USA — Services Improve Diagnosis of Brain Injuries, PTSD

WASHINGTON — Bet­ter under­stand­ing of post-com­bat brain injuries and psy­cho­log­i­cal trau­ma, cou­pled with a host of mea­sures to diag­nose and treat such dis­or­ders, are pre­vent­ing ser­vice­mem­bers from being unfair­ly dis­charged due to undi­ag­nosed con­di­tions, Defense Depart­ment offi­cials told Con­gress mem­bers yes­ter­day.
Dr. Charles L. Rice, who is per­form­ing the duties of the assis­tant sec­re­tary of defense for health affairs, acknowl­edged that such prob­lems exist­ed ear­ly in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but said the ser­vices had alle­vi­at­ed the prob­lem with improved under­stand­ing and out­reach to treat post-trau­mat­ic stress dis­or­der and trau­mat­ic brain injury. “There were con­cerns ear­ly in the con­flicts that mem­bers suf­fer­ing PTSD or TBI might be sep­a­rat­ed under the non-com­pens­able, exclu­sive diag­no­sis of a per­son­al­i­ty dis­or­der,” Rice said in tes­ti­mo­ny before the House Armed Ser­vices Committee’s mil­i­tary per­son­nel sub­com­mit­tee. “Such con­cerns were rea­son­able, giv­en our nascent under­stand­ing of these sig­na­ture injuries.”

Rice — who also serves as pres­i­dent of the Uni­formed Ser­vices Uni­ver­si­ty of the Health Sci­ences and act­ing direc­tor of the Tri­care Man­age­ment Activ­i­ty — tes­ti­fied along with William J. Carr, deputy under­sec­re­tary of defense for mil­i­tary per­son­nel pol­i­cy. They told the sub­com­mit­tee about how the ser­vices are imple­ment­ing a new law – Sec­tion 512 of the 2010 Defense Autho­riza­tion Act – requir­ing them to con­duct med­ical exams before sep­a­rat­ing a com­bat vet­er­an under less-than-hon­or­able con­di­tions.

“As the body of knowl­edge of PTSD and TBI has matured, per­son­nel poli­cies have also evolved to ensure ser­vice­mem­bers are thor­ough­ly eval­u­at­ed pri­or to con­sid­er­a­tion of dis­charge from mil­i­tary ser­vice,” Rice and Carr said in a joint state­ment sub­mit­ted to the sub­com­mit­tee. “The department’s sep­a­ra­tion poli­cies offer many lev­els of over­sight to pro­tect against inap­pro­pri­ate dis­charge.”

Rice read the state­ment out­lin­ing steps the depart­ment and ser­vices are tak­ing to avoid dis­charg­ing some­one for undi­ag­nosed con­di­tions masked as behav­ioral prob­lems. They include: — Award­ing more than $500 mil­lion in research stud­ies on trau­mat­ic brain injuries and psy­cho­log­i­cal health;

— Invest­ing in pre-deploy­ment resilien­cy train­ing;

— Con­duct­ing acute con­cus­sion screen­ing for all patients evac­u­at­ed from com­bat the­aters with head and neck injuries; — An effort to revamp pre- and post-deploy­ment screen­ings to make them more com­pre­hen­sive;

— A new pro­gram designed to help pri­ma­ry care providers rec­og­nize warn­ing signs of PTSD;

— Manda­to­ry phys­i­cal exams with­in 12 months of a servicemember’s sep­a­ra­tion – a depart­ment pol­i­cy adopt­ed in Octo­ber 2005 – that are waived only with the con­sent of both the ser­vice­mem­ber and the unit com­man­der;

— The addi­tion of more than 2,000 men­tal health providers to mil­i­tary treat­ment facil­i­ties, with plans to imple­ment a new mod­el to bet­ter deter­mine staffing needs; and

— Estab­lish­ing direc­tor of psy­cho­log­i­cal health posi­tions in mil­i­tary units, and the 2006 cre­ation of the Cen­ter for Deploy­ment Psy­chol­o­gy at the Uni­formed Ser­vices Uni­ver­si­ty of the Health Sci­ences.

In addi­tion, Rice said, the depart­ment and ser­vices have done much to reduce the stig­ma attached to seek­ing men­tal health treat­ment, and have cre­at­ed more and improved ways for ser­vice­mem­bers and their fam­i­lies to access self-help resources, such as a web­site called www.afterdeployment.org, and the abil­i­ty to receive psy­chi­a­try ser­vices through phone calls.

New Jer­sey Rep. Bill Pascrell, co-chair of the Con­gres­sion­al Brain Injury Task Force and a mem­ber of the sub­com­mit­tee, said an esti­mat­ed 360,000 vet­er­ans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, or 20 per­cent, are believed to return with brain injuries. He called it “absolute­ly inad­e­quate” to not have a con­sis­tent met­ric to eval­u­ate them before and after deploy­ment. In response, Rice said pre- and post-deploy­ment tests are incon­sis­tent because pro­fes­sion­als who assess brain injuries dis­agree about the best eval­u­a­tion tools.

“There is no gold-stan­dard diag­nos­tic study for TBI,” he said, adding that the depart­ment has part­nered with the Nation­al Insti­tute for Men­tal Health to deter­mine if bio­log­i­cal mark­ers or some oth­er indi­ca­tors can improve the tests’ valid­i­ty.

“If we take a screen­ing test, what do we mea­sure it against? What is the yard­stick?” Rice said. “I believe all three ser­vices have engaged their experts in intense dis­cus­sion about what the right psy­cho­me­t­ric eval­u­a­tion should be and the right tools to deploy it.”

Defense Depart­ment offi­cials plan to release a report June 25 to update how the ser­vices will meet the new man­date, Carr said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →