USA — Repeal Would Require Training, Press Secretary Says

WASHINGTON, Dec. 1, 2010 — Train­ing and edu­ca­tion are key fac­tors to over­com­ing resis­tance in the ranks if Con­gress repeals the law ban­ning gays from serv­ing open­ly in the mil­i­tary, Pen­ta­gon Press Sec­re­tary Geoff Mor­rell said today.
Mor­rell told MSNBC’s Chuck Todd and Savan­nah Guthrie that while some resis­tance exists among ser­vice­mem­bers, espe­cial­ly in com­bat units, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates does­n’t see it as insur­mount­able.

Offi­cials yes­ter­day released the report of a work­ing group Gates appoint­ed to inves­ti­gate the ram­i­fi­ca­tions of a pos­si­ble repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law. Though the pan­el found that the over­all risk asso­ci­at­ed with repeal would be low, Mor­rell said, it also cit­ed a need for train­ing and edu­cat­ing the force to be pre­pared for the change. 

“If we take the mea­sures that are out­lined in the report — that is, train­ing and edu­cat­ing the force to be pre­pared for this dra­mat­ic change — the sec­re­tary believes that although there clear­ly is some ret­i­cence among the com­bat arms units, those who have been fight­ing and dying over the past decade, it is not insur­mount­able, and that with the prop­er train­ing and edu­ca­tion, we can over­come that,” Mor­rell said. 

Cit­ing results of a sur­vey the work­ing group sent to 400,000 active and reserve-com­po­nent ser­vice­mem­bers, Mor­rell not­ed that 80 to 90 per­cent of ser­vice­mem­bers who believe they have served with a gay ser­vice­mem­ber in a com­bat arms unit believe it has had a very good, good or nei­ther good nor bad impact on their unit. 

“So there are many sta­tis­tics in here, none of which we believe to be evi­denc­ing such prob­lems that we can­not over­come them with train­ing or edu­ca­tion,” he said. 

The work­ing group also sur­veyed fam­i­ly mem­bers, and Mor­rell said get­ting a full range of input from mil­i­tary soci­ety was impor­tant for the work­ing group in deter­min­ing the best course of action should there be a repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law. 

“Until we know the atti­tudes of the force — both the ser­vice­mem­bers and their fam­i­lies — we don’t know pre­cise­ly what the issues are that we have to address through train­ing and edu­ca­tion,” he said. 

The sur­veys, he added, helped to pro­vide the nec­es­sary road map. 

“We need­ed to sur­vey the force to fig­ure out what they were most con­cerned about [and] where we need the most work in terms of edu­cat­ing and train­ing,” Mor­rell said. “What are going to be the biggest obsta­cles to a suc­cess­ful, least-dis­rup­tive change in this pol­i­cy? We would not have known that had we not spent the last nine months and solicit­ed 225,000 inputs from the force and their families.” 

The deci­sion to sur­vey the opin­ions and atti­tudes of ser­vice­mem­bers and their fam­i­lies was not about putting the ques­tion to a vote, Mor­rell said. Rather, he explained, it was about find­ing out what chal­lenges the Defense Depart­ment would face if Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s stat­ed desire to repeal the law –- echoed by Gates and by Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff -– comes to pass. 

“The pres­i­dent has made his posi­tion clear,” Mor­rell said. “The sec­re­tary [and] the chair­man endorse it. Now we need to find out if the Con­gress acts on it, how best to go about imple­ment­ing this change.” 

The House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives has passed leg­is­la­tion that would repeal the law once the pres­i­dent, the sec­re­tary of defense and the chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff cer­ti­fy in writ­ing that new Defense Depart­ment reg­u­la­tions and poli­cies relat­ed to repeal are con­sis­tent with unit cohe­sion, reten­tion and recruitment. 

The leg­is­la­tion requires Sen­ate action before the pres­i­dent can sign it into law. Mor­rell would­n’t spec­u­late as to whether the Sen­ate would act, but reit­er­at­ed the view Gates and Mullen have stat­ed repeat­ed­ly that con­gres­sion­al repeal would be prefer­able to a court sim­ply strik­ing down the law. 

“The big fear here is that the courts take action and we are forced to do this pre­cip­i­tous­ly, and that would be dis­rup­tive,” Mor­rell said. “The leg­is­la­tion as cur­rent­ly con­sti­tut­ed requires cer­ti­fi­ca­tion from the sec­re­tary, the chair­man and the pres­i­dent, which gives us the time to train and edu­cate the force.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →