USA — Undersecretary Outlines Cost-saving Strategy

WASHINGTON, Nov. 16, 2010 — Afford­abil­i­ty, incen­tives and pro­duc­tiv­i­ty growth are the ingre­di­ents to get the most out of the next Defense Depart­ment bud­get, a top Pen­ta­gon offi­cial said today.
The depart­ment will have to become more effi­cient to sup­port troops while the bud­get flat­tens, Ash­ton B. Carter, under­sec­re­tary for acqui­si­tion, tech­nol­o­gy, and logis­tics, told a Cen­ter for Amer­i­can Progress audi­ence here.

In the exist­ing $700 bil­lion defense bud­get, Carter said, $400 bil­lion goes to con­tract­ed goods and ser­vices. Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates wants bet­ter pro­duc­tiv­i­ty growth – or more for their mon­ey — on that $400 bil­lion, he said. 

Carter said he and Gates recent­ly co-authored a 20-page, 23-point strat­e­gy for find­ing bet­ter buy­ing pow­er in defense spend­ing. The strat­e­gy is a reflec­tion of the new, tighter bud­get era fol­low­ing a peri­od of “dou­ble-dig­it, year-after-year growth in the defense bud­get that’s been nec­es­sary by a war that’s still ongo­ing,” he said. “We need to man­age to a dif­fer­ent real­i­ty,” Carter said. 

The depart­ment must “get to the point where we have things we do want and do need,” rather than acquir­ing items that are not nec­es­sary to sup­port the troops, he said. 

Afford­abil­i­ty is key for new pro­grams and those under­way like the SSNBX nuclear mis­sile sub­ma­rine that will “age out” around 2020, Carter said. Orig­i­nal­ly, the design for each new sub­ma­rine was esti­mat­ed at $7 bil­lion in 2020 dol­lars, he said, but at that rate, a redesign would cost around $200 bil­lion over time, and “we would­n’t be able to build any ships.” “We looked at fac­tors dri­ving the costs of the sub­ma­rine, and with­out com­pro­mis­ing crit­i­cal mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties, we cut back on the design in the inter­est of afford­abil­i­ty,” Carter said. The depart­ment is on track to cut the esti­mat­ed cost for the sub­ma­rine designs by 35 percent. 

Stick­ing to what is afford­able, Carter said, “comes from dis­ci­pline, upfront, of say­ing I’m not going to pay that kind of money.’ ” 

Like­wise, “We’ll do the same for the new pres­i­den­tial heli­copter, for replac­ing the can­celled bomber, and the next gen­er­a­tion of the Army’s ground com­bat vehi­cle,” the under­sec­re­tary said. 

Carter used the joint strike fight­er as an exam­ple of a project in progress. “This is the cen­ter­piece of tac­ti­cal air mod­ern­iza­tion, the back­bone of tac­ti­cal air fleet,” he said. “Esti­ma­tors told us it would cost $50 mil­lion when the pro­gram began in 2002, but now it’s $92 mil­lion. I said ‘No, that’s not hap­pen­ing. We’ve got to get back to the orig­i­nal cost.’ ” 

Anoth­er ele­ment to save mon­ey is by giv­ing incen­tives to con­trac­tors to spur pro­duc­tiv­i­ty growth, Carter said. 

If a project’s cost comes in under bud­get, he said, the con­trac­tor and the depart­ment would share in the sav­ings, and if there’s an over-run, both share “the pain of it,” Carter said. That way, he said, “Both have incen­tives to con­trol costs and hit the cost target.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →