USA — Leaders Emphasize Importance of Moral Courage, Candor

WASHINGTON, Jan. 11, 2011 — Telling the boss what he or she wants to hear is easy. But what are ser­vice mem­bers to do when asked to pro­vide pro­fes­sion­al advice or a rec­om­men­da­tion, know­ing it runs con­trary to what the senior leader wants or expects?
That’s the dilem­ma two retired gen­er­als dis­cussed yes­ter­day as they shared their own expe­ri­ences at a mil­i­tary pro­fes­sion­al­ism con­fer­ence orga­nized at the request of Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates has said he counts can­dor and moral courage among the essen­tial qual­i­ties for 21st-cen­tu­ry mil­i­tary lead­ers. Speak­ing last spring at the U.S. Naval Acad­e­my in Annapo­lis, Md., he cit­ed sev­er­al Naval Acad­e­my grad­u­ates who rose to great­ness large­ly because they rec­og­nized the need to some­times buck insti­tu­tion­al resis­tance.

“One of the key rea­sons they were suc­cess­ful was because they were will­ing to speak truth to pow­er — will­ing to tell supe­ri­ors what they need­ed to hear, not what they want­ed to hear,” Gates told the mid­ship­men.

Mullen, speak­ing last spring at the U.S. Air Force Acad­e­my grad­u­a­tion and com­mis­sion­ing in Col­orado Springs, Colo., chal­lenged the new offi­cers to be lead­ers demon­strat­ing loy­al­ty, integri­ty and imag­i­na­tion as they live up to their com­mis­sion­ing oath. But he warned them that their loy­al­ty should nev­er be blind.

“Few things are more impor­tant to an orga­ni­za­tion than peo­ple who have the moral courage to ques­tion the direc­tion in which the orga­ni­za­tion is head­ed, and then the strength of char­ac­ter to sup­port what­ev­er final deci­sions are made,” the chair­man told the cadets.

Speak­ing at the Nation­al Defense University’s con­fer­ence on “Intro­spec­tion and Reflec­tion on Basic Tenets and the Way Ahead” yes­ter­day, retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Jack L. Rives and retired Army Lt. Gen. Julius W. Bec­ton, Jr., shared their own expe­ri­ences of what it’s like to offer guid­ance that does­n’t nec­es­sar­i­ly track with what the high­er-ups want.

Rives, the Air Force’s judge advo­cate gen­er­al after the 9/11 ter­ror attacks, played a piv­otal role in a broad range of legal delib­er­a­tions and activ­i­ties regard­ing the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, includ­ing detainee oper­a­tions.

Retired Army Lt. Gen. Julius W. Bec­ton, Jr., who rose through the ranks from a pri­vate serv­ing in a seg­re­gat­ed Army dur­ing World War II to com­man­der of VII Corps dur­ing the Cold War, helped pave the way to ful­ly inte­grate women into the mil­i­tary.

Both found them­selves nego­ti­at­ing dif­fi­cult waters and some­times buck­ing the estab­lish­ment along the way.

Rives kicked off yesterday’s pan­el dis­cus­sion by recit­ing the oath every offi­cer takes when receiv­ing a mil­i­tary com­mis­sion. “That is real­ly all the guid­ance you need,” he told the atten­dees, key lead­ers of the mil­i­tary edu­ca­tion and train­ing com­mu­ni­ty. Paus­ing, he added with a smile, “Of course, the dev­il is in the details.”

Mil­i­tary mem­bers have a respon­si­bil­i­ty to remain apo­lit­i­cal even when report­ing to polit­i­cal fig­ures, Rives said, reit­er­at­ing a key point made ear­li­er in the day by Mullen as well as retired Air Force Gen. Richard B. Myers, for­mer Joint Chiefs of Staff chair­man.

“It’s impor­tant to real­ize that your oath is to [pro­tect and defend] the Con­sti­tu­tion,” Rives said. “It is not to a polit­i­cal par­ty. It is not to an admin­is­tra­tion. It is not to a person…We owe our alle­giance and loy­al­ty to the coun­try and its Con­sti­tu­tion.”

When tes­ti­fy­ing before Con­gress, Rives said he knew he was bound by a promise to pro­vide his best mil­i­tary guid­ance and when asked, his per­son­al opin­ion, even when it did­n’t jive with the administration’s posi­tion.

“You have to live with your­self. You look at your­self in the mir­ror each day,” he said. “So you should­n’t be moti­vat­ed by, ‘What is this going to do for or to my career if I give my boss cer­tain advice. Your oblig­a­tion is to give the best advice pos­si­ble.”

When he shares that con­vic­tion with younger offi­cers and advis­es them to do what they believe is right, Rives said they some­times balk. “They say, ‘It’s easy for you to say, you’re a three-star gen­er­al,’ ” he told the group. “I thought about it and said, ‘Real­ly, it’s easy for you to do as well, because you have to live with your­self. You look at your­self in the mir­ror each day. And you should­n’t be moti­vat­ed by, ‘What is this going to do for or to my career?’ ”

Rives said he knew dur­ing his career he’d giv­en his com­man­ders advice they did­n’t like hear­ing. “But in almost every case, lat­er they showed some appre­ci­a­tion for me telling them what I believed was my best advice,” he said. “So, ‘To thine own self be true’ is what I have to say.”

Bec­ton echoed Rives’ con­vic­tion as he shared 12 basic prin­ci­ples that for­mu­lat­ed his phi­los­o­phy of com­mand. Among them: Integri­ty is non-nego­tiable. Chal­lenge asser­tions. And dis­agree­ment is not dis­re­spect.

These proved invalu­able as he chart­ed the course in help­ing the Army move beyond iso­lat­ed bil­lets for the women who were just begin­ning to enter the mil­i­tary ranks and poli­cies that sound­ed good on paper but sim­ply did­n’t apply in real life.

“A good approach is, ‘How do you feel look­ing at the per­son in the mir­ror in the morn­ing when you have made a deci­sion?’ ” Bec­ton said. “If you can live with that, I say, fine. If that caus­es you a prob­lem, maybe you ought to go back and take anoth­er look.”

Asked dur­ing a ques­tion-and-answer peri­od about the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law that had pro­hib­it­ed gays and les­bians from serv­ing open­ly in the mil­i­tary, Rives offered a response as direct and unvar­nished as those he had chal­lenged the audi­ence to present their lead­ers.

A law is a law and mil­i­tary mem­bers must obey it, he said, regard­less of their per­son­al feel­ings about it.

“If it is a legal require­ment, they have no choice but to com­ply,” he said. “If you have a mem­ber of the mil­i­tary who feels strong­ly that they can­not serve in the mil­i­tary because the mil­i­tary will per­mit some­one who is a declared homo­sex­u­al to serve open­ly, then their deci­sion will [have] to be to leave the mil­i­tary.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →