USA — Petraeus Describes Changes in Army Structure, Doctrine

WASHINGTON, May 7, 2010 — The Army’s con­ver­sion to a mod­u­lar com­bat brigade struc­ture in the years imme­di­ate­ly pre­ced­ing the surge of forces into Iraq was a key fac­tor in the strategy’s suc­cess, the com­man­der of U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand said here yes­ter­day.

Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander of U.S. Central Command
Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, com­man­der of U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand, gives the keynote speech for the Amer­i­can Enter­prise Insti­tute for Pub­lic Pol­i­cy Research annu­al din­ner and gala March 6, 2010, at the Nation­al Build­ing Muse­um in Wash­ing­ton, D.C. Petraeus received the Irv­ing Kris­tol Award, the institute’s top hon­or, which rec­og­nized intel­lec­tu­al and prac­ti­cal con­tri­bu­tions to gov­ern­ment pol­i­cy, social wel­fare or polit­i­cal under­stand­ing.
DoD pho­to by Army Sgt. 1st Class Michael J. Car­den
Click to enlarge

“As I have not­ed on sev­er­al occa­sions, the most impor­tant surge in Iraq was not the surge of forces,” Army Gen. David H. Petraeus said in a keynote address to the Amer­i­can Enter­prise Insti­tute for Pub­lic Pol­i­cy Research. “Rather, it was the surge of ideas that guid­ed the employ­ment of our forces in Iraq.”

Petraeus – who com­mand­ed U.S. forces in Iraq dur­ing the surge – received the Irv­ing Kris­tol Award at the institute’s annu­al din­ner and gala.

The gen­er­al recount­ed the events and process­es that led to the Army’s trans­for­ma­tion from a divi­sion-cen­tric to brigade-cen­tric fight­ing force, not­ing that the mod­u­lar-brigade con­cept changed the way forces deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Trans­for­ma­tion is a part of the Army’s recent his­to­ry that’s “near and dear” to his heart, Petraeus said. The peri­od from 2005 to 2006, when brigade com­bat teams were equipped and manned to func­tion more inde­pen­dent­ly, he said, does­n’t receive the cred­it it deserves for the Army’s suc­cess in Iraq and progress in Afghanistan.

The surge proved crit­i­cal to progress in Iraq, Petraeus said, how­ev­er, he not­ed that the Army’s peri­od of trans­for­ma­tion pre-dat­ed the surge. “Indeed, it was dur­ing this peri­od that we devel­oped the intel­lec­tu­al under­pin­ning that proved so crit­i­cal when addi­tion­al forces were deployed to Iraq in 2007,” he said.

With­out those ideas and new think­ing about coun­terin­sur­gency oper­a­tions, U.S. forces would not have been suc­cess­ful in the surge, Petraeus said. The efforts that insti­tu­tion­al­ized those ideas “touched all aspects of our Army” through a gen­er­a­tional trans­for­ma­tion, he added.

Much has changed in the way the Army oper­ates on and off the bat­tle­field, the gen­er­al said, includ­ing doc­trine, the way lead­ers are edu­cat­ed, how forces are trained, and how the Army builds on lessons learned. He also not­ed the Army’s shift from divi­sion rehearsal exer­cis­es pri­or to deploy­ments to three-week tours by brigade com­bat teams to joint readi­ness train­ing cen­ters in Cal­i­for­nia, Louisiana or Ger­many.

The Army worked tire­less­ly to pro­vide real­is­tic train­ing for troops to pre­pare deploy­ing units for the con­stant­ly evolv­ing insur­gent threats, he said.

All of the Army’s changes have “had far-reach­ing impli­ca­tions for the con­duct in our oper­a­tions in Iraq, and most recent­ly, in Afghanistan,” the gen­er­al said.

Petraeus also rec­og­nized ser­vice­mem­bers and mil­i­tary lead­ers for their com­mit­ment in putting those ideas into prac­tice. He recalled how the coali­tion was strug­gling in Iraq in 2004. Despite some progress at that time, the insur­gency still spread, and by 2006, sec­tar­i­an vio­lence began to grow at an alarm­ing rate. Polit­i­cal progress in Iraq then was at a vir­tu­al stand­still, he said.

When the surge of forces arrived in 2007, troops focused on secur­ing the pop­u­la­tion by liv­ing near the com­mu­ni­ties in com­bat out­posts, rather than com­mut­ing to the fight from larg­er bases, he said. Troops fos­tered rec­on­cil­i­a­tion when pos­si­ble, relent­less­ly pur­sued al-Qai­da and sup­port­ed civ­il-mil­i­tary efforts.

The increased num­ber of troops and their train­ing enabled suc­cess, he said. And although the mis­sion in Iraq “got hard­er before it got eas­i­er,” the gen­er­al added, coali­tion and Iraqi forces were able to reduce vio­lence by more than 90 per­cent. Improved secu­ri­ty allowed for infra­struc­ture repairs, revival of the econ­o­my and the process of Iraqi elec­tions – “all of which gave rise to new hope,” he said.

“This hope was cre­at­ed as a result of the changes our Army, togeth­er with the oth­er ser­vices, made in 2006 that enabled the sub­se­quent imple­men­ta­tion of our big ideas in Iraq in 2007,” he said. “This was the process that enabled the real surge in Iraq – the surge of ideas. Armed with and trained on these ideas, lead­ers and troop­ers who got it about coun­terin­sur­gency deployed to Iraq and enabled the progress we’ve seen there over the past three years.”

War calls for con­stant learn­ing and adap­tion, espe­cial­ly in a coun­terin­sur­gency fight, Petraeus said. But mil­i­tary lead­ers and ser­vice­mem­bers still have much to learn, he acknowl­edged.

“The side that learns and adapts the fastest often pre­vails,” he said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →