USA — Navy Official Discusses Climate Change Investment Strategy

WASHINGTON, June 21, 2010 — A num­ber of recent strate­gic Defense Depart­ment doc­u­ments have rec­og­nized that the chang­ing cli­mate may affect nation­al secu­ri­ty and mil­i­tary oper­a­tions lat­er in the cen­tu­ry.

This is par­tic­u­lar­ly true for the glob­al­ly deployed U.S. Navy, and invest­ments to address cli­mate chal­lenges may need to be made, the service’s oceanog­ra­ph­er said in a June 18 “DoD Live” blog­gers roundtable. 

“We’re going to have to fold these chal­lenges into a tight fis­cal bud­get,” acknowl­edged Navy Rear Adm. David W. Tit­ley, who also serves as direc­tor of the Navy’s Task Force Cli­mate Change. He explained that it is impor­tant not only to know what invest­ments are right to meet future require­ments, but also to know when to make them. 

“We want to basi­cal­ly pace the threat,” Tit­ley said. “We don’t want to get into a tail chase over cli­mate change, but at the same time, … we do not want to spend ahead of need, spend­ing for things that may not be required for years or decades later.” 

Tit­ley explained that to define the scope of need­ed invest­ments the Navy will con­duct capa­bil­i­ties-based assess­ments, which he described as foun­da­tion­al stud­ies to deter­mine the require­ments for such things as force struc­ture, infra­struc­ture, com­mand and con­trol and com­mu­ni­ca­tions. “We’re doing one of these capa­bil­i­ties-based assess­ments for cli­mate change in gen­er­al, and anoth­er one focused specif­i­cal­ly on the Arc­tic,” he said. 

Tit­ley said the assess­ments were timed to coin­cide with the Navy’s pro­gram objec­tive mem­o­ran­dum for fis­cal 2014. POMs are annu­al events in which crit­i­cal deci­sions on the bud­get and invest­ment spend­ing are made. Tit­ley said he believes the 2014 bud­get is where the first cli­mate-change invest­ments may poten­tial­ly be made. 

“One of the invest­ments we’re real­ly going to have to think about in the next sev­er­al decades is the impact of sea lev­el rise on the Navy’s infra­struc­ture,” Tit­ley said. “That includes our ports and piers in the con­ti­nen­tal Unit­ed States, but we also need to think about bases we use in con­junc­tion with our part­ners and allies overseas.” 

As an exam­ple, Tit­ley men­tioned Diego Gar­cia, a small, low-lying island in the Indi­an Ocean that hosts a strate­gic airfield. 

“The obser­va­tions have shown us that through the 20th cen­tu­ry, sea lev­el rose by an aver­age of two mil­lime­ters per year,” Tit­ley said. “So that means over the course of the cen­tu­ry, we had about 20 cen­time­ters, or rough­ly eight inch­es, of sea lev­el rise. The sea lev­el rise we’ve seen in the first 10 years of the new cen­tu­ry is already 50 per­cent greater than the aver­age sea lev­el rise in the 20th century.” 

Tit­ley explained that as the oceans get warmer, they expand and take up more space, caus­ing the sea lev­el to rise. In addi­tion, the land-based ice that already is melt­ing — includ­ing moun­tain glac­i­ers, the Green­land ice field, and even the west­ern Antarc­tic ice sheet — will add vol­ume to the ocean. He acknowl­edged con­sid­er­able uncer­tain­ty over the time line and extent of sea lev­el rise, but he not­ed that lead­ing cli­mate sci­en­tists believe sea lev­els could rise as much as six feet by the end of the century. 

“How prob­a­ble is this?” Tit­ley asked. “I’m not real­ly sure right now, but I am sure there are sig­nif­i­cant con­se­quences. We need to make sure, as time goes by, that we under­stand it, we have a plan, and we know what it will cost us to exe­cute that plan. 

“That’s real­ly one of the foun­da­tion­al ele­ments the task force is going to pur­sue,” he added. 

In response to a ques­tion on spe­cif­ic infra­struc­ture upgrades, Tit­ley not­ed that there is no sin­gle answer, and said sci­en­tists and engi­neers will need to work togeth­er with local com­mu­ni­ties, tak­ing into account the specifics of every crit­i­cal loca­tion, to deter­mine what types of solu­tions will be needed. 

“That is what our capa­bil­i­ties-based assess­ments will be tasked to fig­ure out,” he said. 

When asked whether naval bases were pre­pared for stronger and more intense hur­ri­canes, Tit­ley said that the impact a warm­ing cli­mate may have on trop­i­cal storm devel­op­ment is con­tro­ver­sial and sub­ject to much research. He explained that ocean warm­ing is only one com­po­nent of hur­ri­cane for­ma­tion, and that oth­er fac­tors such as upper lev­el wind shear may not sup­port increased fre­quen­cy and intensity. 

“What I can tell you,” he said, “is that our region­al com­man­ders make sure their bases are pre­pared for severe hur­ri­canes every year.” 

Tit­ley said it’s essen­tial to improve pre­dic­tive capa­bil­i­ties on a vari­ety of time lines to pro­vide reli­able fore­casts to deci­sion mak­ers. These pre­dic­tions need to include weath­er and ocean fore­casts in the near term, as well as cli­ma­to­log­i­cal fore­casts extend­ing decades out, he added. 

“In the past, many fed­er­al agen­cies tend­ed to pro­duce their own pre­dic­tive mod­els,” Tit­ley said. He not­ed that he is engag­ing the lead­er­ship of oth­er agen­cies to cre­ate part­ner­ships that will ensure that the best minds in the nation are work­ing col­lec­tive­ly on solu­tions. These joint cli­mate mod­els could serve both mil­i­tary and civil­ian pur­pos­es, he said, rec­og­niz­ing that details regard­ing clas­si­fi­ca­tion and secu­ri­ty would need to be worked out. 

“I believe that the time is right, and the lead­er­ship in many agen­cies is right, to work this at a nation­al lev­el,” he said, “to make sure the tax­pay­er mon­ey we put into these pre­dic­tions give the absolute best return on our col­lec­tive invest­ment. We owe this to the Amer­i­can people.” 

Tit­ley said inter­na­tion­al part­ner­ships also are impor­tant to deal­ing effec­tive­ly with poten­tial cli­mate-change chal­lenges, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the Arc­tic. He men­tioned that the Cana­di­an navy had invit­ed the Unit­ed States to par­tic­i­pate this year in its annu­al Oper­a­tion Nanook polar exer­cise. U.S. par­tic­i­pants will include a destroy­er, a mar­itime patrol air­craft, and spe­cial­ized ice div­ing units. 

“This is a tremen­dous oppor­tu­ni­ty for sev­er­al hun­dred of our sailors and offi­cers to expe­ri­ence oper­at­ing ships and air­craft well north of the Arc­tic Cir­cle,” Tit­ley said. 

There is also a pro­pos­al to share lessons learned with the Dan­ish navy, which has sig­nif­i­cant expe­ri­ence oper­at­ing in the Arc­tic waters around its ter­ri­to­ry Green­land. In addi­tion, Tit­ley said, the Naval Research Lab­o­ra­to­ry is work­ing with the Russ­ian navy in the Kara Sea this sum­mer, and there are cur­rent dis­cus­sions with the Inter­na­tion­al Hydro­graph­ic Orga­ni­za­tion to deter­mine how to best work with region­al part­ners in coop­er­a­tive ocean-sur­vey­ing operations. 

“This is not meant to be all inclu­sive,” Tit­ley said, “but it is an indi­ca­tion of progress in just the last cou­ple of months towards oppor­tu­ni­ties to work with our inter­na­tion­al partners.” 

Tit­ley not­ed some oth­er exam­ples of progress in con­sid­er­ing the strate­gic impact of cli­mate change. 

“Recent­ly, the chief of naval oper­a­tions signed out the Navy’s Arc­tic strate­gic objec­tives,” he said, “and this gives every­body in the Navy a com­mon frame of ref­er­ence to under­stand what we are try­ing to achieve.” 

He added that the Navy wants to ensure a “safe, sta­ble, and secure Arctic.” 

Tit­ley said the main goal of Task Force Cli­mate Change is to ensure the Navy is not tak­en by strate­gic sur­prise, and he expressed sat­is­fac­tion that cli­mate change is being con­sid­ered in strate­gic war games and lim­it­ed objec­tive exper­i­ments. He described these as “think­ing exer­cis­es” that exam­ine var­i­ous strate­gic sce­nar­ios to deter­mine how to han­dle them, to eval­u­ate whether the assets are avail­able to han­dle them, and to iden­ti­fy shortfalls. 

“Nobody knows what the future will entail,” Tit­ley said, “but if you run a range of sce­nar­ios, and you see that there are com­mon capa­bil­i­ties and capac­i­ties that you would need to answer those sce­nar­ios, then you can real­ly inform a future bud­get debate.” 

Source:
Office of the Oceanog­ra­ph­er of the Navy
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →