EU — Seventh meeting with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

Sev­enth meet­ing of the Sta­bil­i­sa­tion and Asso­ci­a­tion Coun­cil between the for­mer Yugoslav Repub­lic of Mace­do­nia and the EU

Brus­sels, 27 July 2010 — JOINT PRESS RELEASE
The Sta­bil­i­sa­tion and Asso­ci­a­tion Coun­cil between the for­mer Yugoslav Repub­lic of Mace­do­nia and the EU (SA Coun­cil) held its sev­enth meet­ing on 27 July 2010. The meet­ing was chaired by Steven Vanackere, Bel­gian Min­is­ter of For­eign Affairs, on behalf of the High Rep­re­sen­ta­tive, in col­lab­o­ra­tion with Com­mis­sion­er Ste­fan Füle. The for­mer Yugoslav Repub­lic of Mace­do­nia del­e­ga­tion was head­ed by Anto­nio Milosos­ki, Min­is­ter of For­eign Affairs of the for­mer Yugoslav Repub­lic of Mace­do­nia. Deputy Prime Min­is­ter Vasko Nau­movs­ki as well as State Sec­re­tary Ilham Ismani also attend­ed the meet­ing. Also, EU Spe­cial Rep­re­sen­ta­tive and Head of the Del­e­ga­tion of the EU to the for­mer Yugoslav Repub­lic of Mace­do­nia, Erwan Fouéré, attend­ed.

The SA Coun­cil not­ed that the Euro­pean Com­mis­sion in its 2009 Enlarge­ment Pack­age rec­om­mend­ed open­ing of acces­sion nego­ti­a­tions based of the assess­ment that the coun­try had sub­stan­tial­ly addressed the key pri­or­i­ties of the Acces­sion Part­ner­ship and suf­fi­cient­ly met the polit­i­cal cri­te­ria for EU mem­ber­ship. In this regard, the SA Coun­cil not­ed the con­clu­sions of the Coun­cil of the Euro­pean Union adopt­ed on 7–8 Decem­ber 2009. The SA Coun­cil was informed that, in line with those con­clu­sions, the devel­op­ment regard­ing the coun­try was also raised at the Coun­cil of the EU held on 14 June 2010.

The SA Coun­cil not­ed the country’s pri­ma­ry objec­tive and strong com­mit­ment to open acces­sion nego­ti­a­tions as soon as pos­si­ble. It was also informed of the Government’s ded­i­ca­tion to fur­ther effec­tive imple­men­ta­tion of reforms, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the judi­cia­ry, pub­lic admin­is­tra­tion, fight against cor­rup­tion, eco­nom­ic reforms, to advance the degree of appli­ca­tion of EU acces­sion cri­te­ria and stan­dards in the coun­try.

The EU not­ed that the short-stay visa oblig­a­tions was waived in Decem­ber 2009 for bio­met­ric pass­port hold­ers. In the visa lib­er­al­i­sa­tion process the coun­try also demon­strat­ed clear capac­i­ty to imple­ment the reforms in ques­tions. The con­tin­u­ous efforts of the nation­al author­i­ties to inform the cit­i­zens about the rights and oblig­a­tions stem­ming from short term visa-free trav­el were wel­comed.

The SA Coun­cil reviewed key devel­op­ments over the pre­vi­ous year relat­ed to the ful­fil­ment of the polit­i­cal cri­te­ria. It not­ed the efforts made to imple­ment the Law on Par­lia­ment, adopt­ed last year, as regards the Parliament’s role. The EU not­ed the estab­lish­ment of a par­lia­men­tary Inquiry Com­mit­tee regard­ing the inci­dent in Par­lia­ment in 1 July. In this con­text, the SA Coun­cil not­ed that the best way to enhance the polit­i­cal cli­mate is to ful­ly imple­ment the Law on Par­lia­ment, to adopt the new Rules of Pro­ce­dure and to resume the for­mal coor­di­na­tion meet­ings between the coor­di­na­tors of polit­i­cal groups. The EU reit­er­at­ed the impor­tance of ensur­ing con­struc­tive dia­logue between polit­i­cal forces to achieve the sus­tain­able imple­men­ta­tion of key reforms and of the Ohrid Frame­work Agree­ment. The SA Coun­cil was informed that main­tain­ing momen­tum in reform efforts remains an essen­tial objec­tive for the Gov­ern­ment.

Police reform con­tin­ues to make progress and the ongo­ing imple­men­ta­tion of the new Law on inter­nal affairs is essen­tial to set the basis for a sound human resources man­age­ment sys­tem in the police. The SA Coun­cil took note of con­tin­ued efforts on judi­cial reform, includ­ing the fore­seen leg­isla­tive changes aimed at fur­ther strength­en­ing the auton­o­my, inde­pen­dence, effec­tive­ness and pro­fes­sion­al­ism of the judi­cia­ry. In this regard the EU point­ed to the utmost impor­tance of ensur­ing the inde­pen­dence and impar­tial­i­ty of judges and pros­e­cu­tors. Addi­tion­al mea­sures in the fight against cor­rup­tion were dis­cussed, which aim to fur­ther rein­force the legal frame­work, strength­en inter-agency coop­er­a­tion and build a track record of enforce­ment. In the con­duct of the fight against cor­rup­tion, polit­i­cal impar­tial­i­ty is essen­tial. The EU not­ed that legal pro­vi­sions need to be imple­ment­ed in prac­tice, eg. as regards the financ­ing of polit­i­cal par­ties and the check­ing of dec­la­ra­tions of assets and pos­si­ble con­flicts of inter­est of politi­cians and offi­cials. Con­cern­ing the pub­lic admin­is­tra­tion reform, the SA Coun­cil not­ed the impor­tance of the strength­ened leg­isla­tive frame­work and encour­aged con­tin­u­ous efforts to ensure fur­ther trans­paren­cy, pro­fes­sion­al­ism and inde­pen­dence of pub­lic admin­is­tra­tion. It wel­comed the estab­lish­ment of a spe­cial group on the pub­lic admin­is­tra­tion reform under the SAA.

The SA Coun­cil under­scored that the Ohrid Frame­work Agree­ment (OFA) remains a key part of the polit­i­cal cri­te­ria and an essen­tial ele­ment of democ­ra­cy and the rule of law as enshrined in the country’s con­sti­tu­tion­al and legal order and it must be ful­ly imple­ment­ed. The SA Coun­cil took note of the Government’s com­mit­ment to con­tin­u­ous­ly ensure effec­tive enforce­ment of OFA, notably con­cern­ing equi­table rep­re­sen­ta­tion, use of lan­guages, decen­tral­iza­tion and eth­nic com­mu­ni­ties’ inte­gra­tion through edu­ca­tion. The progress in imple­ment­ing the strat­e­gy for equi­table rep­re­sen­ta­tion of eth­nic com­mu­ni­ties in the pub­lic sec­tor was wel­comed, in par­tic­u­lar as regards the Alban­ian com­mu­ni­ty, while cer­tain oth­er eth­nic com­mu­ni­ties are still under-rep­re­sent­ed. The EU is con­cerned by state­ments by some polit­i­cal lead­ers that point in the direc­tion of aban­don­ment of OFA. Any vio­lence or threats of vio­lence are unac­cept­able and incom­pat­i­ble with the val­ues of the Euro­pean Union. The EU encour­ages all cit­i­zens, and their rep­re­sen­ta­tives, to utilise exist­ing demo­c­ra­t­ic mech­a­nisms, includ­ing the Par­lia­ment, to advance their inter­ests.

The SA Coun­cil agreed that media could have an impor­tant role in pro­mot­ing tol­er­ance and bet­ter under­stand­ing.

The EU recalled that region­al co-oper­a­tion and good neigh­bourly rela­tions form an essen­tial part of the process of mov­ing towards the EU.

The SA Coun­cil not­ed the mea­sures relat­ed to the ful­fil­ment of the eco­nom­ic cri­te­ria and the func­tion­ing of the mar­ket econ­o­my. The EU wel­comed the fact that the for­mer Yugoslav Repub­lic of Mace­do­nia has con­tin­ued to move clos­er to becom­ing a func­tion­ing mar­ket econ­o­my. Pri­vati­sa­tion is large­ly com­plet­ed, and price and trade lib­er­al­i­sa­tion have been large­ly accom­plished. The EU recog­nised the country’s appro­pri­ate macro­eco­nom­ic pol­i­cy mix in the con­text of the glob­al cri­sis, It also not­ed the impor­tance of using avail­able resources, in the present eco­nom­ic cir­cum­stances, in the most effi­cient way focus­ing pub­lic spend­ing on pur­pos­es with a high val­ue added such as invest­ment in pro­duc­tive capac­i­ty. In the area of sta­tis­tics, the Pop­u­la­tion Cen­sus sched­uled for 2011 is par­tic­u­lar­ly impor­tant.

Con­cern­ing the new Instru­ment for Pre-Acces­sion Assis­tance (IPA) the 2009–2011 Mul­ti- Annu­al Indica­tive Plan­ning Doc­u­ment (MIPD) for the for­mer Yugoslav Repub­lic of Mace­do­nia was adopt­ed on 29 June 2009. For the peri­od 2008–2010, the nation­al pro­gramme allo­cat­ed € 244.3 mil­lion to assist the coun­try on its road to Euro­pean inte­gra­tion. In addi­tion, the coun­try con­tin­ues to ben­e­fit from region­al and hor­i­zon­tal pro­grammes. Progress was achieved in the insti­tu­tion­al prepa­ra­tions for decen­tralised imple­men­ta­tion of IPA which led to the con­fer­ral of man­age­ment pow­er deci­sions for three IPA com­po­nents, while for the remain­ing two com­po­nents prepa­ra­tions are on-going.

The SA Coun­cil not­ed a high lev­el of com­pli­ance under the Sta­bil­i­sa­tion and Asso­ci­a­tion Agree­ment. It recalled the Commission’s pro­pos­al on the tran­si­tion to the sec­ond stage of the Sta­bil­i­sa­tion and Asso­ci­a­tion Agree­ment, which is now under con­sid­er­a­tion by the Council’s prepara­to­ry bod­ies.

As regards align­ment with the acquis, progress was not­ed in the legal har­mo­niza­tion and in the admin­is­tra­tive capac­i­ty build­ing in a num­ber of areas. The SA Coun­cil wel­comed the country’s pro­gres­sive par­tic­i­pa­tion in the Com­mu­ni­ty Pro­grams, not­ing that it also ini­ti­at­ed the pro­ce­dure for par­tic­i­pa­tion as observ­er in the EU Fun­da­men­tal Rights Agency. It also wel­comed the Nation­al Pro­gramme for the Adop­tion of the Acquis (NPAA) – Revi­sion 2010 and the prac­tice by the author­i­ties to annu­al­ly update the NPAA on the basis of the Commission’s Progress Report.

The EU wel­comed the country’s con­tin­ued active par­tic­i­pa­tion and the con­struc­tive approach in region­al coop­er­a­tion includ­ing in ini­tia­tives in South East­ern Europe, such as the South East Euro­pean Coop­er­a­tion Process, the Region­al Coop­er­a­tion Coun­cil and the con­tri­bu­tion to the EU ALTHEA mis­sion in Bosnia and Herze­gov­ina. The SA Coun­cil also took note of the com­ple­tion of the demar­ca­tion of the country’s bor­der with Koso­vo, thus mak­ing it the first coun­try of the for­mer Yugoslavia to have achieved this with all its neigh­bours.

Source:
Coun­cil of the Euro­pean Union

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →