USA/China

US Mil­i­tary per­son­nel mobi­liza­tion

Pen­ta­gon Offi­cials Tes­ti­fy on Chi­nese Mil­i­tary Buildup By Army Staff Sgt. Michael J. Car­den
Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice

Though the Defense Depart­ment does­n’t see Chi­na as a strate­gic adver­sary, the country’s mil­i­tary buildup and lack of open­ness in how it’s going about it has offi­cials won­der­ing about Chi­nese lead­ers’ inten­tions, senior Pen­ta­gon offi­cials told the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee today.

James J. Shinn, assis­tant sec­re­tary of defense for Asian and Pacif­ic secu­ri­ty affairs, and Air Force Maj. Gen. Philip M. Breedlove, vice direc­tor for strate­gic plans and pol­i­cy for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, tes­ti­fied on the top­ic. Their tes­ti­mo­ny revolved around three key ques­tions from the Defense Department’s recent­ly sub­mit­ted Chi­na Mil­i­tary Pow­er Report:

  • What are the Chi­nese doing in terms of their mil­i­tary mod­ern­iza­tion and buildup?

  • What does it mean for the Unit­ed States and its allies in the region?

  • What are the Defense Depart­ment and the U.S. gov­ern­ment doing to react?

Accord­ing to the report, the Chi­nese have engaged in a size­able and sus­tained increase in mil­i­tary expen­di­tures over the past few years. Their offi­cial bud­get is report­ed to be about $60 bil­lion, but the Defense Depart­ment esti­mates that it’s twice that, Shinn said.

The buildup is across all of China’s ser­vices, Shinn added. “It’s com­pre­hen­sive in the sea, land and air forces. It’s also par­tic­u­lar­ly sig­nif­i­cant that it includes its nuclear as well as the con­ven­tion­al forces,” he con­tin­ued. Shinn not­ed China’s heavy invest­ment in per­son­nel, recruit­ing and train­ing, which in pre­vi­ous years was not as big a fac­tor as the over­all num­bers of its forces. The Chi­nese also are devot­ing much effort into logis­tics and the com­mand and con­trol appa­ra­tus, he said.

China’s buildup reflects a delib­er­ate and well-thought-through strat­e­gy to invest in asym­met­ric war­fare, cyber war­fare, and counter-space capa­bil­i­ties, Shinn told the House pan­el, and also has sophis­ti­cat­ed cruise mis­sile and under-sea war­fare pro­grams.

The buildup means the Unit­ed States and its allies in the region could be at risk, because the increas­ing capa­bil­i­ties may alter China’s inten­tions, which cur­rent­ly seem to be peace­ful, Shinn said. The increas­ing capac­i­ty may present the Chi­nese lead­er­ship with more options, he not­ed.

“As the Chi­nese nuclear forces increase their size and sur­viv­abil­i­ty, we don’t know if [their inten­tion] is going to alter,” he explained. “We are very care­ful about infer­ring intent as to expand­ing capa­bil­i­ty. Part of the rea­son for the deep seri­ous­ness of the report is that one must always plan for the worst.”

There­fore, he said, DoD will con­tin­ue press­ing intel­li­gence col­lec­tion and analy­sis to under­stand Chi­nese lead­ers’ inten­tions for their country’s increased capa­bil­i­ties. The Unit­ed States will con­tin­ue to train, equip and pos­ture Pacif­ic forces and work close­ly with region­al allies to strength­en their capa­bil­i­ties, he said.

Shinn also stressed the impor­tance of U.S. forces engag­ing and main­tain­ing dia­logue with the Chi­nese gov­ern­ment and lead­ers of the People’s Lib­er­a­tion Army to learn more about them and their inten­tions. The Defense Depart­ment does not cur­rent­ly see Chi­na as a strate­gic adver­sary, but rather as a com­peti­tor in some respects and a part­ner in oth­ers, he said.

“China’s rise cer­tain­ly presents a vari­ety of oppor­tu­ni­ties and chal­lenges, but the Chi­nese are def­i­nite­ly not des­tined to be an adver­sary,” he told the com­mit­tee.

Breedlove affirmed Shinn’s com­ments, not­ing that coop­er­a­tion con­tin­ues to progress between the Unit­ed States and Chi­na in areas of mutu­al inter­est such as human­i­tar­i­an assis­tance, dis­as­ter relief, and mil­i­tary envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion.

“An encour­ag­ing sign [of coop­er­a­tion] was China’s recep­tion of relief sup­plies deliv­ered to the needy Chi­nese by our mil­i­tary air­craft dur­ing this past winter’s storms and most recent earth­quake,” Breedlove said.

China’s mil­i­tary mod­ern­iza­tion is no sur­prise, giv­en the country’s impres­sive eco­nom­ic growth, the gen­er­al said.

“[The Unit­ed States] con­tin­ues to com­mu­ni­cate to Chi­na that our desire for greater trans­paren­cy and open­ness is to gain a bet­ter under­stand­ing of their strate­gic intent,” he said. “We believe it is clear­ly in the inter­est of all to avoid any mis­un­der­stand­ing or mis­cal­cu­la­tion. We con­tin­ue to watch the sit­u­a­tion close­ly and respond in a mat­ter that brings peace and sta­bil­i­ty.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →