Allen Cites Time of Optimism in Afghanistan

KABUL, Afghanistan, Dec. 13, 2011 — As the Unit­ed States pre­pares to end its mil­i­tary mis­sion in Iraq, the com­man­der of U.S. and NATO troops here said it’s a time for opti­mism in Afghanistan, too, as progress con­tin­ues and Afghan forces assume increas­ing secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty.

Marine Corps Gen. John R. Allen, speak­ing with reporters trav­el­ing with Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta, cit­ed the “sub­stan­tial progress” made over the last 18 months, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the north­ern, south­ern and west­ern parts of Afghanistan.

Next year, Allen said he hopes to con­sol­i­date advan­tages achieved and sup­port for Afghan forces in pop­u­la­tion cen­ters in those sec­tors, while con­duct­ing “sig­nif­i­cant con­tin­ued coun­terin­sur­gency oper­a­tions” in the east.

The goal, he said, is to push out the secu­ri­ty zone from Kab­ul. “We had had some suc­cess, but would like to push that far­ther east­ward,” he said.

“As we reflect on what has just hap­pened in Iraq, we have some real­ly momen­tous months ahead of us here in Afghanistan as tran­si­tion con­tin­ues [and] as more of the Afghan pop­u­la­tion moves under the secu­ri­ty shield of the Afghan nation­al secu­ri­ty forces,” the gen­er­al said.

Allen also reflect­ed on last week’s Bonn, Ger­many, con­fer­ence and its “very clear mes­sage that the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty and many inter­na­tion­al orga­ni­za­tions there are going to be with Afghanistan for a long time.”

Also promis­ing, the gen­er­al said, was the recent nation­al assem­bly, or loya jir­ga, in which a del­e­ga­tion of more than 2,000 elders endorsed a long-term secu­ri­ty agree­ment with the Unit­ed States. The del­e­ga­tion also com­mit­ted to peace and rec­on­cil­i­a­tion.

“So I think it is a time, frankly, for opti­mism,” Allen said. “If you are a young sol­dier here, you can take heart that your dai­ly labor as an Amer­i­can sol­dier on the bat­tle­field here is pay­ing off.

“And if you lis­ten to the inter­na­tion­al voic­es being raised, it is not just going to pay off for the peri­od of time you are here,” he con­tin­ued. “It is going to pay off for a long time.”

Allen said the four pri­or­i­ties he enun­ci­at­ed when tak­ing com­mand here five months ago will con­tin­ue to guide what he pre­dict­ed will be “an inter­est­ing time for us here.”

He vowed arriv­ing at his post to keep up pres­sure on the insur­gency, to increas­ing­ly move Afghan nation­al secu­ri­ty forces into the lead, to set con­di­tions for and sup­port the tran­si­tion, and to remain flex­i­ble and agile in light of the evolv­ing oper­a­tional envi­ron­ment.

Look­ing to the future, Allen said a “strat­e­gy-based dis­cus­sion” will help guide the U.S. pos­ture in Afghanistan and draw­down plans through the end of 2014. That dis­cus­sion, he said, must rec­og­nize the evolv­ing oper­a­tional envi­ron­ment, part of it to be char­ac­ter­ized by an evolv­ing insur­gency.

Allen not­ed that the insur­gency had “a bad year” in both 2010 and 2011, and that insur­gency-ini­ti­at­ed vio­lence has been down for 25 of the last 33 weeks. In addi­tion, sig­nif­i­cant attri­tion has plagued the enemy’s lead­er­ship ranks.

Mean­while, Afghan forces con­tin­ue to grow in both num­bers and capa­bil­i­ty and are on track to reach the goal of 352,000 mem­bers next year. Most com­bat units have been field­ed, and more com­bat sup­port and com­bat ser­vice sup­port units will become oper­a­tional in 2013, he said.

This sets the stage for tran­si­tion to con­tin­ue, with the Afghans to assume the secu­ri­ty lead across the coun­try by the end of 2014, he added.

Allen said there is “zero day­light” between his and Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s strat­e­gy and draw­down plan in the Afghanistan cam­paign. Rec­og­niz­ing that the plan will involve a series of draw­downs, with the sec­ond phase to take place next year, Allen said he wants to focus on strat­e­gy as he looks ahead.

“For us, the num­ber is much less impor­tant than is the dis­cus­sion of the strat­e­gy,” he said. “It’s not about a par­tic­u­lar num­ber. It’s not about a U.S. num­ber. It’s about a much big­ger issue,” which is the com­bi­na­tion of NATO and Afghan forces.

“All those in com­bi­na­tion are part of the dis­cus­sion about the evolv­ing oper­a­tional strat­e­gy,” Allen added.

As progress con­tin­ues, he con­ced­ed that one fly in the oint­ment has been the “chilled” rela­tions with Pak­istan since the U.S. raid in May that cap­tured Osama bin Laden, and most recent­ly after a Nov. 26 bor­der inci­dent that left 24 Pak­istani sol­diers dead.

Allen said he’s com­mit­ted to a full and com­plete inves­ti­ga­tion and expects the one under way to wrap up “in the rel­a­tive­ly near future.” That, he said, will help set the stage for mov­ing for­ward.

“We want to work at get­ting the bor­der coor­di­na­tion back to a lev­el where we have a pre­dictable series of process­es that can gov­ern our actions on both sides of the bor­der,” he said.

For now, the Unit­ed States finds itself hav­ing to regain progress made in strength­en­ing rela­tion­ships with the Pak­ista­nis, par­tic­u­lar­ly regard­ing bor­der issues. “We’re work­ing it hard to restore rela­tion­ships,” he said.

Allen said he was heart­ened to learn recent­ly that many of the Pak­istani liai­son offi­cers Pak­istani Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ash­faq Parvez Kayani had recalled from head­quar­ters offices and bor­der coor­di­na­tion areas may soon return.

While trou­bling, Allen said the chal­lenges between the Unit­ed States and Pak­istan have had no real oper­a­tional effect.

The Pak­ista­nis con­tin­ue to block ground sup­ply lines into Afghanistan, but Allen said the north­ern dis­tri­b­u­tion net­work and air cor­ri­dor are keep­ing U.S. and Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Forces sup­plied.

“So at this point, we are fine and we are get­ting every­thing we need,” he said.

Mean­while, Allen said he’s sent out clear instruc­tions to his com­man­ders oper­at­ing along the Afghanistan side of the bor­der. “We should pro­ceed just as though there has been no chill in the rela­tion­ship,” he said. “The intent is to restore as much nor­mal­cy as we can to the bor­der coor­di­na­tion as ear­ly as we can.”

Estab­lish­ing that the Unit­ed States, ISAF, Pak­istan and Afghanistan can work close­ly togeth­er is crit­i­cal “because the bor­der is always going to be there,” Allen said. “So hav­ing a strong and reli­able bor­der coor­di­na­tion regime is impor­tant, and I think we remain com­mit­ted to doing that.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →