USA — Official Calls Wounded Warriors Report ‘Unrepresentative’

WASHINGTON, April 26, 2010 — The focus of a New York Times arti­cle depict­ing neglect and suf­fer­ing endured by a group of wound­ed sol­diers recov­er­ing in an Army pro­gram is unrep­re­sen­ta­tive of the recov­ery effort at large, the Army sur­geon gen­er­al said today.

Lt. Gen. (Dr.) Eric B. Schoomak­er stopped short of the call­ing the arti­cle that appeared yes­ter­day inac­cu­rate, but said the over­whelm­ing major­i­ty of sol­diers in war­rior tran­si­tion units are sat­is­fied with the recov­ery reg­i­men, accord­ing to an Army survey. 

“I don’t see them as nec­es­sar­i­ly craft­ing fic­tion,” Schoomak­er said to Pen­ta­gon reporters about the arti­cle. “But I do believe that it is whol­ly unrep­re­sen­ta­tive of the total­i­ty and the con­text of what we’ve done for war­rior care, espe­cial­ly in the last three years.” 

Over­all, 81 per­cent of par­tic­i­pat­ing sol­diers are sat­is­fied with the pro­gram, and about 90 per­cent of wound­ed sol­diers recov­er­ing at Fort Car­son, Colo. — the focal point of the New York Times arti­cle — are sat­is­fied with their war­rior tran­si­tion unit accord­ing to the sur­vey, Schoomak­er said. 

These fig­ures paint a pic­ture in stark con­trast to the New York Times report, which the paper said was based on inter­views with more than a dozen sol­diers and health care pro­fes­sion­als from Fort Carson’s tran­si­tion unit and reports from oth­er Army posts. The arti­cle states that war­rior tran­si­tion units have become “ware­hous­es of despair” for many soldiers. 

The Army sur­geon gen­er­al took umbrage at this por­tray­al of war­rior tran­si­tion units — which are respon­si­ble for some 9,300 sol­diers — call­ing it “a poor char­ac­ter­i­za­tion” and “almost 180 degrees of the truth.” 

Schoomak­er was asked specif­i­cal­ly to com­ment on the report’s descrip­tion of the units as “ware­hous­es of despair, where dam­aged men and women are kept out of sight, fed a diet of pow­er­ful pre­scrip­tion pills and treat­ed harsh­ly by non­com­mis­sioned officers.” 

“Of all of the descrip­tions in there, with the excep­tion per­haps of the suf­fer­ing that indi­vid­ual sol­diers and fam­i­lies have had,” he said, “that sen­tence alone is among the most offen­sive to us. And I think it whol­ly describes a sit­u­a­tion that we feel is not present. 

“We wel­come you and any mem­ber of the press to go out and phys­i­cal­ly vis­it war­rior tran­si­tion units,” he con­tin­ued, “to talk with those sol­diers, to talk with their cadre and to see the larg­er con­text of how care is being delivered.” 

The arti­cle raised con­cerns about the over-pre­scrip­tion of drugs by doc­tors and the abuse or mis­use of both pre­scribed and illic­it sub­stances. A mil­i­tary offi­cial told reporters that 78 inci­dents of ille­gal drug use have been record­ed at the Fort Car­son war­rior tran­si­tion unit since 2008. 

“We have con­cerns about the diver­sion of pre­scrip­tion drugs that can be used for recre­ation­al uses, just as in the nation at large,” Schoomak­er said. “That’s a big prob­lem right now across the coun­try. We’re also con­cerned because ille­gal­ly obtained drugs can be used as com­ple­ments to these oth­er drugs.” 

Schoomak­er said an inspec­tion of war­rior tran­si­tion units by the Army inspec­tor gen­er­al will be com­plet­ed soon, and Army Brig. Gen. Gary Cheek, com­man­der of War­rior Tran­si­tion Com­mand, is slat­ed to vis­it Fort Car­son to review poli­cies and prac­tices of their war­rior tran­si­tion unit lat­er this week. 

“With 9,300 sol­diers cur­rent­ly in the pro­gram, we don’t always get it right,” Schoomak­er said. “To that end, we take every crit­i­cism and con­cern seri­ous­ly and con­tin­u­ous­ly strive to improve our program.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →