WikiLeaks’ Redaction Doesn’t Remove Danger, Official Says

WASHINGTON, Oct. 25, 2010 — Despite Wik­iLeaks’ attempt to redact the names of Iraqi infor­mants from its recent leak of clas­si­fied mil­i­tary reports, some of those peo­ple are still in dan­ger, a Pen­ta­gon spokesman said today.

On Oct. 22, Wik­iLeaks released more than 400,000 sen­si­tive doc­u­ments chron­i­cling mil­i­tary oper­a­tions dur­ing the Iraq war from 2004 to 2009. 

“We had iden­ti­fied 300 or so peo­ple whose names were [men­tioned in the doc­u­ments] that pos­si­bly would be put at risk if their names were pub­lished,” Pen­ta­gon spokesman Marine Corps Col. Dave Lapan said. 

Of that group, he added, the names were removed but “in a few dozen cas­es there’s still infor­ma­tion that could iden­ti­fy those people.” 

Such remain­ing infor­ma­tion includes job titles, he said. 

The U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand has the names of those poten­tial­ly at risk and “is decid­ing whether they’re going to make noti­fi­ca­tions or not,” Lapan said. 

A joint task force led by the Defense Intel­li­gence Agency is com­par­ing the orig­i­nal with redact­ed doc­u­ments, he said, to assess the dam­age that Wik­iLeaks’ pub­li­ca­tion of the clas­si­fied Iraq sig­nif­i­cant-activ­i­ties reports, called the SIGACTS data base, could pose to the U.S. mil­i­tary, Iraqi allies and cur­rent operations. 

Dur­ing an Oct. 22 State Depart­ment press brief­ing with Pak­istani For­eign Min­is­ter Mah­mood Qureshi, Sec­re­tary of State Hillary Rod­ham Clin­ton denounced the Wik­iLeaks release of sen­si­tive mil­i­tary documents. 

“We should con­demn in the most-clear terms the dis­clo­sure of any clas­si­fied infor­ma­tion by indi­vid­u­als and orga­ni­za­tions which puts the lives of Unit­ed States’ and part­ner ser­vice­mem­bers and civil­ians at risk,” she said, “threat­en­ing our nation­al secu­ri­ty and the nation­al secu­ri­ty of those with whom we are working.” 

The count of civil­ian war deaths in Iraq –- 15,000 more than report­ed by the Pen­ta­gon, accord­ing to some news reports and the non­govern­men­tal orga­ni­za­tion Iraq Body Count -– is one top­ic aris­ing from the Wik­iLeaks’ release. 

“We have reject­ed the premise that … the U.S. has not been track­ing civil­ian casu­al­ties. We have. We report that on a reg­u­lar basis to Con­gress,” Lapan said.

Also in the reports to Con­gress, he added, “We note care­ful­ly that these are not a com­plete pic­ture. … We don’t pro­fess to have knowl­edge about every civil­ian that’s killed across Iraq. We can only report on the ones that we’re aware of.” 

All reports of civil­ian casu­al­ties –- even those that put the num­ber of casu­al­ties at 15,000 more than the U.S. has report­ed — all come from the same SIGACTS data base, Lapan said. 

“The mat­ter of try­ing to esti­mate Iraqi civil­ian casu­al­ties in the war has been an ongo­ing issue,” he said, includ­ing a June report by the Con­gres­sion­al Research Service. 

“To sug­gest that there is some kind of pre­cise num­ber that some orga­ni­za­tion has, I find hard to believe,” he added, “because over the years it has been impos­si­ble for any of the var­i­ous orga­ni­za­tions that have tried to come to agree­ment on a spe­cif­ic figure.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →