Australia — Minister for Defence, Stephen Smith on ADFA Skype Incident

BEVERLEY O’CONNOR: Well the Defence Min­is­ter, Stephen Smith, has lashed out at Defence depart­ment offi­cials over the han­dling of a case involv­ing a female cadet who was filmed hav­ing sex.
MICHAEL ROWLAND: Eva Cox is the chair of the Women’s Elec­toral Lob­by and she says the way the case was han­dled is a sign the prob­lems with­in the Defence Force are sys­temic.

[Excerpt from inter­view]

EVA COX: They always seem to be push­ing against acknowl­edg­ing that they’ve got a prob­lem. It comes up again and again and again. They con­stant­ly claim it’s a one-off, it’s dif­fer­ent.

And they’ve han­dled this one extra­or­di­nar­i­ly bad­ly, which says this is sys­temic. This is not a one-off. This is a prob­lem with the whole way that Defence sees the issues as some­thing which is an indi­vid­ual prob­lem but not an organ­i­sa­tion­al one.

[End excerpt]

BEVERLEY O’CONNOR: Eva Cox from the Women’s Elec­toral Lob­by.

For more, Defence Min­is­ter Stephen Smith is with us in the stu­dio now.

Many thanks for join­ing us.

STEPHEN SMITH: It’s a plea­sure.

BEVERLEY O’CONNOR: You prob­a­bly would­n’t be tak­ing issue with what Eva Cox is say­ing there about this prob­lem.

STEPHEN SMITH: Well I think there are two things that need to be han­dled very care­ful­ly. First­ly, we just need to work our way through the indi­vid­ual cir­cum­stances of the actu­al case and the way in which that’s been han­dled by the Defence Force, bear­ing in mind that whilst oth­er peo­ple might be able to come to a con­clud­ed view about guilt or inno­cence, that’s not some­thing that I have the lux­u­ry of. So I have to be care­ful about what I say in respect of the case itself.

Sec­ond­ly, I do have to think through very care­ful­ly whether what we’ve seen does reflect some broad­er sys­temic issue. Now, that’s obvi­ous­ly some­thing that I want to do in a sense at leisure. It’s not some­thing that I’m going to respond to quick­ly.

So we’ve got to deal with the cir­cum­stances of the han­dling of this case and then look at the ques­tion of whether more needs to be done by way of more gen­er­al issues or sys­temic issues.

MICHAEL ROWLAND: You were going to get some answers last night from the Defence Force Acad­e­my on a cou­ple of crit­i­cal issues. The first one is who made this woman, who made the deci­sion to make the woman involved pub­licly apol­o­gise to her fel­low cadets for going pub­lic? And who decid­ed to go ahead with this dis­ci­pli­nary hear­ing or ini­tial­ly go ahead with this unre­lat­ed dis­ci­pli­nary hear­ing? Have you got answers to those?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, I think three things. First­ly, I’ve received some advice late last night from the chief of the Defence Force through the vice chief of the Defence Force who, in a port­fo­lio sense, has man­age­ment respon­si­bil­i­ty for the Acad­e­my and for issues relat­ing to train­ing and the like.

As in invari­ably the case, when you receive advice, whilst it resolves some issues, it rais­es ques­tions about oth­ers. And giv­en the hour of the day, I haven’t yet had the chance to speak to the chief of the Defence Force about it, but I’ll do that in the course of the morn­ing.

I think a cou­ple of things. First­ly, there’s very strong advice that the young woman was pro­vid­ed with appro­pri­ate coun­selling, sup­port, psy­cho­log­i­cal coun­selling and the like, peer sup­port from the first moment.

Sec­ond­ly, there’s very strong advice that the Com­modore of the Acad­e­my did not put the young woman in the posi­tion that has been assert­ed, name­ly requir­ing her to apol­o­gise. So there’s very strong advice on that.

BEVERLEY O’CONNOR: So let’s just clar­i­fy that she was­n’t asked-

STEPHEN SMITH: Yes.

BEVERLEY O’CONNOR: ‑to apol­o­gise.

STEPHEN SMITH: There’s very strong advice to me that the asser­tion that has been made pub­licly was­n’t the case.

BEVERLEY O’CONNOR: Okay.

STEPHEN SMITH: All of that, how­ev­er, is coloured by the point I made yes­ter­day. At the same time the events are unfold­ing with respect to the Skype mat­ter, the young woman con­cerned has been processed for oth­er mat­ters unre­lat­ed which occurred back in March, for dis­ci­pli­nary mat­ters. The oral advice I had yes­ter­day was that those mat­ters were dealt with in part but not in whole.

The for­mal advice I have overnight is that the mat­ter was dealt with to its final­i­ty yes­ter­day, includ­ing con­vic­tion and pun­ish­ment of minor offences, which involved alco­hol and absent with­out leave. And the pun­ish­ment imposed for those mat­ters was five days’ restric­tion, which is essen­tial­ly five days’ restric­tion to base and one day’s pay being docked. Now that I’ve got access to the full facts and cir­cum­stances, it’s quite clear that at pre­cise­ly the same moment that the young woman was advised of the Skype inci­dent, she was charged with these mat­ters.

Now I regard that, as I said yes­ter­day, as being some­where from com­plete­ly insen­si­tive to com­plete­ly stu­pid. The prob­lem for the offi­cials deal­ing with the mat­ter is that now colours the entire view of this cir­cum­stance.

So I make the same point today that I did yes­ter­day that the deal­ing of anoth­er dis­ci­pli­nary mat­ter at the same time as the inves­ti­ga­tion was start­ing on the Skype inci­dent, if I can describe it in that way, rais­es very seri­ous issues of judg­ment and runs the risk of colour­ing the entire per­cep­tion of the way in which this has been han­dled. Now, the advice I have is that it’s acknowl­edged by the Com­man­dant of the Acad­e­my and by the Vice Chief and the Chief of the Defence Force that doing this was a very seri­ous error of judg­ment. And there’s no doubt about that. The dif­fi­cul­ty now in terms of per­cep­tion, leav­ing aside facts and cir­cum­stances, it’s very easy now to make the asser­tion that this was done in response-

BEVERLEY O’CONNOR: To tar­nish her, to tar­nish her.

STEPHEN SMITH: ‑in response to the oth­er inves­ti­ga­tion. Now that is a per­cep­tion which is not just unfor­tu­nate, it’s deeply invid­i­ous. And I could not be stronger in my response that dou­ble-track­ing those two process­es was a most seri­ous error of judg­ment. And that unfor­tu­nate­ly not only now colours my view of events but colours the pub­lic view of events.

MICHAEL ROWLAND: Who’s being held account­able for that error in judge­ment?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well the Com­man­dant of the Acad­e­my, through the senior offi­cials, acknowl­edges that he was aware of these mat­ters and that it was a seri­ous error of judg­ment by him — and I agree with that — a most seri­ous error of judg­ment which now colours the entire per­cep­tion and that’s deeply regret­table.

MICHAEL ROWLAND: And based on — and that infor­ma­tion you have, do you have con­fi­dence from the head of the Defence Force Acad­e­my?

STEPHEN SMITH: As I said yes­ter­day, I need to care­ful­ly con­sid­er these issues. I want to have a dis­cus­sion with the Chief and the Vice Chief and delib­er­ate about these mat­ters before I make any pub­lic com­ment in that respect.

There are now, regret­tably, two issues. There is a very seri­ous issue which is the sub­ject of a crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­tion. There’s also now a very seri­ous issue of the way in which this mat­ter has been han­dled. And it’s a mat­ter of deep regret to me that the issue has moved to how defence has han­dled this, rather than deal­ing clear­ly and method­i­cal­ly with a very seri­ous crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­tion.

BEVERLEY O’CONNOR: Let’s go to the sys­temic issues. And we have a com­ment from one of the train­ers who trains the ADF and hun­dreds and hun­dreds of the per­son­nel there and also trains the NRL. And he says, he made the com­ment in The Age today that the issues are very sim­i­lar to the respect for women as a start­ing point.

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, I’ve made the point that the chief of the Defence Force, the Vice Chief, the Ser­vice Chiefs, could not be stronger in their own belief and com­mit­ment that the Defence Force has to bring itself cul­tur­al­ly into the mod­ern day, that there has to be respect for women in the work­place, that there has to- BEVERLEY O’CONNOR: But we hear this, Min­ster, all the time.

STEPHEN SMITH: I under­stand that.

BEVERLEY O’CONNOR: We’ve heard this.

STEPHEN SMITH: The point I’m mak­ing is — well, I’m not sure that peo­ple would say, for exam­ple, with the NRL, that there’s a per­fect out­come there, whilst peo­ple would acknowl­edge that progress has been made.

I’m not going to com­pare the NRL with the ADF. But on my judg­ment and on the judg­ment of the senior offi­cers and ser­vice chiefs, whilst progress has been made, there is a very long way to go.

I made the point yes­ter­day, when I was told about the par­al­lel track­ing of these two mat­ters, I was appalled. That view was shared by the Chief of the Defence Force. He was­n’t aware of it and nor was I. But the per­cep­tion that it rais­es is deeply invid­i­ous.

Now, we want to make sure that the atti­tudes, the approach­es and the response of indi­vid­u­als in the work­place in the Aus­tralian Defence Force — whether it’s army, navy or air force — reflects mod­ern Aus­tralian val­ues.

Those val­ues have deeply entrenched in them respect for people’s rights, respect for peo­ple, your work­mates, your pro­fes­sion­al col­leagues in the work­place and, as I said, gen­er­al­ly, not in respect to any par­tic­u­lar case.

I can’t think of a greater betray­al of trust than the cir­cum­stances sug­gest­ed by the so-called Skype mat­ter. More gen­er­al­ly, peo­ple need to under­stand that in the mod­ern day what you do online, what you do in the dig­i­tal world, inevitably becomes pub­lic. And there’s a qual­i­ta­tive dif­fer­ence between what you do in pri­vate and what you allow or run the risk of becom­ing pub­lic.

MICHAEL ROWLAND: You say all this. And it’s been said these cas­es repeat­ed­ly come up. How do you, as the min­is­ter though, try to assert your con­trol on a depart­ment that his­to­ry has shown has held enor­mous sway and cost the careers of for­mer Defence Min­is­ters?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, that goes to part of the judg­ment I now need to make is whether there’s a need to do more in terms of gen­er­al or sys­temic issues. That’s now a very seri­ous mat­ter that I need to con­tem­plate.

I also have some con­cerns, which I have pre­vi­ous­ly expressed, about the way in which Defence process­es deal with such dis­ci­pli­nary or con­duct mat­ters. And with the HMAS Suc­cess report, which I tabled in Par­lia­ment some time ago, we’ll receive from Com­mis­sion­er Gyles in the course of this year a sec­ond report which goes to how Defence han­dles and deals with these dis­ci­pli­nary mat­ters.

When you’re deal­ing with the Defence Dis­ci­pline Act, where people’s rights are in play, which may well from time to time throw up the pos­si­bil­i­ty or the real­i­ty of a crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­tion, you have to be very care­ful about the way in which you pro­ceed and don’t tram­ple over people’s rights.

But I do think that there’s some improve­ment we can make there. So in the mean­time, in terms of try­ing to ensure that the Defence Force is an attrac­tive place for young women to forge a career, that women are involved at all lev­els in the Defence Force, whilst progress has been made there is a long way to go.

BEVERLEY O’CONNOR: I put it to you, Min­is­ter, that as a woman too — and I think I can put this ques­tion — is that it’s not just about women. And of course the women, these issues around women and the treat­ment of women, it head­lines when it comes to the Defence Force.

But there seems to be a sys­temic prob­lem with regard to men and women in the way peo­ple are treat­ed in terms of those mod­ern val­ues that you talk about.

STEPHEN SMITH: Well let me respond in two ways. First­ly, every time a regret­table mat­ter like this comes to pub­lic focus, we have to be care­ful to make sure that we don’t allow that to colour our entire view.

Yes, there have been, in recent times and over the past, a num­ber of deeply regret­table inci­dences where peo­ple have not con­duct­ed them­selves per­son­al­ly in a man­ner in which they should and a man­ner which falls well below com­mu­ni­ty stan­dards and a way in which reflects very adverse­ly on the Defence Force because they’re effec­tive­ly doing it in uni­form. There’s zero tol­er­ance for that from the Ser­vice Chiefs and the Chief of the Defence Force.

But sec­ond­ly, we should not lose sight of the fact that whilst these inci­dents occurred — and we’re try­ing to make real progress on that front — every day I see exam­ples of peo­ple in the Defence Force, either civil­ian or in uni­form, who do great things.

But we do have to have peo­ple under­stand, whether they have been at the acad­e­my for eight weeks or been in the Defence Force for eight years, that respect for your work­mates in the work­place, whether they’re men or women, is an absolute essen­tial these days.

MICHAEL ROWLAND: Just very, very quick­ly, just to clear some­thing up, you said the woman was offered full coun­selling and sup­port from the very start. Was it at the start when she report­ed the case or when she went to the media?

STEPHEN SMITH: No, from the first moment. She was advised by-

MICHAEL ROWLAND: [Indis­tinct] clear that up.

STEPHEN SMITH: ‑a Defence inves­ti­ga­tor that this mat­ter had occurred. And from that first moment, my very strong advice is that that sup­port was made avail­able to her.

The point I make is regret­tably all of that is now coloured by what I describe as a par­al­lel track­ing of oth­er mat­ters which should have been held in abeyance and not dealt with until this very seri­ous mat­ter had been resolved in one way or the oth­er.

BEVERLEY O’CONNOR: Which is [indis­tinct] as you were say­ing, a lot of what hap­pens and then besmirch­es the entire force. Many thanks for join­ing us.

STEPHEN SMITH: Thank you.

BEVERLEY O’CONNOR: Stephen Smith, the Defence Min­is­ter.

Press release
Min­is­te­r­i­al Sup­port and Pub­lic Affairs,
Depart­ment of Defence,
Can­ber­ra, Aus­tralia

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →