USA/Pakistan — Chairman Cites Importance of U.S.-Pakistan Ties

WASHINGTON, June 29, 2010 — The Unit­ed States is work­ing hard to regain Pakistan’s trust after sev­er­al years with­out a rela­tion­ship, but it’s going to take time, the chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said yes­ter­day.

Navy Adm. Mike Mullen made the com­ments as part of an inter­view with David Sanger, New York Times chief Wash­ing­ton cor­re­spon­dent, at the inau­gur­al Aspen Secu­ri­ty Forum, part of the Aspen Insti­tute, in Col­orado.

“It’s not going to hap­pen overnight,” Mullen said of regain­ing the Pak­ista­nis’ trust. But, he added, “I’ve seen sig­nif­i­cant com­mit­ments in the whole of gov­ern­ment.”

Strong rela­tions with Pak­istan are impor­tant to stamp­ing out ter­ror­ism in Afghanistan and Pak­istan that threat­ens the Unit­ed States, Mullen said, not­ing that he recent­ly returned from his 18th trip to Pak­istan since becom­ing chair­man.

“I believe the lead­er­ship in Pak­istan rec­og­nizes the impor­tance of how it all turns out in Afghanistan,” he said. “We are in agree­ment that Afghanistan needs to be sta­ble and peace­ful. How we get there and the long-term com­mit­ment is crit­i­cal. That’s a huge part of the engage­ment strat­e­gy with Pak­istan.”

The U.S. and NATO strat­e­gy in Afghanistan is to dis­man­tle the lead­er­ship of al-Qai­da to make the ter­ror­ist group inef­fec­tive.

“And the al-Qai­da lead­er­ship resides in Pak­istan,” Mullen said.

Resum­ing U.S.-Pakistan rela­tions that end­ed in the 1990s also is impor­tant in light of Pakistan’s nuclear arse­nal, Mullen said.

“I have raised this issue with the Pak­istani mil­i­tary since Day 1,” he said. “These are the most impor­tant weapons in the Pak­istani arse­nal. That is under­stood by the lead­er­ship, and they go to extra­or­di­nary efforts to pro­tect and secure them. These are their crown jew­els. As much as we are focused on this [ter­ror­ism] threat – and the Pak­ista­nis are more than they used to be – they see a threat in India and [hav­ing nuclear weapons] is their deter­rent. They see this as a huge part of their nation­al secu­ri­ty.”

As for efforts by Iran and North Korea to obtain nuclear weapons, Mullen described a dif­fer­ent sit­u­a­tion. “There isn’t any rea­son to trust [Iran],” he said. “There is an uncer­tain­ty asso­ci­at­ed with Iran that is very con­sis­tent with Iran for a long time.”

North Korea’s desire for nuclear weapons and its increas­ing aggres­sive­ness — it sank a South Kore­an naval ship in March, killing 46 sailors — are cause for con­cern, the chair­man said. He not­ed there’s “a lot of work going on” with the Unit­ed Nations regard­ing North Korea.

“It’s dif­fi­cult to pre­dict what is going to hap­pen next,” he said, adding that he’d put North Korea “at the top of the list” of nuclear pro­lif­er­a­tion con­cerns.

It is impor­tant to con­tin­ue sanc­tions against Iran, North Korea, and oth­er coun­tries that ignore inter­na­tion­al law on nuclear weapons, Mullen said.

“The total­i­ty of the inter­na­tion­al pres­sure – polit­i­cal, diplo­mat­ic, eco­nom­ic – has con­tin­ued to be increased over time,” he said. “The over­all strat­e­gy to real­ly squeeze those pro­lif­er­a­tors has to con­tin­ue in every pos­si­ble way.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →