Australia — Stephen Smith press conference at ISAF HQ, Afghanistan

STEPHEN SMITH: My vis­it to Afghanistan is in a sense in three parts, first­ly my meet­ings today with Afghan Min­is­ters, my brief­in­gs this evening, in par­tic­u­lar tonight, din­ner with Gen­er­al Patraeus on ISAF mat­ters and then third­ly tomor­row, a vis­it to Tarin Kowt and Uruz­gan Province to see on the ground what we’re actu­al­ly doing.

First­ly, I’ve had today two meet­ings with Afghan min­is­te­r­i­al coun­ter­parts, Inte­ri­or Min­is­ter Moham­ma­di and Defence Min­is­ter War­dak. A num­ber of points, first­ly both Min­is­ters under­lined very much the great grat­i­tude of the Afghan Gov­ern­ment and Afghan peo­ple for the con­tri­bu­tion that Aus­tralia is mak­ing to secu­ri­ty in Afghanistan and they par­tic­u­lar­ly make the point of acknowl­edg­ing the sac­ri­fice and the pain that Aus­tralian sol­diers, Aus­tralian fam­i­lies, and Aus­tralia has suf­fered in recent times with 10 deaths in a few short months. Sec­ond­ly, the con­tri­bu­tion that Aus­tralia makes is very much appre­ci­at­ed; not just the qual­i­ty of the work but the man­ner in which Aus­tralian sol­diers go about it.

I think it’s true to say that in the meet­ings I had with the two Min­is­ters, there is a very strong com­mit­ment, a very strong resolve, to the pro­gram of tran­si­tion, of tran­si­tion­ing secu­ri­ty arrange­ments from the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force to the Afghan Nation­al Army and the Afghan Police Force. A very strong com­mit­ment and resolve to see that train­ing effect­ed. That of course is in Uruz­gan Province, Australia’s mis­sion to train Kan­daks to enable the Afghan secu­ri­ty ser­vices to be in a posi­tion to take care of secu­ri­ty mat­ters them­selves.

I of course arrive in the after­math of the Afghan par­lia­men­tary elec­tions, and whilst there will be a range of issues that the Afghan Elec­tion Com­mis­sion and Com­plaints Com­mis­sion need to deal with, my analy­sis from afar has been rein­forced by the analy­sis of the Afghan Min­is­ters which is very pleased that for the first occa­sion that we see secu­ri­ty for the Afghan elec­tion planned and imple­ment­ed by Afghan secu­ri­ty ser­vices, in par­tic­u­lar the Afghan Nation­al Army and police.

So I am, of course, very grate­ful for the mes­sage of sol­i­dar­i­ty and con­do­lences that I received from the two Min­is­ters. They are also very pleased to hear that strong com­mit­ment and resolve to the tran­si­tion. The meet­ing, the so-called Kab­ul Con­fer­ence, was held here a cou­ple of months ago where the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty resolved to effect that tran­si­tion by 2014. My judg­ment after the brief­in­gs I have received and meet­ings I have held to date is that slow progress is being made. No-one is over­stat­ing the dif­fi­cul­ty of the task, but I think it is the case on the train­ing front and the secu­ri­ty front, par­tic­u­lar­ly in Kab­ul itself, progress is being made.

QUESTION: Giv­en the focus is so square­ly now focused on the tran­si­tion and on the train­ing front in par­tic­u­lar, have you received any requests dur­ing your talks so far today for Aus­tralia to do more?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well oth­er than on the ques­tion of train­ing of police, whether it is pos­si­ble for us to add to the con­tri­bu­tion we are mak­ing on the police front, no. Of course our increase in con­tri­bu­tion has come in two ways. First­ly, the [inaudi­ble] surge where we have seen a sig­nif­i­cant increase in Unit­ed States and NATO forces, we increased our con­tri­bu­tion from 1100 to 1550 some 18 months ago. That’s effec­tive­ly as 40 per cent increase. More recent­ly we have, of course, sub­stan­tial­ly increased our civil­ian con­tri­bu­tion, devel­op­ment assis­tance and also police train­ing so, for exam­ple, the num­ber of Aus­tralian Fed­er­al Police offi­cers engaged in train­ing has been increased in recent times from 20 to about 28.

Now I have been asked to look at if there is more we can do on that front. Obvi­ous­ly that is a con­ver­sa­tion that I need to have with the For­eign Min­is­ter, Mr Rudd, and also the Gov­ern­ment in gen­er­al, but from my own point of view, giv­en we need to ensure train­ing not just of the Afghan Nation­al Army but also the police that is some­thing that I am very hap­py to take back to the Gov­ern­ment to see if there is more we can do on that front.

QUESTION: So you have not had a request for addi­tion­al mil­i­tary per­son­nel, artillery, engi­neers? .

STEPHEN SMITH: No and I wouldn’t expect that. As I say, I’ve had some brief­in­gs today with Aus­tralian offi­cials includ­ing those involved with the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force. I’m about to go and have a meet­ing and din­ner now with Gen­er­al Petraeus but giv­en we made that sub­stan­tial increase in our con­tri­bu­tion some time ago to 1550, we have nei­ther been expect­ing nor received any request for an increase to the 1550 and the point that I’ve made and my pre­de­ces­sors have made is that our con­tri­bu­tion is about right. We are the largest non-NATO con­trib­u­tor and come in the top dozen con­trib­u­tors and we are mak­ing a sub­stan­tial con­tri­bu­tion to the train­ing of Afghan secu­ri­ty ser­vices in Uruz­gan Province.

QUESTION: Mr Smith, in dis­cus­sions we have had here in the back­ground, we’ve been told it is like­ly that you will get a request specif­i­cal­ly for artillery instruc­tors for the Afghan Army, and a total num­ber of around 30 police and army per­son­nel may be sought.

STEPHEN SMITH: Well in these mat­ters I don’t deal in hypo­thet­i­cals as I say, the only con­ver­sa­tion I have had today which goes to those mat­ters, to fur­ther assis­tance in the police train­ing area. If I do receive a request from the Afghan author­i­ties, then obvi­ous­ly I will con­sid­er that and car­ry it back. I take these things very much step by step, stage by stage. For some time now as a gen­er­al propo­si­tion the Aus­tralian view is that we are mak­ing a sig­nif­i­cant con­tri­bu­tion and that that con­tri­bu­tion is about right.

QUESTION: Has it been put to you, or is it your view that with­out extra train­ing sup­port, things could be on a knife edge here in terms of the progress con­tin­u­ing or stalling or going back­wards?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well I’m very much look­ing for­ward to my con­ver­sa­tion with Gen­er­al Petraeus, but as I say, the basis of con­ver­sa­tions I’ve had, there is a view that slow but steady progress is being made. We have seen, for exam­ple over the last 12 months or so, a sub­stan­tial increase in the num­ber of Unit­ed States forces on the ground and NATO forces, but the one thing that has if you like impressed me in con­ver­sa­tions with Afghan Min­is­ters has been a steely resolve to effect the tran­si­tion of secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty and a very clear under­stand­ing that train­ing is the key.

Just going back to the ques­tion of pro­vid­ing addi­tion­al con­tri­bu­tions. With­in our 1550 cap of course on a reg­u­lar basis we review what those forces are doing, so it is pos­si­ble, for exam­ple, from time to time to swap the func­tion or swap the role. If, for exam­ple, if I receive a request on the artillery front, that is some­thing that could be in that con­text, but in say­ing that I have not received such a request yet.

QUESTION: Does it sur­prise you that clear­ly NATO offi­cials are push­ing for more train­ers from a whole bunch of coun­tries to sup­port the effort, but at the same time Barack Obama’s strat­e­gy is to start with­draw­ing mid next year?

STEPHEN SMITH: There are two points to make here. First­ly we know that Pres­i­dent Oba­ma has asked Gen­er­al Petraeus to effect a review by Decem­ber this year to see how the surge is going, how the effects of the secu­ri­ty tran­si­tion are going. I have always tried to advise peo­ple to be wary of con­fus­ing a draw­down with a with­draw­al and the Pres­i­dent, Gen­er­al Petraeus, and his pre­de­ces­sor always made it clear that any such draw down has to be con­di­tions based, so again my approach is, let’s await the out­come of the review that Gen­er­al Petraeus will effect on the President’s behalf by Decem­ber this year and then see, what if any, draw­down occurs in July of next year. Pres­i­dent Oba­ma him­self has made that point that these mat­ters do need to be con­di­tions based, and cer­tain­ly Gen­er­al Petraeus has made that point as well.

QUESTION: Hav­ing now been here and had some brief­in­gs, are you still com­fort­able with the time­frame of two to four years where­by Aus­tralia can start wind­ing back?

STEPHEN SMITH: That con­tin­ues to be the advice from the Chief of the Defence Force and I have to say that in the course of my dis­cus­sions today and I don’t over­state, I have had sug­ges­tions from Afghan offi­cials that pos­si­bly the train­ing could be done more quick­ly. Now I don’t over­state that, I think the advice we have received from the Chief of the Defence Force, which has been con­sis­tent advice now for a peri­od of time, is that we believe on the basis of that advice that our train­ing job can be done in two to four years.

QUESTION: Are the Afghan offi­cials and Afghan Defence Min­is­ter sug­gest­ing that in Uruz­gan those troops might be ready, or near­ly ready to take con­trol?

STEPHEN SMITH: Once again, I don’t want to over­state that. There was a bit of opti­mism expressed that it could be done in a short­er peri­od of time but still with­in the two to four year peri­od.

QUESTION: So clos­er to two years than four?

STEPHEN SMITH: You might want to split the dif­fer­ence.

QUESTION: Were any oth­er con­cerns raised by the Afghan Inte­ri­or Min­is­ter or Defence Min­is­ter about the way Aus­tralian sol­diers are per­form­ing; about civil­ian casu­al­ties?

STEPHEN SMITH: On the con­trary, both Min­is­ters have made the point that they high­ly val­ue the way in which Aus­tralian troops con­duct them­selves and they believe the Aus­tralian peo­ple mixed well with the Afghan com­mu­ni­ty; go out of their way to ensure good rela­tions there. We know that from time to time, some­times regret­table and ter­ri­ble inci­dents occur which involve civil­ians, but the Army, the Chief of Defence Force and the Gov­ern­ment have always been strong­ly of the view that when these inci­dents occur they are rig­or­ous­ly and exten­sive­ly and exhaus­tive­ly exam­ined, and if mis­takes have been made then we are upfront, open and trans­par­ent about it.

On the con­trary, the regard with which our forces are held is not just one of exper­tise and qual­i­ty, but of the way they car­ry them­selves, the way they con­duct them­selves, and go out of their way to ensure they get on with the local peo­ple and that is con­sis­tent with the gen­er­al approach. This is not a con­flict which can be one by mil­i­tary force alone and that is why in addi­tion to a mil­i­tary and secu­ri­ty effort there also has to be a polit­i­cal and civil­ian and a devel­op­ment assis­tance con­tri­bu­tion, and in the course of my dis­cus­sions with the two Afghan Min­is­ters and more gen­er­al­ly we have also dis­cussed the peace and rec­on­cil­i­a­tion plan and the need for rec­on­cil­i­a­tion, the need for rein­te­gra­tion but ulti­mate­ly for a polit­i­cal solu­tion that is respect­ed not just in Afghanistan but in the region.

QUESTION: While you have been here, have you had any brief­ing on that bat­tle in Deh Rawood, the email?

STEPHEN SMITH: No, but I am expect­ing that tomor­row when I am in Tarin Kowt and Uruz­gan Province and I will have the oppor­tu­ni­ty to speak to some of the Com­man­dos involved. I cer­tain­ly won’t walk away if that occurs, but I make this very impor­tant point, irre­spec­tive of what I hear tomor­row, I will wait patient­ly for the out­comes of the exhaus­tive and com­plete inves­ti­ga­tion by the Aus­tralian Defence Force into that inci­dent and that death. I don’t think it is appro­pri­ate for me to be sec­ond guess­ing or mak­ing a judg­ment in advance. I think every­one should wait for that exhaus­tive report that takes place in the course of nor­mal events. I have made clear and Gen­er­al Evans has made clear and CDF has made clear to me that all the asser­tions out there in the pub­lic are­na will be tak­en into account dur­ing the course of the inves­ti­ga­tion includ­ing the views of the email.

QUESTION: So if that inves­ti­ga­tion found that Aus­tralians do need more fire sup­port in Uruz­gan would that be some­thing that you would con­sid­er?

STEPHEN SMITH: As I don’t sec­ond guess in advance let’s await the inves­ti­ga­tion and the report.

Press release
Min­is­te­r­i­al Sup­port and Pub­lic Affairs,
Depart­ment of Defence,
Can­ber­ra, Aus­tralia

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →