Additional Budget Cuts Would Devastate Military, Spokesman Says

ABOARD A MILITARY AIRCRAFT EN ROUTE TO SAN FRANCISCO, Sept. 15, 2011 — Near­ly $1 tril­lion in defense cuts that the 2011 Bud­get Con­trol Act could require would dev­as­tate the mil­i­tary and the defense indus­tri­al base, and could add 1 per­cent to the nation’s unem­ploy­ment rate, the Pen­ta­gon press sec­re­tary said today.

A “seques­tra­tion” mech­a­nism in the nation’s debt-reduc­tion law auto­mat­i­cal­ly takes more cuts out of fed­er­al spend­ing if Con­gress fails to enact fur­ther mea­sures to reduce the deficit by Nov. 24. 

For the Defense Depart­ment, that means anoth­er $500 bil­lion from defense spend­ing over 10 years, on top of $350 bil­lion in cuts already iden­ti­fied over the same period. 

“If we move toward seques­tra­tion,” Press Sec­re­tary George Lit­tle told reporters, ” … we would be look­ing at, in all like­li­hood, the small­est Army and Marine Corps in decades, the small­est tac­ti­cal Air Force since [that branch of the ser­vice] was estab­lished, and the small­est Navy in near­ly 100 years.” 

Lit­tle made the com­ments en route to the Australia‑U.S. Min­is­te­r­i­al Con­sul­ta­tions that start in San Fran­cis­co tomor­row. Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta is tak­ing part in the meet­ings, along with Sec­re­tary of State Hillary Rod­ham Clinton. 

The depart­ment has been look­ing at hun­dreds of mil­lions of dol­lars in bud­get cuts and Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta has been adamant, Lit­tle said, that mov­ing to seques­tra­tion would be a “dev­as­tat­ing” sce­nario for the nation’s security. 

The sec­re­tary “has reit­er­at­ed time and time again that we don’t have to choose between our fis­cal secu­ri­ty and our nation­al secu­ri­ty,” Lit­tle said, “but if we go to seques­tra­tion, we would very well have to make that choice. 

Lit­tle said that $1 tril­lion in cuts would make it nec­es­sary for the Pen­ta­gon to break faith in some areas — includ­ing jobs and salary ben­e­fits — with those in uni­form who are serv­ing the nation. 

“In a time of war,” he said, “that’s unacceptable.” 

At the Pen­ta­gon, inter­nal analy­sis shows that seques­tra­tion also would have a pro­found impact on the U.S. indus­tri­al base, he added, by threat­en­ing many of the 3.8 mil­lion mil­i­tary and civil­ian jobs that the sec­tor represents. 

“We’re not talk­ing about just mil­i­tary jobs, we’re also talk­ing about jobs in the pri­vate sec­tor that sup­port the inno­va­tion and cre­ativ­i­ty and capa­bil­i­ties that we need to keep Amer­i­ca strong,” he said. 

Mov­ing to seques­tra­tion and the addi­tion­al bud­get cuts it would require, depart­ment offi­cials believe “would poten­tial­ly add 1 per­cent to the nation­al unem­ploy­ment rate,” Lit­tle said. 

Panet­ta, he added, has made Con­gress aware of the con­se­quences of such deep defense cuts. 

The near­ly $400 bil­lion in cuts already expect­ed from the Defense Depart­ment “is hard but man­age­able,” Lit­tle said. “Tough choic­es have to be made. A tril­lion dol­lars in defense cuts is unacceptable.” 

It’s impor­tant to have a nation­al con­ver­sa­tion about where the mil­i­tary is head­ed in the 21st cen­tu­ry, he added, and the Defense Depart­ment wants the agreed-on cuts “to be defined and framed by strat­e­gy, and not by arithmetic.” 

The sec­re­tary and oth­er offi­cials are in close con­tact with Con­gress and will con­tin­ue to dis­cuss the issue through the fall, Lit­tle said. 

“We are strong­ly encour­ag­ing every­one in this coun­try to look at what we need to keep faith with our troops, to keep the strongest mil­i­tary in the world strong, and to go about this bud­get-cut­ting process in a way that’s reasonable.” 

Every­one in Wash­ing­ton wants a strong nation­al defense, the press sec­re­tary said, adding, “We want to make it very clear that seques­tra­tion is a red line that this gov­ern­ment should not cross.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →