DOD Continues to Study Dust, Burn Pit Health Effects

WASHINGTON, July 20, 2011 — The Defense Depart­ment con­tin­ues to be con­cerned that air­borne dust and smoke may pose health risks to deployed ser­vice mem­bers, the department’s chief of health assur­ance said here yes­ter­day.

How­ev­er, R. Craig Postle­waite told the Pen­ta­gon Chan­nel, there is no evi­dence to sug­gest that ser­vice mem­bers deployed to U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand are being dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly affect­ed by envi­ron­men­tal fac­tors.

DOD believes it is plau­si­ble that some indi­vid­u­als could be adverse­ly affect­ed by either the smoke or the sand and dust [in the region],” Postle­waite said.

Of the mil­lions of ser­vice mem­bers who have deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, only about 100 have been affect­ed by these con­di­tions, Postle­waite said. The depart­ment vows to give the best care to any ser­vice mem­bers ill for any cause, he added, includ­ing envi­ron­men­tal expo­sures.

Health spe­cial­ists will exam­ine the ser­vice mem­bers to find out why they are affect­ed and oth­ers are not, Postle­waite said.

What’s dif­fer­ent about these peo­ple?” he asked. “[Did they have] more expo­sure? Pre-exist­ing con­di­tions? Genet­ic sus­cep­ti­bil­i­ties?”

Offi­cials also will ask if their con­di­tions could be the result of com­bined expo­sures – dust, smoke and tobac­co, for exam­ple.

Postlewaite’s orga­ni­za­tion over­sees test­ing to ensure ser­vice mem­bers’ health. Deploy­ment oper­a­tional health sur­veil­lance char­ac­ter­izes haz­ards present in the air, water or soil in deployed set­tings.

We have col­lect­ed almost 20,000 air, water and soil sam­ples through­out [the Cen­tral Com­mand area],” Postle­waite said. “They’ve been ana­lyzed for any haz­ardous mate­ri­als. We take that we cat­a­logue it and archive it, and it’s avail­able for us to go back to if we need to. That said, the num­ber of haz­ards we’ve iden­ti­fied in these 20,000 sam­ples is rel­a­tive­ly small.”

The group ana­lyzes water for organ­ic chem­i­cals, met­als and any­thing else that may present health haz­ards, he said. “We do the same thing with the soil – par­tic­u­lar­ly look­ing for any spills that may have occurred, any con­t­a­m­i­na­tion from pre­vi­ous oper­a­tions,” said he added. “For the air, we ana­lyze it for a vari­ety of dif­fer­ent things.”

The Army stud­ied air sam­ples from around Iraq and Afghanistan. Its Advanced Par­tic­u­late Mat­ter Study was pub­lished in 2010.

There were lit­er­al­ly thou­sands of air sam­ples col­lect­ed for just that study from 15 dif­fer­ent loca­tions through­out the the­ater,” Postle­waite said. “They were ana­lyzed for dozens of dif­fer­ent poten­tial air haz­ards. When all the analy­sis was done, there were more than 6 mil­lion data points that came out of the study.”

The study indi­cat­ed that the sand and dust present in the the­ater was “not demon­stra­bly dif­fer­ent” form the sand and dust in desert regions of the Unit­ed States, he said. “The pro­por­tions of var­i­ous types of cal­ci­um and var­i­ous com­pounds were a bit dif­fer­ent, but there was noth­ing that stood out as a health haz­ard that affects our peo­ple,” Postle­waite said.

The air in cities was affect­ed by smog, and the sam­ples tak­en at bases were able to mea­sure pol­lu­tion from burn pits, Postle­waite said. “For those instal­la­tions that still hap­pened to have burn pits at the time, those air sam­ples tend­ed to indi­cate the organ­ic mate­r­i­al that was burned from the fires,” he said.

The burn pits were a neces­si­ty when forces first moved into Iraq and Afghanistan, he said, because accu­mu­lat­ed garbage caus­es pub­lic health prob­lems. Nei­ther Iraq nor Afghanistan had an infra­struc­ture — no garbage trucks, no land­fills. So com­man­ders had to burn the waste, Postle­waite said.

At the small­est camps, it could have been a sin­gle trench in the ground or a bar­rel that burned once dai­ly,” he said. As the size of an instal­la­tion increased, the size of the burn pit increased also. At the largest instal­la­tions, acres were set aside for waste dis­pos­al.

What went into the pits were the same things that go into dumps any­where in the Unit­ed States – garbage and refuse from offices and liv­ing quar­ters.

Ear­ly on in the oper­a­tion, there was also a lot of con­struc­tion going on, so there may have been a fair amount of wood [and] some plas­tic mate­ri­als. We’ve had reports of cer­tain things that we would­n’t con­done burn­ing today that prob­a­bly were burned,” Postle­waite said. “Since that time, very strin­gent reg­u­la­tions have been put into place that now severe­ly lim­it what can be burned in the burn pits and what can’t.”

All those things that could poten­tial­ly gen­er­ate a haz­ardous emis­sion of some sort are now elim­i­nat­ed from the waste stream, he said.

We’re rea­son­ably cer­tain that for those burn pits that con­tin­ue to exist based on the mate­ri­als being burned now, we don’t have near­ly the con­cerns with the health impacts that we had to begin with,” Postle­waite said.

In Iraq, the burn pits were replaced by incin­er­a­tors. Also, Iraq is devel­op­ing the infra­struc­ture to han­dle waste. A plan is in place to close all of the burn pits in Afghanistan by the end of the year, Postle­waite said.

Com­plaints about res­pi­ra­to­ry prob­lems from burn pit smoke began about four years ago, he said. The depart­ment treat­ed these alle­ga­tions seri­ous­ly and began inves­ti­gat­ing as soon as pos­si­ble, he said.

The reports com­ing out of the vet pop­u­la­tion cov­ered a wide water­front – skin, res­pi­ra­to­ry, can­cer autoim­mune con­di­tions,” he said. “You would expect with a com­mon expo­sure to see a com­mon type of ill­ness, and we weren’t see­ing that.”

The depart­ment did a com­plete risk assess­ment fol­low­ing Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency pro­to­cols at the burn pit at Bal­ad Air Base, Iraq. “We looked at that in detail and we could come up with no mea­sure­able, antic­i­pat­ed risk based on the expo­sure to the air sam­pling that we accom­plished for the burn pit smoke sam­ples,” Postle­waite said.

Again, he added, there was noth­ing out of the ordi­nary.

Still, DOD will con­tin­ue to col­lect med­ical sur­veil­lance data and will con­tin­ue lab and clin­i­cal research on inhal­ing smoke and dust, Postle­waite said. The depart­ment will also con­tin­ue to reach out to med­ical experts in and out of gov­ern­ment for advice, he added.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →