Active-duty Downsizing Should Benefit Reserve Forces, Board Says

WASHINGTON, March 8, 2012 — A pol­i­cy board plans to ask Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta to high­light ser­vice in the reserve forces as a good option for out­go­ing active-duty mem­bers dur­ing down­siz­ing.

In its first offi­cial action with broad­er mem­ber­ship and a direct line to the sec­re­tary, the Reserve Forces Pol­i­cy Board yes­ter­day agreed to send eight rec­om­men­da­tions to Panet­ta to encour­age Nation­al Guard and reserve ser­vice for peo­ple leav­ing active duty. The fis­cal 2013 defense bud­get request calls for the mil­i­tary to reduce its end strength by 5.5 per­cent in the next five years.

Retired Marine Corps Maj. Gen. Arnold L. Punaro, who chairs the board, said a force reduc­tion let­ter the sec­re­tary sent to the ser­vices last month includ­ed 12 objec­tives in the draw­down, but did not men­tion the Nation­al Guard and reserves.

Air Force Maj. Gen. Ani­ta Gal­len­tine, a reserve mobi­liza­tion aug­mentee who heads the board’s con­tin­u­um of ser­vice sub­com­mit­tee, said the Defense Depart­ment should learn from past draw­down mis­takes that dis­cour­aged active duty mem­bers from join­ing the reserve com­po­nents. In the post-Cold War draw­down, she said, pro­grams helped ser­vice mem­bers become civil­ian teach­ers and police offi­cers and offered bonus­es for troops to leave active duty, but they had to pay the bonus­es back if they entered the Guard and reserves.

Gal­len­tine not­ed that the reserve forces now are more of an oper­a­tional force than their tra­di­tion­al sta­tus as a strate­gic reserve, and oth­er mem­bers of the 20-mem­ber board spoke of the need to pre­serve those oper­a­tional capa­bil­i­ties and train­ing invest­ments.

Gal­len­tine said the mil­i­tary pay and per­son­nel sys­tem does not allow for an easy tran­si­tion into the reserve forces, and not­ed that many ben­e­fits are not portable. Past efforts in the Defense Depart­ment to improve con­tin­u­um of ser­vice, she added, have “buck­led under their own weight.”

“We believe that there is a lot of work that needs to be done in those over-arch­ing areas,” she said, adding that reserve cen­ters should offer more wide­spread sup­port for reservists, mod­eled after active-duty deploy­ment cen­ters.

The board also agreed to send these rec­om­men­da­tions to the sec­re­tary regard­ing home­land defense:

— Pol­i­cy changes to accel­er­ate the use of Guard and reserve forces to respond to dis­as­ters;

— Guid­ance that train­ing exer­cis­es can be used to sup­port dis­as­ter relief and oth­er mis­sions, such as when the Nation­al Guard pre-posi­tioned forces lead­ing up to Hur­ri­cane Irene in 2010;

— Guid­ance that will allow state lead­ers bet­ter pre­dictabil­i­ty for call­ing up forces under Title 32, which has been used 13 times in the past nine years;

— Increase from 75 to 90 per­cent the amount the Fed­er­al Emer­gency Man­age­ment Agency would reim­burse states for Nation­al Guard dis­as­ter relief oper­a­tions;

— Give con­sis­ten­cy to pro­tec­tions and ben­e­fits states give Nation­al Guard mem­bers.

Also, the board request­ed that Con­gress change the law on the Defense Department’s dis­as­ter reim­burse­ment fund for states to stip­u­late it is for domes­tic use only. “If we don’t lim­it it to domes­tic use, it becomes a State Depart­ment get-well fund,” he said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →