Enemy’s Nightmare Coming True in Afghanistan, Mattis Says

WASHINGTON, March 1, 2011 — As U.S. mil­i­tary forces move toward with­draw­al from Iraq and tran­si­tion in Afghanistan, mis­sion require­ments remain numer­ous and strate­gi­cal­ly vital, the head of U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand said today.
Marine Corps Gen. James N. Mat­tis, speak­ing before the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, out­lined the sta­tus of oper­a­tions in Afghanistan, Iraq, and oth­er areas with­in his command’s area of respon­si­bil­i­ty.

“Centcom’s main effort is in Afghanistan, where along with our Afghan and coali­tion part­ners, we are mak­ing unde­ni­able progress, though some of our gains at this time remain frag­ile and … reversible,” Mat­tis said. 

In the bor­der region between Afghanistan and Pak­istan, he said, al-Qai­da is under the most pres­sure they have expe­ri­enced since 2001. “Over the past year, our ene­mies have lost lead­ers, bat­tle space, maneu­ver room and the ini­tia­tive,” he said. 

The great­est suc­cess over the past year has been the Afghan secu­ri­ty forces’ “quan­tifi­able and qual­i­fi­able growth in capa­bil­i­ty,” Mat­tis said, adding that he sup­ports plans to increase Afghan forces by between 45,000 and 70,000 new members. 

“With [their] improv­ing qual­i­ty and com­bat per­for­mance … we are see­ing the enemy’s worst night­mare com­ing of age,” the Cent­com com­man­der said. 

“The enemy’s strat­e­gy has been under­cut by the clear com­mit­ment of the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty and the Afghan gov­ern­ment to begin, this sum­mer, a process of ful­ly tran­si­tion­ing respon­si­bil­i­ty to Afghan lead by 2014,” Mat­tis said, adding that the pace of with­draw­al will be based on ground conditions. 

The over­all cam­paign is on track in Afghanistan, he said, but there will be tough fight­ing ahead as the ene­my tries to regain the initiative. 

“We must also redou­ble our efforts to address chal­lenges in the areas of gov­er­nance and devel­op­ment in Afghanistan,” he said. 

Turn­ing to Pak­istan, Mat­tis said, “We are strength­en­ing and deep­en­ing our secu­ri­ty part­ner­ship with Islam­abad, even as we work to over­come years of mis­trust and mis­un­der­stand­ing on both sides.” 

Pak­istan has shift­ed a quar­ter of its army – 140,000 troops — to its west­ern bor­der, and coali­tion forces are con­duct­ing “ham­mer-and-anvil” oper­a­tions in close coop­er­a­tion with Pak­istani forces on either side of that bor­der, Mat­tis said. 

Pak­istan has con­duct­ed sig­nif­i­cant coun­terin­sur­gency oper­a­tions over the past decade, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the past two years, he said, and has suf­fered 2,757 troops killed and 8,549 wounded. 

While the sit­u­a­tion in Afghanistan remains his top focus, Mat­tis said, Iraq is gain­ing sta­bil­i­ty and the planned U.S. tran­si­tion from a mil­i­tary- to a civil­ian-led effort is underway. 

“As we tran­si­tion to civil­ian lead in Iraq, it is essen­tial that the State Depart­ment be suf­fi­cient­ly resourced to solid­i­fy rela­tion­ships between the Unit­ed States and Iraq for the future,” he said. 

As well, Mat­tis said, Cent­com needs con­gres­sion­al author­i­ties to con­tin­ue advis­ing, train­ing and equip­ping Iraqi forces under the lead of State’s Office of Secu­ri­ty Coop­er­a­tion Iraq. 

“Look­ing ahead, we will rede­ploy our mil­i­tary forces from Iraq this year, unless asked to stay by the Iraqi gov­ern­ment and the U.S. gov­ern­ment con­curs,” he said. 

Mat­tis said he antic­i­pates al-Qai­da in Iraq and Iran­ian-spon­sored prox­ies will try to dis­rupt progress in Iraq by launch­ing attacks in the com­ing months. 

The Cent­com com­man­der said threats in his area of respon­si­bil­i­ty range from Iran and al-Qai­da to the ongo­ing Israeli-Pales­tin­ian conflict. 

Iran, Mat­tis said, cur­rent­ly rep­re­sents the great­est threat to long-term region­al security. 

“We are coun­ter­ing the malign activ­i­ties of the regime, while bol­ster­ing rela­tion­ships with our part­ners,” he said, adding that Iran per­sis­tent­ly rebuffs inter­na­tion­al efforts toward engagement. 

“[Iran] con­tin­ues to coerce its own pop­u­la­tion and pur­sue activ­i­ties dis­rup­tive to region­al peace and sta­bil­i­ty,” Mat­tis said, “includ­ing sup­ply­ing arms to mil­i­tant prox­ies in Iraq and Afghanistan, and sup­port­ing Hezbol­lah in Lebanon.” 

The Cent­com com­man­der said he has “no rea­son for opti­mism” about Iran’s pur­suit of nuclear weapons capa­bil­i­ty, grow­ing bal­lis­tic mis­sile arse­nal, and desta­bi­liz­ing region­al influence. 

Mat­tis said Cent­com is dis­rupt­ing al-Qai­da and oth­er vio­lent extrem­ist orga­ni­za­tions, and is active­ly focused on the extrem­ist threat in Yemen. 

“With our inter­na­tion­al part­ners, our spe­cial oper­a­tions forces are putting our most vio­lent ene­mies and relat­ed net­works under increas­ing­ly intense pres­sure,” he said. “At the same time, the pop­ulist-inspired changes that are tak­ing place across the region under­cut the mes­sage of al-Qai­da and oth­er extrem­ist groups.” 

Pop­u­lar protests in coun­tries across the region, Mat­tis said, “have achieved more change in 10 weeks than 10 years of al-Qaida’s mur­der­ous campaign.” 

Con­di­tions in the Mid­dle East rep­re­sent a defin­ing moment for peo­ple in the region and by exten­sion, he said, “a crit­i­cal moment for Cen­tral Com­mand to remain engaged with our part­ners and to clear away obsta­cles to peace and prosperity.” 

Mat­tis said while Israel and Pales­tine aren’t in Centcom’s area of respon­si­bil­i­ty, lack of progress toward a com­pre­hen­sive Mid­dle East peace affects U.S. secu­ri­ty inter­ests in the region. 

“I believe the only reli­able path to last­ing peace in this region is a viable two-state solu­tion between Israel and Pales­tine,” he said. “This issue is one of many that is exploit­ed by our adver­saries in the region, and is used as a recruit­ing tool for extrem­ist groups.” 

By con­trast, Mat­tis said, sub­stan­tive progress in the peace process would improve Centcom’s oppor­tu­ni­ties to work with region­al part­ners and sup­port mul­ti­lat­er­al secu­ri­ty efforts. Mil­i­tary lead­ers rec­og­nize Con­gress faces tough deci­sions in the cur­rent con­strained fis­cal envi­ron­ment, Mat­tis said. 

“In all of our activ­i­ties at Cen­tral Com­mand, we hon­or the oblig­a­tion to be the best stew­ards pos­si­ble of our nation’s mon­e­tary resources,” he said. “Cent­com has estab­lished strin­gent con­trol mech­a­nisms to exe­cute our fis­cal author­i­ties and to apply increas­ing­ly effec­tive over­sight of all programs.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →