USA / Pakistan

U.S.-Pakistani Rela­tions Can Make ‘Strate­gic Hedge’ Moot, Top Offi­cials Say

WASHINGTON, May 18, 2009 — Pakistan’s uncer­tain­ty about the future out­come of the war in neigh­bor­ing Afghanistan moti­vates its intel­li­gence ser­vice to keep ties to the Tal­iban as a strate­gic hedge, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates said. 

Gates com­ment­ed on Pakistan’s intel­li­gence agency, known as the ISI, and its sup­port for insur­gents in Afghanistan and Pak­istan dur­ing an inter­view that aired yes­ter­day on CBS’ “60 Minutes.” 

“Their main­tain­ing con­tact with these groups, in my view, is a strate­gic hedge. They’re not sure who’s going to win in Afghanistan,” he said. “They’re not sure what’s going to hap­pen along that bor­der area. So to a cer­tain extent, they play both sides.” 

On the heels of the Afghanistan-Pak­istan strat­e­gy that Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s admin­is­tra­tion released in late March, Gates and oth­er top defense offi­cials have expressed con­cern over the rela­tion­ship. But both the defense sec­re­tary and Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, have sug­gest­ed that stronger and endur­ing U.S. engage­ment with Pak­istan can lead to a dis­tanc­ing between the ISI and insur­gent elements. 

Under­scor­ing the his­to­ry of the rela­tion­ship, Gates said Pak­istan and Afghanistan-based insur­gent groups estab­lished con­tact more than two decades ago when U.S.-backed fight­ers clashed with Sovi­et forces. But he empha­sized that present-day insur­gents threat­en Pakistan’s cap­i­tal of Islamabad. 

“What we need to do is try and help the Pak­ista­nis under­stand these groups are now an exis­ten­tial threat to them, and that we will be there as a stead­fast ally for Pak­istan, that they can count on us, and that they don’t need that hedge,” Gates said in a March 29 inter­view on “Fox News Sunday.” 

Mullen, who has pre­vi­ous­ly empha­sized the need for the ISI to change its strate­gic approach, spoke fur­ther today about the bur­geon­ing rela­tion­ship between the Unit­ed States and Pak­istan, which he said is “just beginning.” 

“The ques­tion I get when I go to Afghanistan and Pak­istan rou­tine­ly is, ‘Are you stick­ing around this time?’ ” he told an audi­ence at the Brook­ings Insti­tu­tion here. “I think it’s a valid ques­tion, and until that ques­tion is answered – and those coun­tries know and the cit­i­zens know that our intent is to have a long-term rela­tion­ship with them, not just a mil­i­tary rela­tion­ship – I think that ques­tion will con­tin­ue to be out there.” 

Mullen said he’s “cau­tious­ly opti­mistic” that with time and patience, the Unit­ed States will show that it has fol­lowed through on its ini­tial com­mit­ment to Pak­istan. He added that the Unit­ed States must appre­ci­ate the his­to­ry of the rela­tion­ships between and among tribes and oth­er region­al enti­ties as Amer­i­can engage­ment develops. 

“That will dri­ve strate­gies in those coun­tries that often­times hedge against the pos­si­bil­i­ty that we might leave,” he said. “So it’s going to take us some time and some patience to answer those par­tic­u­lar questions.” 

By John J. Kruzel
Amer­i­can Forces Press Service 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →