USA — Lynn Notes Cyber Command’s Significance

WASHINGTON — Deputy Defense Sec­re­tary William J. Lynn III called the estab­lish­ment of U.S. Cyber Com­mand at Fort Meade, Md., today a mile­stone in the Unit­ed States being able to con­duct full-spec­trum oper­a­tions in a new domain.

Lynn spoke to reporters in his office before attend­ing the stand-up of the com­mand. Dur­ing the cer­e­mo­ny, Army Gen. Kei­th Alexan­der, Cyber Command’s top offi­cer, pinned on his fourth star and uncased the col­ors of the new com­mand.

The com­mand is the lat­est in a series of steps that will bet­ter pro­tect mil­i­tary net­works, Lynn said, as it com­bines a con­fed­er­a­tion of task forces into a for­mal sub-uni­fied com­mand.

Cyber Com­mand will report to U.S. Strate­gic Com­mand based at Offutt Air Force Base, Neb. Lynn has led the effort to stand up the com­mand since Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates direct­ed its estab­lish­ment almost a year ago.

The new com­mand will cen­tral­ize cyber­space oper­a­tions. The cyber domain, Lynn said, is as impor­tant as the land, sea, air and space domains to the U.S. mil­i­tary, and pro­tect­ing mil­i­tary net­works is cru­cial to the Defense Department’s suc­cess on the bat­tle­field.

The U.S. mil­i­tary is more depen­dent than any oth­er mil­i­tary on infor­ma­tion tech­nol­o­gy, and that is a major rea­son why the U.S. mil­i­tary is the best in the world, Lynn said. The mil­i­tary must be able to pro­tect its com­put­er net­works and must ensure free­dom of move­ment in the domain to be able to oper­ate on net­works around the world, he added.

“We want to be able to main­tain those advan­tages and pro­tect the mil­i­tary mis­sions, and that is the main mis­sion of Cyber Com­mand – it is to pro­tect the mil­i­tary net­works,” the deputy sec­re­tary said. “It will have a role, though, in pro­tect­ing the government’s net­works and crit­i­cal infra­struc­ture.”

Cyber Com­mand draws exist­ing cyber capa­bil­i­ties and places them under one orga­ni­za­tion­al struc­ture, Lynn said. And with a four-star gen­er­al in com­mand, he not­ed, Cyber Com­mand can deal with the com­bat­ant com­mands on an equal basis.

“It will be the place where the Depart­ment of Home­land Secu­ri­ty will come to on cyber­se­cu­ri­ty mat­ters,” Lynn said. “And it will help ratio­nal­ize the inter­a­gency process.”

About 1,000 peo­ple will work at Cyber Com­mand at Fort Meade, most shift­ing over from exist­ing task forces. The ser­vices will pro­vide their cyber orga­ni­za­tions: Army Forces Cyber Com­mand, the 24th Air Force, the 10th Fleet and Marine Forces Cyber Com­mand.

How the com­mand will imple­ment poli­cies remains to be seen, Lynn said, because cyber capa­bil­i­ties have out­paced pol­i­cy. How­ev­er, “sub­stan­tial progress” has been made in cer­tain areas, he said.

Today marks the command’s attain­ment of ini­tial oper­a­tions capa­bil­i­ty. Full capa­bil­i­ty is set for Oct. 1. “That did­n’t hap­pen in iso­la­tion – we’ve been train­ing peo­ple up, we’ve had task forces, we’ve made invest­ments – this is sort of a cap­ping step,” Lynn said.

The Defense Depart­ment has made sub­stan­tial progress in work­ing with defense indus­tries, Lynn said. Offi­cials want­ed to share con­cerns about the cyber threat and best prac­tices, but there were legit­i­mate con­cerns about pro­tect­ing pro­pri­etary infor­ma­tion.

“I think we’ve worked through a lot of that,” Lynn said. “We’ve been able to work with the indus­try and share infor­ma­tion about the threats and show them what we think is com­ing at them. I think we will be able to build fur­ther on that.”

The depart­ment also has made progress inter­na­tion­al­ly. Lynn trav­eled to Great Britain and Aus­tralia to begin that process, and will trav­el to Cana­da to con­tin­ue the out­reach. This entails shared warn­ing and shared tech­nolo­gies, and Cyber Com­mand will be part of the out­reach, he said.

Lynn acknowl­edged that more progress is need­ed on the many legal issues relat­ed to cyber­se­cu­ri­ty. A U.S. inter­a­gency team is look­ing at the laws of war and the appli­ca­tion to the cyber domain. What is an attack in the cyber world? How does a nation respond to an attack? What does sov­er­eign­ty mean in regard to the Inter­net?

“We’re in the midst of a series of meet­ings the White House is lead­ing to work through a lot of those legal issues,” Lynn said. “We’ve made progress orga­ni­za­tion­al­ly, indus­tri­al­ly and inter­na­tion­al­ly, but the legal regime in par­tic­u­lar is an area we need to tack­le fur­ther.”

And the threat con­tin­ues to grow, he said.

“The first thing you say about this threat is that it’s asym­met­ric,” Lynn said. “It does­n’t take the resources of a nation state to launch cyber war. Nations still have the best capa­bil­i­ties, but you can do very threat­en­ing and dam­ag­ing things with mod­est invest­ments.

“Our abil­i­ty to pre­dict where the threats are com­ing [from], even in con­ven­tion­al threats, is remark­ably poor,” he con­tin­ued. “We did­n’t see Desert Storm com­ing. We did­n’t see the series of events that led to Afghanistan. Fore­see­ing the threats in cyber­space is hard­er. With Cyber Com­mand, I think we need to be pre­pared for the unex­pect­ed.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →