China — Dong Feng 21‑D: A Game Changer?

The era of the mighty Bat­tle­ships became his­to­ry dur­ing the Sec­ond World War with the Japan­ese attack on Pearl Har­bour. The US became the fore­most pro­tag­o­nist of the Car­ri­er Bat­tle Group (CBG) as the prime instru­ment of pow­er-pro­jec­tion. The 11 CBGs of the US Navy actu­al­ly make that coun­try a super pow­er. In 1996, the dis­patch of two US CBGs forced Chi­na to back down over Tai­wan. This humil­i­a­tion forced the Chi­nese to seek a nov­el and out of the box solu­tion to the threat of US air­craft car­ri­ers. In the Dong Feng 21 D Anti-Ship mis­sile it now seems to have found a very cost-effec­tive answer. Though as yet untest­ed in com­bat, the DF-21 Mis­siles have sig­nif­i­cant­ly enhanced the threat to the car­ri­ers. Any Amer­i­can deci­sion to parade these car­ri­ers in any future con­fronta­tion over Tai­wan would be seri­ous­ly ham­strung by the fear of los­ing these car­ri­ers to a bar­rage of Dong-Feng 21 Ds fired in mul­ti­ple salvos. The car­ri­ers could thus be sunk some 2–3,000 kms out at sea while their tac­ti­cal on-board air­craft and cruise mis­siles would be well out of range of the Chi­nese main­land. The enhanced accu­ra­cy of these inter­me­di­ate range Bal­lis­tic mis­siles has there­fore posed a seri­ous threat to the slow mov­ing Air­craft Car­ri­er armadas. How sig­nif­i­cant is this threat? Is it a game chang­er in the annals of naval war­fare that will ren­der this class of ships obso­lete? Is the long era of the Air­craft Car­ri­er final­ly over? The issue mer­its seri­ous debate and analy­sis.

This arti­cle is pub­lished with the kind per­mis­sion of “Defence and Secu­ri­ty Alert (DSA) Mag­a­zine” New Del­hi-India

Defence and Security Alert (DSA

 -

Bat­tle­ships like the Hood, Repulse, Bis­mar­ck etc. had ruled the seas almost till the mid­point of the Sec­ond World War. These mighty bat­tle­ships how­ev­er were com­plete­ly eclipsed by the advent of the Air­craft Car­ri­ers which have emerged since as the pri­ma­ry plat­form for pow­er pro­jec­tion across the globe. The era of the Air­craft Car­ri­er had dawned with the bril­liant­ly suc­cess­ful Japan­ese attack on the mighty Amer­i­can Naval Base at Pearl Har­bour. So emi­nent­ly suc­cess­ful was the Japan­ese Fleet’s attack that Pearl Har­bour has become a his­tor­i­cal syn­onym for shock and sur­prise in war or any con­flict­ual activ­i­ty. Sur­pris­ing­ly it was the Armed Forces of the Total­i­tar­i­an states like Ger­many and Japan that did out of the box think­ing in the Sec­ond World War and came out with high­ly inno­v­a­tive solu­tions to counter the indus­tri­al and quan­ti­ta­tive supe­ri­or­i­ty of the Allied Pow­ers. The Allied Pow­ers were all, (with the excep­tion of Sovi­et Rus­sia), lib­er­al democ­ra­cies, who the­o­ret­i­cal­ly should have fos­tered more cre­ative think­ing and inno­va­tion. It was the Ger­mans how­ev­er, who syn­the­sised the Stu­ka Dive Bombers with the fast mov­ing Panz­er Tank columns to gen­er­ate shock and awe and effect deep and paralysing pen­e­tra­tions of the blitzkreig in land war­fare. It was the Japan­ese who syn­the­sised Tac­ti­cal avi­a­tion with Sea Pow­er to pio­neer the advent of Air­craft Car­ri­ers. The Amer­i­cans, till Pearl Har­bour, had relied pri­mar­i­ly upon the tra­di­tion­al gigan­tic Bat­tle­ships to effect sea-con­trol. By a curi­ous coin­ci­dence, almost the entire Amer­i­can Bat­tle­ship fleet was sunk at Pearl Har­bour. The Amer­i­can Air­craft Car­ri­ers were not in har­bour on that par­tic­u­lar day and hence sur­vived. It was nat­ur­al there­fore, that giv­en the spec­tac­u­lar Japan­ese suc­cess with this class of ships, the Amer­i­can Car­ri­ers would lead the US Counter offen­sive across the Pacif­ic. The Amer­i­cans sim­ply had no oth­er option. The Amer­i­cans began their relent­less island hop­ping cam­paign across the Pacif­ic chain of islands as they inched clos­er to the Japan­ese main­land. The turn­ing point of the war came in the Bat­tle of Mid­way, when the Amer­i­can and Japan­ese fleets of Air­craft Car­ri­ers fought a fierce engage­ment with­out the two fleets com­ing in sight of one anoth­er. US tech­no­log­i­cal supe­ri­or­i­ty turned the scales in this relent­less bat­tle of attri­tion via the Manoeu­vre of the Car­ri­er Bat­tle Groups. The Air­craft Car­ri­er Group has since then firm­ly estab­lished itself as the pri­ma­ry instru­ment of pow­er pro­jec­tion.

Post the Sec­ond World War, the US enhanced its depen­dence on the Air­craft Car­ri­er Bat­tle Group as the pri­ma­ry tools of Pow­er Pro­jec­tion. Today, the US Navy boasts of 11 Car­ri­er Bat­tle Groups. Today such a US Nuclear pow­ered Air­craft Car­ri­er Bat­tle Group can tra­verse 5–700 nau­ti­cal miles in a day and cov­er some 5,000 Nau­ti­cal miles in a week. With its Fleet of F‑18 Hor­net air­craft, it can reach out anoth­er 3–400 nau­ti­cal miles and more and deci­sive­ly mass effects at very long dis­tances from the Amer­i­can main­land.

The Sovi­ets were a tra­di­tion­al Con­ti­nen­tal pow­er and the Sovi­et Navy there­fore focused more on Sea-denial than Sea-con­trol. This it did through a vast arma­da of nuclear and con­ven­tion­al sub­marines. How­ev­er, towards the hey­day of the Sovi­et Empire in the 1970s the Sovi­et Navy began to emu­late its Amer­i­can coun­ter­part and went in for a series of tac­ti­cal to mid-sized Air­craft Car­ri­ers like the Gor­shkov (now the Vikra­ma­ditya of the Indi­an Navy), the Veryag (now the She­lang of the Chi­nese PLA Navy) and the Kuznetsov. The Air­craft Car­ri­er had proved its util­i­ty and effi­ca­cy as an ide­al plat­form for Pow­er Pro­jec­tion.

The DFs mark a sig­nif­i­cant par­a­digm shift that could make the strat­e­gy of send­ing giant air­craft car­ri­ers more dan­ger­ous because it could give Chi­na the option of fir­ing warn­ing shots if the US ships sail too close for Chi­nese com­fort says Toshi Yoshi­wara, Prof of Strat­e­gy and Pol­i­cy at the US Naval War Col­lege

Dur­ing the cold war the Air­craft Car­ri­er played a lead role in the con­flicts in Korea and Viet­nam. After the col­lapse of the mighty Sovi­et Union, the US Car­ri­er Bat­tle Groups ranged vir­tu­al­ly unchal­lenged over the glob­al seas. They played a lead and deci­sive role in Gulf War I and Gulf War II as also Op Endur­ing Free­dom in Afghanistan and also behind the scenes in Libya. Unchal­lenged Naval pow­er and sea-lift capa­bil­i­ties alone enabled Amer­i­ca to defeat Iraq and pul­verise Afghanistan, Koso­vo and Libya.

The Tai­wan con­fronta­tion

In 1995, Chi­na had embarked on a rather aggres­sive mil­i­tary exer­cise to coerce and intim­i­date Tai­wan. It fired a bar­rage of short ranged Tac­ti­cal Bal­lis­tic mis­siles over Tai­wan to over­awe that state into call­ing off its Pro-inde­pen­dence agen­da.

The Amer­i­cans retal­i­at­ed by dis­patch­ing two Nuclear Car­ri­er Bat­tle Groups to the Tai­wan Straits. The Chi­nese were forced to back down. It was a sig­nif­i­cant humil­i­a­tion and loss of face for the Chi­nese. They resolved to ensure that this would not hap­pen ever again. The Chi­nese Navy deter­mined­ly set out to find an out of the box and inno­v­a­tive solu­tion to the threat of the US Air­craft Car­ri­er Bat­tle Groups. The solu­tion they have come up with is nov­el and quite cost-effec­tive.

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →