USA — Leakers, Publishers May Have Blood on Hands, Mullen Says

WASHINGTON, July 29, 2010 — Those who leaked clas­si­fied doc­u­ments to Wik­iLeaks and those who decid­ed to pub­lish them may have blood on their hands, the chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said here today.

The Wik­iLeaks orga­ni­za­tion made pub­lic tens of thou­sands of clas­si­fied bat­tle­field reports.

Navy Adm. Mike Mullen and Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates con­demned the leak in the strongest pos­si­ble man­ner. Gates said he has asked the FBI to help Pen­ta­gon author­i­ties in the inves­ti­ga­tion.

The chair­man chal­lenged the moti­va­tion of Julian Assange, the founder of Wik­iLeaks, to pub­lish the leaked doc­u­ments.

“Mr. Assange can say what­ev­er he likes about the greater good he thinks he and his source are doing, but the truth is they might already have on their hands the blood of some young sol­dier or that of an Afghan fam­i­ly,” Mullen said.

Peo­ple can rea­son­ably dis­agree about the war and they can chal­lenge com­man­ders for their deci­sions, “but don’t put those who will­ing­ly go into harm’s way even fur­ther in harm’s way just to sat­is­fy your need to make a point,” the chair­man said.

Gates said the more than 90,000 doc­u­ments that have been post­ed are old, and cov­er mate­r­i­al already well known and debat­ed. Still, he said, the release has bat­tle­field con­se­quences for U.S. and Afghan troops and Afghan civil­ians and also may dam­age U.S. rela­tion­ships in Cen­tral Asia and the Mid­dle East.

Intel­li­gence sources and meth­ods, as well as mil­i­tary tac­tics, tech­niques and pro­ce­dures, will become known to U.S. adver­saries, the sec­re­tary said.

“These doc­u­ments rep­re­sent a moun­tain of raw data and indi­vid­ual impres­sions, most sev­er­al years old, devoid of con­text or analy­sis,” Gates said. “They do not rep­re­sent offi­cial posi­tions or pol­i­cy. And they do not, in my view, fun­da­men­tal­ly call into ques­tion the effi­ca­cy of our cur­rent strat­e­gy in Afghanistan and its prospects for suc­cess.”

Defense Depart­ment offi­cials will con­duct a thor­ough and aggres­sive inves­ti­ga­tion to deter­mine how this leak occurred, to iden­ti­fy who is respon­si­ble and to assess the con­tent of the infor­ma­tion com­pro­mised, Gates said. “We have a moral respon­si­bil­i­ty to do every­thing pos­si­ble to mit­i­gate the con­se­quences for our troops and our part­ners down­range, espe­cial­ly those who have worked with and put their trust in us in the past, who now may be tar­get­ed for ret­ri­bu­tion,” Gsaid he added.

Mullen said the sheer size and scope of the leak demands a care­ful review see how future tac­ti­cal oper­a­tions may be affect­ed, and the degree to which the lives of U.S. and coali­tion troops and Afghan part­ners may be at risk. “I think we always need to be mind­ful of the unknown poten­tial for dam­age in any par­tic­u­lar doc­u­ment that we han­dle,” the chair­man said. Call­ing on the FBI to aid the inves­ti­ga­tion ensures that the depart­ment will have all the resources need­ed to inves­ti­gate and assess this breach of nation­al secu­ri­ty, the sec­re­tary said, not­ing that use of the bureau ensures the inves­ti­ga­tion can go wher­ev­er it needs to go.

The Defense Depart­ment also is tight­en­ing pro­ce­dures for access­ing and trans­port­ing clas­si­fied infor­ma­tion.

“As a gen­er­al propo­si­tion, we endeav­or to push access to sen­si­tive bat­tle­field infor­ma­tion down to where it is most use­ful – on the front lines – where, as a prac­ti­cal mat­ter, there are few­er restric­tions and con­trols than at rear head­quar­ters,” Gates said. “In the wake of this inci­dent, it will be a real chal­lenge to strike the right bal­ance between secu­ri­ty and pro­vid­ing our front­line troops the infor­ma­tion they need.”

The doc­u­ments may also dam­age U.S. rela­tion­ships with Afghanistan and Pak­istan. Gates said both nations remem­ber that the Unit­ed States walked away from the region in 1989, and U.S. mil­i­tary and civil­ian lead­ers have been try­ing hard since 2001 to repair those rela­tion­ships and close the trust deficit.

“If we’ve learned noth­ing else in fight­ing these wars, it’s that rela­tion­ships mat­ter,” Mullen said.

These rela­tion­ships are vital, Mullen said, and some of the doc­u­ments may encour­age dis­trust. “So in addi­tion to mak­ing sure we under­stand the tac­ti­cal risks from these leaks,” he said, “I think it’s incum­bent upon us not to let the good rela­tion­ships we’ve estab­lished and the trust we’ve worked so hard to build through­out the region also become a casu­al­ty.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →