Australia — ADF Reserves Capability: Where to Now?

Sen­a­tor David Fee­ny (Par­lia­men­tary Sec­re­tary For Defence) speech to Defence Reserves Asso­ci­a­tion Annu­al Con­fer­ence 20 Aug 2011

Dis­tin­guished guests, Ladies and Gen­tle­men.
It gives me very great plea­sure to be here today. This is my sec­ond DRA con­fer­ence as Par­lia­men­tary Sec­re­tary for Defence.
I would like to thank Rear Admi­ral Ben­nett for her pre­sen­ta­tion and con­tri­bu­tion today which pro­vides us with a greater under­stand­ing of how one of our clos­est allies and friends – Cana­da – approach­es the issue of opti­mis­ing Reserve capa­bil­i­ty.
When I first addressed this con­fer­ence I was a new­ly appoint­ed Par­lia­men­tary Sec­re­tary with a keen inter­est in and respect for the men and women of the Aus­tralian Defence Force and the busi­ness of Defence. I made it very clear I was here — because I very much want­ed to be here — to lis­ten and learn from cur­rent and for­mer mem­bers of the ADF and civil­ian per­son­nel engaged in defend­ing our coun­try and its nation­al inter­ests. My focus in the last year has been to get out and about to see first hand the chal­lenges faced by Reserves — in par­tic­u­lar Army Reserves — and also appre­ci­ate their suc­cess.
I am proud to say that it has been my absolute priv­i­lege to vis­it Head­quar­ters Sec­ond Divi­sion and each of the Brigade Head­quar­ters dur­ing the past year to meet Com­man­ders, RSMs, offi­cers and sol­diers. I have been for­tu­nate enough to attend farewell and wel­come home parades for Reserve con­tin­gents and meet sol­diers, offi­cers and their fam­i­lies. I have wit­nessed first hand Reserves on oper­a­tion ANODE in the Solomon Islands, train­ing at Canun­gra for Reserves deploy­ing to East Tim­or on OP ASTUTE, and train­ing at Irwin Bar­racks for CHOGM.
I have been impressed not only by the capa­bil­i­ty deliv­ered by Reserve units but by the obvi­ous cama­raderie and mate­ship that exists in each of the Brigades, and the exten­sion of this feel­ing of inclu­sive­ness and belong­ing to the fam­i­lies and friends of Reservists, for­mer Reservists, Employ­ers and those organ­i­sa­tions, like the DRA that sup­port Reserves.
If I could sin­gle out one word which cap­tures the qual­i­ties I have seen dis­played in the Reserve com­mu­ni­ty dur­ing the past year – I would sin­gle out TEAMWORK.

In late 2010, Min­is­ter Smith and I decid­ed that the “Rebal­anc­ing Army Review Imple­men­ta­tion Plan,” includ­ing the Army Reserve Approved Future Force would not be pro­gressed.
In the months since then Army and the Reserve com­mu­ni­ty have approached the renewed and com­plex task of devel­op­ing a mod­erni­sa­tion plan which would opti­mise the Reserves’ con­tri­bu­tion to capa­bil­i­ty with­in a Total Force con­struct with deter­mi­na­tion and col­lab­o­ra­tion. This sense of col­lab­o­ra­tion was embod­ied in the Reserve Mod­erni­sa­tion Work­shops and the open con­sul­ta­tion process which has shaped and influ­enced PLAN BEERSHEBA.  I would like to pay trib­ute to MAJGEN John Cali­gari, MAJGEN Craig Williams, MAGJEN Paul Brere­ton, Brigadier Iain Spence and his excel­lent offi­cers – Bruce and Andy, all the Brigade Com­man­ders – Peter, Stephen, Philip, Robert, Craig, RSMs, and oth­er offi­cers and per­son­nel with­in Defence and exter­nal to Defence who have come togeth­er with pro­fes­sion­al­ism as a team to make this work. It is this spir­it of team­work which will be essen­tial to the suc­cess­ful imple­men­ta­tion of Plan BEERSHEBA.
At its core Plan BEERSHEBA seeks to opti­mise the Reserve’s con­tri­bu­tion to capa­bil­i­ty with­in Army’s Total Force by incor­po­rat­ing the Reserve into Army’s force gen­er­a­tion cycle.
This is to be achieved by first, clear­ly defin­ing the tasks that the Army Reserve will under­take to deliv­er spec­i­fied capa­bil­i­ty in order to sup­port and sus­tain ADF pre­pared­ness and oper­a­tions.
The Army Reserve is required to deliv­er four core tasks.
The first task and the main effort is to deliv­er spec­i­fied warfight­ing capa­bil­i­ties with a strong empha­sis on Sta­bil­i­sa­tion Oper­a­tions. This is the type of oper­a­tion which has a strong human­i­tar­i­an ele­ment and has regret­tably become the type of oper­a­tion most com­mon in our glob­al and region­al com­mu­ni­ty. This type of oper­a­tion is an essen­tial capa­bil­i­ty the Gov­ern­ment requires of the ADF and it is the type of oper­a­tion that Reserves have proven to be high­ly adept at.
No less impor­tant is the sec­ond task required of the Army Reserve – pro­vid­ing domes­tic Human­i­tar­i­an Aid and Domes­tic Response as part of a Whole of Gov­ern­ment approach. We all know how invalu­able this role has been, espe­cial­ly to those Aus­tralians affect­ed by recent nat­ur­al dis­as­ters.
The Reserve is also tasked with pro­vid­ing and main­tain­ing indi­vid­ual capa­bil­i­ties and con­tribut­ing to Army surge capa­bil­i­ties.
Clear­ly the Reserve has been entrust­ed with sig­nif­i­cant and impor­tant roles and tasks as part of a total force.
The Reserve Mod­erni­sa­tion Work­shops deter­mined that these Reserve capa­bil­i­ties should be devel­oped and gen­er­at­ed through two pri­ma­ry mech­a­nisms:
o          First, through inte­grat­ed effects gen­er­at­ed from habit­u­al part­ner­ships that are to be devel­oped between Reg­u­lar and Reserve brigades. In essence, it is pro­posed that each of the Army’s three Reg­u­lar Mul­ti-Role Manoeu­vre Brigades should devel­op a habit­u­al rela­tion­ship with, and be sup­port­ed by, two of the Reserve’s Mul­ti-Role Brigades. These two ARes brigades will be required to gen­er­ate a bat­tle group for a 12 month peri­od each 36 months aligned to the mul­ti-role manoeu­vre brigade ‘Ready Phase’ of the Force Gen­er­a­tion Cycle.
o          Sec­ond, through increased struc­tur­al inte­gra­tion of Reserve units and sub-units with the Army’s three Reg­u­lar spe­cial­ist brigades – the 6th Brigade (which is respon­si­ble for Com­bat Sup­port and ISTAR), the 16th Avi­a­tion Brigade, and the 17th Com­bat Ser­vices Sup­port Brigade.
While the out­come has not been finalised, under Plan BEERSHEBA the Army Reserve will re-struc­ture in order to gen­er­ate these inte­grat­ed capa­bil­i­ty out­puts. For exam­ple, and again sub­ject to final­i­sa­tion, the 2nd Divi­sion may be required to gen­er­ate for a par­tic­u­lar task a col­lec­tive of sub-units that approx­i­mate an enhanced bat­tal­ion-sized bat­tle group.
In addi­tion, the 2nd Divi­sion will con­tin­ue to pro­vide Reserve Response Force com­pa­nies and retain respon­si­bil­i­ty for the vast major­i­ty of the High Readi­ness Reserve. The suc­cess of the ‘call for’ pro­vi­sions in attract­ing Army Reserve vol­un­teers, demon­strat­ed through the mul­ti­ple tours to the Solomon Islands and East Tim­or, means that we need to con­sid­er fur­ther and refine the High Readi­ness Reserve con­cept. For the time being, the focus remains on the pro­vi­sion of six Com­bat Teams from with­in the 2nd Divi­sion, sup­ple­ment­ed by spe­cial­ist posi­tions from the wider Reserve. Army is also inves­ti­gat­ing options for reward­ing Reservists who meet readi­ness require­ments as part of the 2nd Division’s Plan BEERSHEBA out­comes.
While I have men­tioned Army’s Plan BEERSHEBA, Navy and Air Force have also pro­gressed the inte­gra­tion of their Reserves into the Total force.

NAVY
The Navy Reserve has been through a peri­od of con­sol­i­da­tion fol­low­ing a Whole of Capa­bil­i­ty Work­force Review. Pri­or to the Review, the Navy Reserve enjoyed a num­ber of years when it received sup­ple­men­tary fund­ing from unspent Per­ma­nent Navy salaries. This bol­stered the Reserve’s par­tic­i­pa­tion in Navy’s day-to-day activ­i­ties con­sid­er­ably.
More recent­ly, fol­low­ing Navy’s suc­cess in recruit­ing Per­ma­nent mem­bers and in con­junc­tion with a dra­mat­ic reduc­tion in the num­ber of offi­cers and sailors sep­a­rat­ing from the Ser­vice, Navy has now reached its man­pow­er ceil­ing. This has sig­nif­i­cant­ly reduced Navy’s abil­i­ty to sup­ple­ment its Reserve. As a result, the Navy Reserve now oper­ates with­in a less-flex­i­ble bud­get. The advan­tage to Navy has been that its Reserve work-force has been pri­ori­tised, to ensure that those posi­tions that receive fund­ing are those which deliv­er the great­est lev­el of capa­bil­i­ty to the ADF.
The reduc­tion in Reserve posi­tions avail­able has, to a degree, been off­set by the sig­nif­i­cant num­ber of Navy Reservists who are employed in Non Navy Groups and are self-fund­ed by these groups.
Notably, Navy Reservists con­tin­ue to work along­side their full-time coun­ter­parts as part of a total­ly inte­grat­ed work­force. Almost 95% of Navy Reservists now have a Per­ma­nent Navy back­ground, which ensures that the Navy Reserve can make a sig­nif­i­cant con­tri­bu­tion
to Navy’s capa­bil­i­ty out­put while reduc­ing the per­ceived skills gap between Per­ma­nent and Reserve per­son­nel.
The crew­ing of the Armi­dale Class Patrol Boats is a typ­i­cal exam­ple of the effec­tive­ness of the Navy Reserve. Over the last finan­cial year, of the 6576 Per­son­nel Defi­cien­cy Days in the Armi­dale crews (that is, when Per­ma­nent per­son­nel were unavail­able), 2230 were cov­ered by Reservists – that’s 34%. Reservists cov­ered every dis­ci­pline onboard these crit­i­cal ves­sels, from Com­mand­ing Offi­cer to Bosun’s Mate.
There have been con­sid­er­able devel­op­ments in oth­er Reserve employ­ment areas, includ­ing:
o          Intel­li­gence, where Reservists have now been incor­po­rat­ed into this new Navy spe­cial­i­sa­tion;
o          A remod­elled and refo­cussed Mar­itime Trade Oper­a­tions branch, which is a Reserve-only branch that allows Reservists both to deploy to the Mid­dle East Area of Oper­a­tions and to pro­vide a watch-keep­ing capa­bil­i­ty in Bor­der Pro­tec­tion Com­mand.
Of par­tic­u­lar sig­nif­i­cance is the immi­nent intro­duc­tion into ser­vice of the new amphibi­ous ves­sels. Navy is assess­ing where its Reservists can best be utilised with­in this for­mi­da­ble capa­bil­i­ty. Ini­tial con­sid­er­a­tions sug­gest poten­tial roles ashore in the sus­tain­ment of the ships, with the prospect of sea ser­vice for some Reservists a pos­si­bil­i­ty. Indeed, the amphibi­ous arm of the Navy is an area where I see sig­nif­i­cant oppor­tu­ni­ties for future Navy Reserve ser­vice, not­ing that there is much work to be done in this area.
One oth­er future devel­op­ment under con­sid­er­a­tion is the use of Reserve Divers, which is being con­sid­ered under Project NEPTUNE.
I acknowl­edge that there is a degree of con­cern about the cur­rent oppor­tu­ni­ties avail­able to Navy Reservists. How­ev­er, as I have just out­lined I believe that there will be a num­ber of cir­cum­stances in which the Navy Reserve will prove to be an impor­tant enabler for Navy capa­bil­i­ty. In the com­ing year I very much look for­ward to work­ing with Navy on these mat­ters and trust that many of you here today will also con­tribute to this effort.

RAAF
In the Air Force, as in the Navy, Reservists are inte­grat­ed into the over­all Ser­vice struc­ture. This inte­gra­tion pro­vides Air Force with the capa­bil­i­ties required of today’s ‘One Team’ Air Force approach and the ADF’s Total Force con­cept.
An exam­ple of this suc­cess­ful inte­gra­tion was the adap­ta­tion of the Air Force Reserve ‘City Squadrons’, to include respon­si­bil­i­ty for fixed air­base func­tions. A pend­ing review into Air­base Force Pro­tec­tion will fur­ther inform the refine­ment of the Reserve role. The inte­grat­ed struc­ture has required the expan­sion of the Active Air Force Reserve estab­lish­ment to sus­tain spe­cif­ic spe­cial­ist capa­bil­i­ties, and to sup­ple­ment or com­ple­ment the Per­ma­nent force. Such inte­gra­tion involves its own chal­lenges, includ­ing ensur­ing a con­cert­ed effort at all lev­els and the avail­abil­i­ty of resources.
Air Force under­stands that an inte­grat­ed struc­ture with its geo­graph­i­cal dis­tri­b­u­tion, cou­pled with Reservist avail­abil­i­ty, presents a chal­lenge for train­ing deliv­ery. To address this chal­lenge, a pro­pos­al for an improved inte­grat­ed train­ing sys­tem is near com­ple­tion.
Air Force also recog­nis­es that cul­tur­al issues are an impor­tant aspect of suc­cess­ful inte­gra­tion of the Reserve, includ­ing the accep­tance by Per­ma­nent mem­bers of the lev­el of com­mit­ment and abil­i­ty among their Reserve coun­ter­parts.  This issue will be addressed through strong and effec­tive lead­er­ship and a clear demon­stra­tion of Reserve capa­bil­i­ty.
Notwith­stand­ing these chal­lenges, the Air Force’s inte­grat­ed struc­ture has been suc­cess­ful. The Air Force con­tin­ues to refine the roles and func­tions of its Reserve in order to ensure that its Reservists con­tin­ue to con­tribute effec­tive­ly to the oper­a­tional capa­bil­i­ty of the ADF.
The shap­ing of the Air Force Reserve has been influ­enced by the same strate­gic imper­a­tives as Navy and Army. These imper­a­tives, which have result­ed from both Gov­ern­ment pol­i­cy and oper­a­tional demands, have impact­ed across all three Ser­vices, result­ing in a change in the role for the Reserves from a tra­di­tion­al mobil­i­sa­tion base to that of an oper­a­tional reserve avail­able for day-to-day activ­i­ties.

Sup­port­ing Inte­gra­tion
You may recall that in my speech at last year’s Con­fer­ence, I referred to the Defence White Paper 2009 and the Government’s com­mit­ment to achiev­ing a bet­ter inte­gra­tion between full-time and part-time ser­vice in the ADF and, as a key ele­ment, remov­ing fac­tors that can impede the con­tri­bu­tion of Reservists to ADF capa­bil­i­ty.
I have just out­lined some spe­cif­ic mea­sures under­way in each ser­vice with regard to inte­gra­tion, how­ev­er these mea­sures are not stand alone actions. The devel­op­ment of a con­tem­po­rary employ­ment mod­el, that con­sid­ers how the Reserves as a group and Reservists as indi­vid­u­als are employed, how their work is struc­tured and the con­di­tions of ser­vice that sup­port them, is essen­tial if Defence is to con­tin­ue to enhance its over­all capa­bil­i­ty.
To assist with the shap­ing of this Total Force, I direct­ed Army to devel­op a force rota­tion mod­el that insti­tu­tion­alis­es the use of the Reserves – PLAN BEERSHEBA.
In par­al­lel to this, I also direct­ed Major Gen­er­al Brere­ton to review the ADF’s Con­di­tions of Ser­vice, in order to devel­op a mod­el that opti­mis­es the Reserve com­po­nent con­tri­bu­tion to the Total Force – PLAN SUAKIN.
Plan SUAKIN is exam­in­ing the Reserve employ­ment mod­el and asso­ci­at­ed con­structs, includ­ing Con­di­tions of Ser­vice, to bet­ter align capa­bil­i­ty require­ments with employ­ment con­di­tions. Plan SUAKIN is being devel­oped by Major Gen­er­al Brere­ton and his staff, par­tic­u­lar­ly Jerome Reid, under the aus­pices of the Strate­gic Reform Pro­gram, Reserve Reform Stream.
Plan SUAKIN is devel­oped in con­sul­ta­tion with a wide range of stake­hold­ers – both inter­nal and exter­nal to Defence – includ­ing the three Ser­vices and the DRA. I am strong­ly sup­port­ive of the approach being tak­en and the options being con­sid­ered, and com­mend to you the admirable intel­lec­tu­al rigour being applied. I would like to acknowl­edge the con­tri­bu­tion made by Major Gen­er­al Jim Bar­ry to this work. I know he has been very busy advo­cat­ing on your behalf and I know the CRESD team and the Ser­vice Direc­tors Gen­er­al Reserve have val­ued his input.
I have been par­tic­u­lar­ly impressed by the clin­i­cal accu­ra­cy of the evi­dence-based approach that has been adopt­ed in under­tak­ing this body of work. I have had pre­lim­i­nary brief­in­gs on the Civil­ian Skills Data Base, and the two Deci­sion Sup­port Tools that are under devel­op­ment to aid in com­plex deci­sion-mak­ing. I have already seen some of the ana­lyt­i­cal out­puts of the Per­son­al Cost Mod­el, and I am look­ing for­ward to a brief­ing on the Pre­dic­tive Behav­iour Mod­el deci­sion sup­port tool soon.
I am encour­aged by Major Gen­er­al Brereton’s approach, which seeks to test the evi­dence avail­able, rather than tak­ing the more famil­iar road of mak­ing deci­sions based on organ­i­sa­tion­al mem­o­ry and intu­ition alone. While organ­i­sa­tion­al mem­o­ry and intu­ition most cer­tain­ly have a place in com­plex deci­sion-mak­ing – after all, it is called ‘the art of war’ – recourse to empir­i­cal­ly valid evi­dence remains a pow­er­ful form of per­sua­sion.
Tak­ing a slight­ly wider per­spec­tive, the Reserve Reform agen­da seeks to deliv­er:
o          a range of employ­ment options to bet­ter match chang­ing civil­ian-mil­i­tary work-life bal­ance of the cur­rent and future Reserve force;
o          a sim­pli­fied and stream­lined full-time to part-time employ­ment spec­trum, matched to the ADF’s capa­bil­i­ty require­ments;
o          greater oppor­tu­ni­ties to use a range of mil­i­tary and non-mil­i­tary skills to enhance capa­bil­i­ty; and
o          as part of the Total Force, an opti­mised bal­ance of full-time and part-time ADF per­son­nel who pro­vide inte­grat­ed capa­bil­i­ty.
From my per­spec­tive, the two key chal­lenges fac­ing the Reserve Reform agen­da are:
o          iden­ti­fy­ing and deal­ing with the inter­nal cul­tur­al bar­ri­ers that poten­tial­ly stand in the way of deliv­er­ing inte­grat­ed capa­bil­i­ty effects; and
o          the devel­op­ment of a sin­gle point com­mu­ni­ca­tion por­tal that will allow Reservists, their employ­ers, indus­try and the com­mu­ni­ty to engage and part­ner with Defence more effi­cient­ly.
How­ev­er, I am thor­ough­ly con­vinced that future observers who review these Reserve Reform ideas and achieve­ments will con­sid­er them to be ‘good ideas, well imple­ment­ed’ by a team of pro­fes­sion­als in a col­lab­o­ra­tive man­ner.
As the two major bod­ies of work – BEERSHEBA and SUAKIN – progress, their con­flu­ence is like­ly to be sem­i­nal in shap­ing the future direc­tion of the Reserves. I am opti­mistic that, at your 2012 Con­fer­ence, I will be in a posi­tion to report pos­i­tive­ly on the impact both these Plans are hav­ing on Defence capa­bil­i­ty.

Sup­port­ing Reservists
To me, the key to the abil­i­ty of the indi­vid­ual Reservist to pro­vide capa­bil­i­ty to the ADF is the pro­vi­sion of a sup­port­ive and reli­able envi­ron­ment. This requires a sup­port­ive net­work includ­ing employ­ers, fam­i­ly, friends and the broad­er com­mu­ni­ty.
Sup­port – for both the Reservist and the employ­er – is cur­rent­ly pro­vid­ed by a num­ber of mech­a­nisms, which will be improved, broad­ened and refined.
At present, Reservists are sup­port­ed by a broad leg­isla­tive frame­work. Cen­tral to this frame­work is the work under­tak­en by the Office of Reserve Ser­vice Pro­tec­tion, with­in Cadet, Reserve and Employ­er Sup­port Divi­sion.
I have been extreme­ly impressed with the excel­lent work con­duct­ed by this Office and, in par­tic­u­lar, their abil­i­ty to resolve dis­putes, medi­ate and nego­ti­ate with a range of stake­hold­ers, find­ing pos­i­tive solu­tions often in very dif­fi­cult cir­cum­stances.
Last year I men­tioned that Defence had imple­ment­ed a series of Mem­o­ran­dums of Under­stand­ing with State and Ter­ri­to­ry police and emer­gency ser­vices. You will appre­ci­ate that the ADF shares the same skilled work­force, and it is there­fore impor­tant that both par­ties have a for­mal guid­ing frame­work in which to oper­ate, with­out detri­ment to either organ­i­sa­tion. I am advised that apart from the Aus­tralian Fed­er­al Police, only one State police ser­vice is yet to sign a Mem­o­ran­dum – but at the risk of per­son­al embar­rass­ment, I will not men­tion which south-east­ern State is tak­ing its time to sign.
It is impor­tant to note that these Mem­o­ran­dums are not oper­a­tional doc­u­ments; rather, they are intend­ed to facil­i­tate Reserve ser­vice by address­ing admin­is­tra­tive issues relat­ing to that ser­vice. To this end, the exis­tence of these doc­u­ments and the con­se­quent per­son­al rela­tion­ships that have been devel­oped between Office of Reserve Ser­vice Pro­tec­tion staff and the var­i­ous police and emer­gency ser­vices have already proven to be of great sig­nif­i­cance.
With regard to the Defence Reserve Ser­vice (Pro­tec­tion) Act 2001, we are pro­ceed­ing with amend­ments to the Act. The pro­posed amend­ments will ensure that all Reservists per­form­ing Defence ser­vice receive employ­ment and edu­ca­tion pro­tec­tion. This sup­ports the Government’s over­all pol­i­cy of ensur­ing fair­ness in the work­place.
The amend­ments will also include pro­vi­sions which will: pro­tect all Reservists from harass­ment or detri­ment in the work­place, pro­tect from vic­tim­i­sa­tion and pro­vide that a Reservist is on leave from employ­ment (rather than sus­pen­sion of employ­ment). In addi­tion, the amend­ment will intro­duce civ­il penal­ties, clar­i­fy that medi­a­tion is not manda­to­ry in all cas­es and extend pro­tec­tion to Reservists engaged in part­ner­ships and pri­vate cor­po­ra­tions.
Employ­er groups con­sult­ed dur­ing the review process, such as the Aus­tralian Indus­try Group, did not oppose extend­ing pro­tec­tions to all Reserve ser­vice. How­ev­er, in order to address oth­er issues, such as notice of deploy­ments, and to cre­ate a bal­anced and coop­er­a­tive sys­tem, I have direct­ed Defence to devel­op a suite of ini­tia­tives to ensure we have a com­pre­hen­sive employ­er sup­port scheme.
I have also asked Major Gen­er­al Brere­ton to con­sid­er what mea­sures we might imple­ment, in addi­tion to Mem­o­ran­dums of Under­stand­ing, to ensure that employ­ers are pro­vid­ed with rea­son­able notice of Reserve ser­vice — not­ing of course that Defence must main­tain the flex­i­bil­i­ty to deploy Reservists com­men­su­rate with the tasks they are required to under­take. I refer here to the need for Reservists to deploy in sup­port of dis­as­ter relief and domes­tic secu­ri­ty tasks, often at very short notice.
In the area of employ­er engage­ment, I have insti­gat­ed mea­sures to engage the prac­ti­cal exper­tise of the Defence Reserve Sup­port Coun­cil to fur­ther pro­mote the ben­e­fits of Reserve ser­vice to indus­try, employ­ers, edu­ca­tion­al insti­tu­tions and the com­mu­ni­ty. A suite of doc­u­ments have been devel­oped which set out the expect­ed per­for­mance and out­put of the Coun­cil, par­tic­u­lar­ly at the nation­al lev­el.
Work­ing with the Nation­al Chair, Mr Jack Smor­gon, we have intro­duced busi­ness rules for the oper­a­tion of the DRSC. I have also issued a for­mal direc­tive to the Chair, which spells out my intent and the out­put I expect.
These doc­u­ments will be sup­port­ed by both a Mem­o­ran­dum of Under­stand­ing and a Ser­vice Lev­el Agree­ment between Defence and the DRSC, to ensure that we work coop­er­a­tive­ly togeth­er in sup­port of our Reservists, their fam­i­lies and their employ­ers.
This year’s re-invig­o­ra­tion of the Prince of Wales Awards is reflec­tive of the renewed ener­gy being placed on sup­port­ing Reservists. These Awards are an impor­tant ele­ment of the ADF’s recog­ni­tion and reward of Reservists for their ded­i­ca­tion and com­mit­ment.
The expe­ri­ence and knowl­edge gained from a suc­cess­ful Prince of Wales Award activ­i­ty should pro­vide on-going ben­e­fits to the employ­er and Reservist, while pro­mot­ing coop­er­a­tion and sup­port between Defence and civil­ian employ­ers. This year, 17 Reservists were pre­sent­ed with an Award. Of equal impor­tance, the sup­port pro­vid­ed by the civil­ian employ­er of these Reservists was also recog­nised through the award­ing of Cer­tifi­cates of Appre­ci­a­tion.
Anoth­er re-invig­o­ra­tion has been the Tas­man Scheme, with the Scheme devel­oped into a for­mal activ­i­ty between Defence and the DRA. Under the Scheme, Junior Non-Com­mis­sioned Offi­cers of the ADF Reserves are attached for two weeks to a New Zealand Defence Force unit. The Scheme is now joint­ly man­aged and admin­is­tered by Cadet, Reserve and Employ­er Sup­port Divi­sion and the DRA. Anoth­er won­der­ful exam­ple of the broad coop­er­a­tion evi­dent in the Reserve com­mu­ni­ty.
I believe this is an excel­lent exam­ple of how Defence and a civil­ian organ­i­sa­tion sup­port­ive of Defence can work togeth­er to deliv­er an out­come of direct ben­e­fit to our Reservists, and ulti­mate­ly to capa­bil­i­ty devel­op­ment. I con­grat­u­late both Defence and the DRA on achiev­ing this out­come, which this year will see up to 14 Junior Non-Com­mis­sioned Offi­cers deploy to New Zealand.
I con­sid­er it vital­ly impor­tant that we con­sid­er and involve all the prin­ci­pal ele­ments that impact the lives of our Reservists and that have a direct bear­ing on their abil­i­ty to serve, includ­ing their fam­i­ly and their employ­er.
It is there­fore impor­tant that I cre­ate the oppor­tu­ni­ties to hear and dis­cuss issues, in order to under­stand and appre­ci­ate first-hand how we might make it eas­i­er for our Reservists, their fam­i­lies and employ­er; so that the Reserves con­tin­ue to con­tribute to the over­all capa­bil­i­ty of the ADF. Obvi­ous­ly this is part of the rea­son I am here today. I respect and val­ue the con­tri­bu­tion of all involved: the indi­vid­ual Reservist, their fam­i­ly mem­bers and employ­ers, and the broad­er com­mu­ni­ty from which our Reservists are drawn; and those indi­vid­u­als and organ­i­sa­tions that sup­port the Reserves – includ­ing the DRA.
As I con­clude, allow me to rein­force my clos­ing remarks from last year’s Con­fer­ence. From the Gov­ern­ment per­spec­tive, the Reserves are part of the ADF – they are inte­grat­ed into oper­a­tions and train­ing, admin­is­tra­tion and logis­tics. Con­tin­u­ing that inte­gra­tion is imper­a­tive. Navy, Army and Air Force are active­ly work­ing towards achiev­ing the ADF’s Total Force con­cept, while ensur­ing that Reserve ser­vice is reflec­tive of con­tem­po­rary employ­ment. We have made con­sid­er­able progress and we need to ensure that we con­tin­ue to make progress as one team focused on con­tribut­ing to capa­bil­i­ty in a col­lab­o­ra­tive man­ner.
Defence is a com­plex beast. It is also shaped by com­plex issues. Despite the chal­lenges with­in this inher­ent com­plex­i­ty, I am pleased by the proac­tive approach tak­en by all three Ser­vices – Navy, Army and Air Force – in devel­op­ing their Reserve capa­bil­i­ty as part of the ADF’s Total Force con­cept. And it is clear that the lev­el of inte­gra­tion being imple­ment­ed by the Ser­vices is cru­cial to the long-term role of the Reserves in sup­port of nation­al secu­ri­ty.
Final­ly, I would like to express my appreciation/gratitude/thanks to all of the cur­rent and for­mer Reservists and oth­er mem­bers of the Reserve com­mu­ni­ty who have wel­comed me into the Reserve com­mu­ni­ty and shared their thoughts and ideas with me. It has been a priv­i­lege to get to know you all and I believe that this col­lab­o­ra­tive spir­it has result­ed in some won­der­ful out­comes for the Reserve, and will con­tin­ue to pro­duce pos­i­tive out­comes for the men and women who serve their coun­try in the Reserve.

Thank you.

Press release
Min­is­te­r­i­al Sup­port and Pub­lic Affairs,
Depart­ment of Defence,
Can­ber­ra, Aus­tralia

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →