USA — Lynn Details Approach to Changes in Warfare

LOS ANGELES, April 28, 2010 — War­fare has changed, and the U.S. mil­i­tary must shift to meet the new threats, Deputy Defense Sec­re­tary William J. Lynn III said to the World Affairs Coun­cil here last night.

Deputy Defense Secretary William J. Lynn III
Deputy Defense Sec­re­tary William J. Lynn III explains the Defense Department’s adap­ta­tion to changes in war­fare to mem­bers of the Los Ange­les World Affairs Coun­cil, April 27, 2010.
Bildquelle: DoD pho­to by Air Force Mas­ter Sgt. Jer­ry Mor­ri­son
(Click to enlarge)

Lynn said he and Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates have tried to shift mil­i­tary strat­e­gy “to move the tec­ton­ic plates of our nation­al secu­ri­ty envi­ron­ment.”

The Defense Depart­ment is doing more to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan while still prepar­ing for future con­flicts, Lynn said. Past strat­e­gy, he told the group, did not pay enough atten­tion to cur­rent con­flicts, and the depart­ment has changed the bal­ance toward fight­ing today’s wars.

The biggest change in war is that rogue nations, ter­ror groups and even crim­i­nal gangs can field increas­ing­ly lethal tech­nolo­gies, the deputy sec­re­tary told the audi­ence.

“Ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tions and rogue states seek weapons of mass destruc­tion, insur­gents are armed with [impro­vised explo­sive devices] that can pen­e­trate even our most sophis­ti­cat­ed armored vehi­cles,” he said. “We even see crim­i­nals who have world-class cyber capa­bil­i­ties.”

The mil­i­tary must be ready to face these chal­lenges, he said, and still main­tain the capa­bil­i­ties to take on peer com­peti­tors.

Anoth­er change is that wars, con­flicts, emer­gen­cies are longer than they used to be, Lynn said. The old strat­e­gy was based on fight­ing two major, near­ly simul­ta­ne­ous con­flicts. But plan­ners thought the wars would be like Oper­a­tion Desert Storm in 1991 – a pow­er­ful, quick war.

“But the con­cept no longer fits our cur­rent real­i­ty,” Lynn said. “We are already fight­ing two wars, and it was­n’t the inten­si­ty of the ini­tial com­bat phase that proved the most chal­leng­ing in Iraq and Afghanistan. Rather, after eight years in those two con­flicts, we are find­ing the dura­tion of those con­flicts is what places the most stress on American’s mil­i­tary. These wars have now last­ed longer than the Unit­ed States’ par­tic­i­pa­tion in World War I and World War II com­bined.”

War has moved more toward asym­met­ric threats. No nation or group can match the U.S. military’s con­ven­tion­al strength, Lynn said, so they don’t try.

“Rather than fight­ing us head-to-head, they use IEDs to counter our mech­a­nized advan­tage or gueril­la tac­tics to avoid direct com­bat,” he explained. Some coun­tries also are invest­ing in weapons such as sur­face-to-sur­face mis­siles, cyber capa­bil­i­ties and anti-satel­lite tech­nolo­gies to deny U.S. access to bat­tle­fields.

The cyber threat is anoth­er pro­found change in war­fare, Lynn told the group.

“There is no exag­ger­at­ing our nation’s depen­dence on infor­ma­tion net­works,” he said. The Defense Depart­ment alone has thou­sands of net­works, mil­lions of com­put­ers and more mil­lions of com­put­er users. All major weapons sys­tems, the intel­li­gence and logis­tics efforts and per­son­nel pro­grams rely on infor­ma­tion tech­nol­o­gy.

“The Inter­net is mag­i­cal in its abil­i­ty to con­nect us to oth­ers,” Lynn said, “but it is a two-way street. Over the past 10 years, the fre­quen­cy and sophis­ti­ca­tion of cyber intru­sions has increased expo­nen­tial­ly.” More than 100 for­eign intel­li­gence ser­vices are try­ing to hack into U.S. sys­tems, he said, and for­eign mil­i­taries are devel­op­ing offen­sive cyber capa­bil­i­ties.

Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma has called the cyber threat one of the most seri­ous chal­lenges Amer­i­ca faces, Lynn said. Cyber attacks threat­en not only the U.S. mil­i­tary, but also the Amer­i­can infra­struc­ture and econ­o­my, he added.

Lynn said the depart­ment is address­ing all of these threats. The U.S. mil­i­tary is devel­op­ing the capa­bil­i­ties to han­dle the range of con­flict from low-end insur­gen­cies to high-end near peer wars. The mil­i­tary ser­vices are adjust­ing the way they recruit, train and retain ser­vice­mem­bers in face of long wars. And the Unit­ed States is work­ing to counter asym­met­ric attacks and to con­tin­ue to enhance asym­met­ric advan­tages of its own.

The way the Defense Depart­ment buys equip­ment, pro­grams ser­vices also has to change, Lynn said, acknowl­edg­ing that the depart­ment has not been a good buy­er. Chang­ing the way the acqui­si­tion process works is an impor­tant part of fund­ing the capa­bil­i­ties to han­dle future threats, he added.

To illus­trate his point, Lynn not­ed that Apple devel­oped the iPhone in 24 months. “That’s less time than it would take for us to bud­get for an IT pro­gram,” he said. “I’m seri­ous. Just to pre­pare, defend and receive con­gres­sion­al approval for our bud­get takes about 24 months.”

Over­all, he added, it takes 81 months – near­ly sev­en years — from an IT pro­gram first being fund­ed until it becomes oper­a­tional. This means the equip­ment already is four gen­er­a­tions old by the time it gets in the hands of ser­vice­mem­bers.

Can­celling pro­grams that don’t work, are redun­dant or are too spe­cial­ized is anoth­er way to shape the bud­get, Lynn said. Gates has made the hard deci­sions, he told the group, and the pro­grams he has can­celled or rec­om­mend­ed for can­cel­la­tion would have cost $330 bil­lion if they con­tin­ued.

“By exer­cis­ing pro­gram dis­ci­pline, we are able to direct resources to the high­est pri­or­i­ty pro­grams,” Lynn said. “These tough deci­sions enhance our abil­i­ty to pro­tect the Amer­i­can peo­ple.”

The chang­ing envi­ron­ment places great stress on the mil­i­tary and the depart­ment, the deputy sec­re­tary said. “Suc­ceed­ing in these tumul­tuous times, while pre­vail­ing in Afghanistan and Iraq, will not be easy,” said he added. “But I’m con­fi­dent that we have chart­ed a path that will keep out nation safe.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →