo­ple. Recall­ing the rec­om­men­da­tions of the EU Elec­tion Obser­va­tion Mis­sion to the Pres­i­den­tial Elec­tions of 2009 and the com­mit­ments made at the Lon­don Con­fer­ence to ensure the integri­ty of the elec­tions, the Coun­cil urged the Gov­ern­ment of Afghanistan to pro­ceed with­out fur­ther delay with reforms to the elec­toral process to safe­guard the impar­tial­i­ty, inde­pen­dence and integri­ty of the elec­toral insti­tu­tions, notably the Inde­pen­dent Elec­tion Com­mis­sion and the Elec­toral Com­plaints Com­mis­sion, in close coop­er­a­tion with the SRSG of the UN. The Coun­cil empha­sised that only struc­tur­al reforms will make any sup­port extend­ed to the elec­toral process by the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty ful­ly effec­tive. The Coun­cil will con­tin­ue to close­ly fol­low prepa­ra­tions for the upcom­ing par­lia­men­tary elec­tions.”

Source:
Euro­pean Coun­cil

{mospage­break heading=Foreign Affairs&title= — MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS}

MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS

Over lunch, the Coun­cil dis­cussed the Mid­dle East Peace Process in the pres­ence of the Inter­na­tion­al Quar­tet Envoy, Tony Blair. The High Rep­re­sen­ta­tive report­ed on her vis­it to the Mid­dle East and the Inter­na­tion­al Quar­tet meet­ing in Moscow and the Quar­tet Envoy briefed min­is­ters on the sit­u­a­tion and efforts on the ground.

EUROPEAN EXTERNAL ACTION SERVICE The Coun­cil in a joint ses­sion (Gen­er­al Affairs/Foreign Affairs) dis­cuss­es cur­rent work on the future Euro­pean Exter­nal Action Ser­vice (see press release 7802/10).

Source:
Euro­pean Coun­cil

{mospage­break heading=Foreign Affairs&title= — OTHER BUSINESS}

OTHER BUSINESS

• The Coun­cil held an exchange of views on Ukraine and the main lines of EU engage­ment, includ­ing the pack­age of mea­sures that the EU could offer Ukraine in return for imple­ment­ing inter­nal reforms, for exam­ple a roadmap towards a visa-free regime.

• The Coun­cil had a short dis­cus­sion on the Repub­lic of Moldo­va, relat­ing to macro-finan­cial assis­tance, the launch of a visa dia­logue and nego­ti­a­tions on a Deep and Com­pre­hen­sive Free Trade Area (DCFTA).

• The Coun­cil had an exchange of views on the bilat­er­al dis­pute between Libya and Switzer­land and the medi­a­tion efforts being led by Ger­many and Spain.

• The Coun­cil was briefed by the Sloven­ian For­eign Min­is­ter on the Brdo Con­fer­ence on the West­ern Balka­ns on 20 March.

Source:
Euro­pean Coun­cil

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →