Egypt — Collaboration with Mubarak costs Vodafone soccer sponsorship and fans

Lit­tle did Vodafone’s Egypt unit know what it was bar­gain­ing for when it inked a three-year $9 mil­lion spon­sor­ship deal with Al Ahly SC, Egypt and Africa’s most crowned soc­cer club, whose mil­i­tant sup­port­ers were in the fore­front of the pop­u­lar upris­ing that top­pled pres­i­dent Hos­ni Mubarak and have since spear­head­ed oppo­si­tion to his mil­i­tary suc­ces­sors.

What was designed as a mar­ket­ing and pub­lic rela­tions ploy to exploit the telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions provider’s asso­ci­a­tion with an insti­tu­tion that evokes deep-seat­ed emo­tions has instead land­ed Voda­fone in hot water with Egypt­ian soc­cer fans as well as the Euro­pean par­lia­ment. Adding insult to injury, Voda­fone Egypt lost its chance to buy back some of its evap­o­rat­ed good­will among soc­cer fans when it was out­bid at the end of its spon­sor­ship con­tract in late 2011 by the Unit­ed Arab Emi­rates telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions com­pa­ny Etisalat. 

Vodafone’s expe­ri­ence has become a case study as tele­com oper­a­tors in the Mid­dle East and North Africa brace them­selves for an extend­ed peri­od of polit­i­cal volatil­i­ty in a region stretch­ing from the Atlantic coast of Africa to the Gulf that is being swept by pop­u­lar protests. 

The protests have put man­age­ment of the risk of polit­i­cal inter­fer­ence at the top of their agen­da and could call into ques­tion con­ces­sions that Black­ber­ry made in 2009 when it bowed to pres­sure ini­tial­ly from the UAE and Sau­di Ara­bia to sur­ren­der the codes for its secure instant mes­sen­ger. Vodafone’s major risk con­cern was pri­or to the anti-Mubarak protests ensur­ing the safe­ty of its per­son­nel in the case of a calami­ty or polit­i­cal upheaval. 

Vodafone’s prob­lems start­ed when it agreed ear­ly last year at the peak of the protests that oust­ed Mr. Mubarak to first sus­pend ser­vices along­side all oth­er providers, and then in con­trast to oth­ers to broad­cast pro-gov­ern­ment text mes­sages that includ­ed an announce­ment of the time and place of a demon­stra­tion by sup­port­ers of the embat­tled Egypt­ian leader. The demon­stra­tion took place on a day on which 20 peo­ple were killed in clash­es with anti-gov­ern­ment demon­stra­tors on Cairo’s Tahrir Square where mil­i­tant, high­ly politi­cized, street-bat­tle hard­ened sup­port­ers of Al Ahly and its rival Al Zamalek SC manned the pro­test­ers’ front line. 

Voda­fone, in which state-owned Tele­com Egypt (ETEL), the country’s fixed line monop­oly, has a 45 per cent stake, is feel­ing the impact of its col­lab­o­ra­tion with the Mubarak regime in its bot­tom line. “There’s still a very strong feel­ing of resent­ment and peo­ple still don’t like the role Voda­fone played,” Amr Ghar­beia, an activist at the Egypt­ian Ini­tia­tive for Per­son­al Rights in Cairo, told Bloomberg News. Mr.. Ghar­beia added that Egyp­tians have yet to see “prac­ti­cal mea­sures and reforms that guar­an­tee this is fixed,” mean­ing legal safe­guards against polit­i­cal­ly moti­vat­ed gov­ern­ment control. 

“Cut­ting the phones and inter­net meant that pro­test­ers who were being shot at could not call oth­ers and warn them about the snipers and their loca­tions,” said a soc­cer fan who was at the time on Tahrir Square. 

Protests forced Voda­fone last year to with­draw a three-minute com­mer­cial, part of an adver­tise­ment cam­paign with the slo­gan Our Pow­er, that sought to white­wash the company’s assis­tance to the Mubarak regime. The com­mer­cial fea­tured images from protest ral­lies on Tahrir Square, assert­ing that Voda­fone “did­n’t send peo­ple to the streets, we did­n’t start the rev­o­lu­tion … We only remind­ed Egyp­tians how pow­er­ful they are.” It include screen shots of Face­book and Twit­ter mes­sages post­ed by Egyp­tians sup­port­ing Voda­fone fol­lowed by an audio record­ing of Mr. Mubarak’s resignation. 

Vodafone’s acqui­si­tion of new clients has slowed in the last year to a trick­le com­pared to the peri­od pri­or to the anti-gov­ern­ment protests. While Voda­fone has seen its rev­enues ini­tial­ly go flat and since decline, France Tele­com, one of its main com­peti­tors is expand­ing its busi­ness despite polit­i­cal volatil­i­ty and Egypt’s eco­nom­ic prob­lems. The French com­pa­ny agreed last month to acquire bil­lion­aire Naguib Sawiri’s stake in its Egypt­ian wire­less oper­a­tions for $2 billion. 

Vodafone’s woes don’t stop at Egypt’s bor­ders. The Euro­pean Par­lia­ment in a bid to ensure that Euro­pean telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions providers are shield­ed from polit­i­cal pres­sures is prepar­ing to issue a report that calls for greater scruti­ny of telecom­mu­ni­ca­tion com­pa­nies. Oper­a­tors “must learn the lessons from past mis­takes, such as Vodafone’s deci­sion to give in to demands from the Egypt­ian author­i­ties in the last weeks of the Mubarak regime to sus­pend ser­vices, to dis­sem­i­nate pro-gov­ern­ment pro­pa­gan­da,” Bloomberg quot­ed the draft report as saying. 

Pop­u­lar resent­ment against Voda­fone and the loss of its soc­cer spon­sor­ship deal has prompt­ed the com­pa­ny to pre-empt the Euro­pean parliament’s advice. Voda­fone has launched a lob­by­ing cam­paign to per­suade Egypt’s first post-Mubarak par­lia­ment to adopt leg­is­la­tion that would curb state con­trol and pro­tect its invest­ments. Voda­fone is urg­ing Telia­Son­era AB and Nokia Siemens Net­works to sup­port its cam­paign. The com­pa­ny is push­ing par­lia­ment to restrict con­trol of telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions net­works to the pres­i­dent and to ensure that only he has the author­i­ty to inter­fere and only on the basis of a Cab­i­net decision. 

The pro­pos­al is designed to pre­vent a repeat of last year’s sit­u­a­tion in which Voda­fone was ordered in a tele­phone call from the secu­ri­ty ser­vices to coop­er­ate with the gov­ern­ment. Voda­fone was told it could expect a vis­it from secu­ri­ty if it failed to comply. 

“We’re lob­by­ing very hard,” said Voda­fone Egypt CEO Dowidar in a Bloomberg inter­view. He said that “no one in Egypt, not the pre­vi­ous regime, not the rev­o­lu­tion­ar­ies, not us, was pre­pared for what was hap­pen­ing” when the anti-Mubarak protests erupt­ed. Demon­stra­tors camped out on Tahrir Square for 18 days in Jan­u­ary and Feb­ru­ary of last until Mr. Mubarak had no choice but to resign after 30 years in office. 

About The Author:
James M. Dorsey is a senior fel­low at the S. Rajarat­nam School of Inter­na­tion­al Stud­ies at Nanyang Tech­no­log­i­cal Uni­ver­si­ty in Sin­ga­pore and the author of the blog, The Tur­bu­lent World of Mid­dle East Soc­cer.

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →