Afghanistan/Pakistan

U.S., Afghan Forces Focus on Pak­istani Bor­der

By Army Staff Sgt. Michael J. Car­den
Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice

The U.S. military’s senior offi­cer and the com­man­der of inter­na­tion­al forces in Afghanistan met with reporters here today to dis­cuss the sit­u­a­tion and threats coali­tion and Afghan forces are fac­ing.

Insur­gent activ­i­ties and coali­tion casu­al­ties have increased through­out the past months, while June was the dead­liest month for coali­tion troops in near­ly sev­en years of con­flict here. Twen­ty-eight ser­vice­mem­bers were killed.

This is due part­ly to “coali­tion and Afghan troops tak­ing the fight to the insur­gency” and the ris­ing num­ber of insur­gents cross­ing the bor­der from Pak­istan into Afghanistan, said Army Gen. David D. McK­ier­nan, com­man­der of the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force here.

The lack of abil­i­ty for the new Pak­istani gov­ern­ment to suc­cess­ful­ly mon­i­tor their bor­ders have allowed for mil­i­tant and insur­gent groups to find safe havens in the trib­al areas there, McK­ier­nan explained.

“I have con­sis­tent­ly said that we are see­ing an increas­ing lev­el of vio­lence in Afghanistan, espe­cial­ly in the east and the south,” he said. “I attribute part of that to the fact that there are sanc­tu­ary areas to mil­i­tant groups that are across the [Pak­istan] board­er in Fata and the North-West Fron­tier Province.”

Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, added, “The new Pak­istan gov­ern­ment has a very dif­fi­cult chal­lenge and con­tin­ues to work its way through, but has to enforce mak­ing sure for­eign fight­ers don’t exist out there and make sure the insur­gents don’t have the free­dom of move­ment across the bor­der.”

U.S. mil­i­tary offi­cials rec­og­nize the need for more troops in Afghanistan, but remain reluc­tant to deploy them because of com­mit­ments cur­rent­ly in Iraq. Offi­cials also real­ize the need to increase “dwell time” after deploy­ments for ser­vice­mem­bers, said Mullen, who was in Iraq the pre­vi­ous three days vis­it­ing troops and meet­ing with senior lead­ers there.

“I just came from Iraq, and the con­di­tions con­tin­ue to improve there,” he said. “I am still very hope­ful that those con­di­tions will con­tin­ue so we’ll have forces avail­able to do oth­er things. The next pri­or­i­ty would be to move forces into Afghanistan.”

In ear­ly June, Pres­i­dent Bush vowed to send addi­tion­al forces to Afghanistan in 2009. How­ev­er, there are no specifics about when that may take place, Mullen said.

“Exact­ly when the increase may occur will be based on deci­sions made about Iraq in the future,” he added. “From the nation­al per­spec­tive, we’re giv­en direc­tion from the pres­i­dent, and it’s the deci­sion of the lead­er­ship in [the U.S.] that we pri­or­i­tize accord­ing­ly.”

Mullen not­ed that the recent addi­tion of two U.S. Marine bat­tal­ions in Afghanistan — one train­ing Afghan sol­diers and police and the oth­er par­tic­i­pat­ing in heavy fight­ing in the south­ern regions — have made sig­nif­i­cant progress in the fight against ter­ror­ism.

How­ev­er, he said he remains con­cerned about the num­ber of addi­tion­al forces from the North­ern Atlantic Treaty Orga­ni­za­tion that mem­ber coun­tries have com­mit­ted to Afghanistan through­out the past year, he said.

“We need that extra capa­bil­i­ty,” he said. “[NATO] needs to do all they can do, as well.”

Mullen reit­er­at­ed his con­cerns about for­eign fight­ers cross­ing the Pak­istani bor­der and their safe havens in the country’s trib­al areas. Insur­gents flow much more freely into Afghanistan than they did a year ago, he said.

He said the Pak­istani gov­ern­ment and mil­i­tary have to put more pres­sure on their bor­der in order for Afghanistan’s gov­ern­ment to devel­op and suc­ceed.

“We all rec­og­nize that the chal­lenges here con­tin­ue to be sig­nif­i­cant,” the admi­ral said. “The vio­lence is up, but at the same time, coali­tion and Afghan forces are aggres­sive­ly engag­ing the ene­my, and we’ve had sig­nif­i­cant suc­cess­es.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →