USA — Pentagon Launches Probe into Document Leaks

WASHINGTON, July 27, 2010 — The Pen­ta­gon has launched an inves­ti­ga­tion to find out how thou­sands of clas­si­fied mil­i­tary doc­u­ments were leaked to the group WikiLeaks.org, a Defense Depart­ment spokesman said.

The Army’s Crim­i­nal Inves­ti­ga­tion Divi­sion, also known as CID, is head­ing the inves­ti­ga­tion, Marine Corps Col. Dave Lapan told Pen­ta­gon reporters today.

“An inves­ti­ga­tion has been ini­ti­at­ed, [and] Army CID has the lead,” Lapan said.

Hav­ing the Army take charge of the inves­ti­ga­tion does­n’t sug­gest that Army per­son­nel are respon­si­ble for the leaks, Lapan explained. CID was cho­sen for its capa­bil­i­ties in such mat­ters, he said.

“[CID] is an inves­tiga­tive agency that has the abil­i­ty, the capa­bil­i­ty, to do these types of things,” Lapan said. “There are a num­ber of inves­tiga­tive agen­cies [with­in the Pen­ta­gon], but the deci­sion was made that Army CID takes the lead.”

Army CID, he said, also is inves­ti­gat­ing the case of Army Spc. Bradley Man­ning, who has been charged with leak­ing a video of a U.S. heli­copter attack in Iraq to Wik­iLeaks. The doc­u­ment leaks inves­ti­ga­tion is a con­tin­u­a­tion or exten­sion of the exist­ing open inves­ti­ga­tion on Man­ning, Lapan said.

How­ev­er, he added, the doc­u­ment leak inves­ti­ga­tion is “broad­er” than the Man­ning case.

“The cur­rent inves­ti­ga­tion into the leak of the doc­u­ments to Wik­iLeaks isn’t focused on any one, spe­cif­ic indi­vid­ual,” Lapan said. “It’s much broad­er. They’re going to look every­where to deter­mine what the source may be.”

In an inter­view broad­cast today on a seg­ment of MSNBC’s “The Dai­ly Run­down” tele­vi­sion news show, Pen­ta­gon Press Sec­re­tary Geoff Mor­rell said that Man­ning “is a per­son of inter­est with regards to this leak, but we just don’t know at this point.”

Mor­rell said the ques­tion was posed to Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates recent­ly about chang­ing the way the Pen­ta­gon shares infor­ma­tion with uni­formed mem­bers. Gates, he said, does­n’t believe that that sort of adjust­ment is nec­es­sary.

“What makes our mil­i­tary the envy of the world is that we entrust the most-junior offi­cers, the most-junior enlist­ed with incred­i­ble amounts of respon­si­bil­i­ty,” Mor­rell said. “[Gates] does­n’t want to alter that dynam­ic, that trust ele­ment that exists because of one or two ‘bad seeds.’ ”

The answer, Mor­rell said, is “to go after the ‘bad actors,’ hold them respon­si­ble, pros­e­cute them to the fullest extent of the law, but don’t change the fun­da­men­tal trust­ing rela­tion­ship that makes the mil­i­tary so effec­tive.”

The doc­u­ments, report­ed­ly giv­en to sev­er­al U.S. and inter­na­tion­al media weeks ago, are said to detail field reports from Afghanistan, as well as alleged Pak­istani part­ner­ship with the Tal­iban. The more than 90,000 doc­u­ments cov­er the peri­od from Jan­u­ary 2004 through Decem­ber 2009, accord­ing to news reports.

Mor­rell refut­ed ques­tions about Pak­istan being a ques­tion­able ally, say­ing Pak­istan is a sov­er­eign nation with its own inter­ests. The U.S. mil­i­tary is thank­ful, he said, that Pakistan’s inter­est in elim­i­nat­ing ter­ror­ists coin­cides with that of the Unit­ed States.

“We are aligned in that respect,” Mor­rell said of the U.S.-Pakistan rela­tion­ship. “But we each have our own inter­ests here that we have to bal­ance and work through. We think we’re mak­ing a lot of progress there, but we’re not alone in the driver’s seat.

“As Sec­re­tary Gates says, we’re in the pas­sen­ger seat. They’re at the wheel,” Mor­rell con­tin­ued. “They deter­mine the direc­tion and the pace, but we’re going to be their part­ner in this effort.”

On ques­tions regard­ing the doc­u­ments’ out­lin­ing of mis­cues in Afghanistan, Mor­rell said the Unit­ed States effort there is long term and mov­ing in the right direc­tion. Although civil­ian casu­al­ties there are a con­cern, he said, the num­bers are down by a third this year, while the civil­ian casu­al­ties tak­en at the hands of the Tal­iban has near­ly dou­bled. Mor­rell not­ed “rules of engage­ment” changes U.S. and inter­na­tion­al forces made a year ago when for­mer com­man­der of forces in Afghanistan Army Gen. Stan­ley A. McChrys­tal took the helm.

“Gen­er­al McChrys­tal, when he came in, insti­tut­ed this tac­ti­cal direc­tive which has seen civil­ian casu­al­ties, due to our forces and coali­tion forces [efforts], plum­met by a third this year,” Mor­rell said. Mean­while, he said, Afghan civil­ian casu­al­ties caused by the Tal­iban [casu­al­ties] are up by about 90 per­cent.

Turn­ing back to the Wik­iLeaks sit­u­a­tion, Mor­rell not­ed that the Pentagon’s inves­ti­ga­tion of the leaked doc­u­ments con­tin­ues.

“To the issue of whether it’s dam­aged oper­a­tional secu­ri­ty or endan­gered our forces, we’re still try­ing to get our arms around that,” he said. “We’ve got a team work­ing around the clock going through them bit by bit to try to see is there any infor­ma­tion in there that could imper­il our forces, our coali­tion part­ners, the civil­ians who are on the bat­tle­field with us.

“And are there any things in there that could jeop­ar­dize our oper­a­tions or our nation’s secu­ri­ty?” he con­tin­ued. “We just don’t know at this point.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →