USA — No More C‑17s, Defense Officials Tell Congress

WASHINGTON, July 13, 2010 — The mil­i­tary has more than enough large trans­port planes, and the appro­pri­a­tion of any more in the next bud­get year will force some into pre­ma­ture retire­ment, Defense Depart­ment offi­cials told a con­gres­sion­al pan­el today.

“We have enough C‑17s,” Mike McCord, prin­ci­pal deputy under­sec­re­tary of defense (comp­trol­ler), said. “Mon­ey spent on things we don’t need takes away from those we do need.”

Along with McCord, Air Force Maj. Gen. Susan Y. Des­jardins, direc­tor of strate­gic plans for Air Mobil­i­ty Com­mand, and Alan Estevez, prin­ci­pal deputy assis­tant sec­re­tary of defense for logis­ti­cal and materiel readi­ness, repeat­ed Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates’ posi­tion against the pur­chase of more C‑17s to the Sen­ate Com­mit­tee on Home­land Secu­ri­ty and Gov­ern­ment Affairs’ fed­er­al finan­cial man­age­ment sub­com­mit­tee.

All three defense offi­cials agreed with the subcommittee’s lead­ers, Sens. Thomas Carp­er and John McCain, that the C‑17, in addi­tion to the C‑5, has been crit­i­cal to air­lift in and out of Iraq and Afghanistan. How­ev­er, they said, the military’s cur­rent fleet of 223 C‑17s and 111 C‑5s is more than enough air­lift capa­bil­i­ty for years to come.

A depart­ment study that con­clud­ed in Feb­ru­ary was con­sis­tent with two oth­er stud­ies that found that the cur­rent fleet is suf­fi­cient “even in the most demand­ing envi­ron­ments” to take the mil­i­tary through 2016, McCord said. The old­est plane in the trans­port fleet, Lockheed’s C‑5A Galaxy, will be viable until 2025, and the fleet as a whole should last until 2040, he said.

The depart­ment has not request­ed C‑17s, built by Boe­ing, since the fis­cal 2007 bud­get, yet Con­gress has added them every year since, spend­ing about $1.25 bil­lion on C‑17s “that we don’t want or need,” said McCord, a 21-year staff mem­ber of the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee before his cur­rent appoint­ment.

Any addi­tion­al appro­pri­a­tion for C‑17s will have to be off­set by retir­ing some of the military’s old­er – but still viable — trans­port planes, the defense offi­cials said.

And, the defense offi­cials said, adding force struc­ture such as air­craft always entails addi­tion­al costs in train­ing, main­te­nance, and infra­struc­ture, such as new hangars, bases and tool­ing. The depart­ment spends about $50,000 per air­craft per year to store air­craft where spare parts are avail­able, Des­jardins said.

“It’s the gift that keeps on giv­ing, because if you give it to us, we’ll main­tain it,” Estevez said.

It would be more cost-effec­tive, the defense offi­cials said, to mod­i­fy the C‑5M for longer via­bil­i­ty to con­tin­ue to work in con­junc­tion with the C‑17.

Des­jardins called the C‑17 the “back­bone” of the air mobil­i­ty fleet, and said the C‑5’s com­bi­na­tion of long range, high capac­i­ty and capa­bil­i­ty to car­ry out­size car­go is unequaled. Togeth­er, she said, “they meet the needs for car­go and capac­i­ty any­where in the world.”

Retir­ing the least-capa­ble C‑5s would save about $320 mil­lion, Des­jardins said.

“Mak­ing trade­offs of two types of air­craft when we already have more than enough of both is not going be cost effec­tive,” McCord said.

Asked what the depart­ment would cut to accom­mo­date any new C‑17s, McCord said that would depend on how many new C‑17s were bought. “You and Con­gress would decide that,” he said, “because you would cut from our bud­get about $300 mil­lion for every C‑17 added.”

“We have a good mix right now,” Estevez said. “Replace­ment is def­i­nite­ly not the most cost-effec­tive way. Buy­ing more to retire more is cer­tain­ly not the way the depart­ment needs to bal­ance its resources.”

The defense sec­re­tary has made that case to Con­gress, and Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma has promised to veto any leg­is­la­tion that pro­vides for more C‑17s.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →