USA — Joint Chiefs Vice Chairman Recommends ‘Don’t Ask’ Repeal

WASHINGTON, Dec. 3, 2010 — Amer­i­can ser­vice­mem­bers “think in terms of mis­sion accom­plish­ment and look beyond issues of race, reli­gion, gen­der and, frankly, sex­u­al ori­en­ta­tion,” the nation’s No. 2 mil­i­tary offi­cer told Con­gress today.
Marine Corps Gen. James E. Cartwright, vice chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the ser­vice chiefs tes­ti­fied dur­ing the sec­ond day of Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee hear­ings fol­low­ing the release of the Defense Department’s report on the impact of pos­si­ble repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law.

“It is hard to fore­see a time when the men and women of the U.S. mil­i­tary will be more focused and dis­ci­plined than they are today,” Cartwright said. “We must be pru­dent in our approach, but there is lit­tle to sug­gest that the issues asso­ci­at­ed with a change in the law and DOD pol­i­cy will dimin­ish if we wait on the uncer­tain promise of a less chal­leng­ing future.” 

Cartwright said while com­bat troops’ antic­i­pa­tion of neg­a­tive impacts on unit cohe­sion in the event of repeal is a con­cern, actu­al expe­ri­ence indi­cates such dis­rup­tion would be minimal. 

“While the per­cent­age of ‘pre­dic­tive’ neg­a­tive effects was high­er with­in the com­bat arms com­mu­ni­ties, it is impor­tant to note that the num­bers in the report shift dra­mat­i­cal­ly to the very pos­i­tive when this same com­bat arms sub­group was asked about their actu­al expe­ri­ences when serv­ing in a unit with some­one believed to be homo­sex­u­al,” he said. “In terms of actu­al dis­rup­tion expe­ri­enced, as opposed to pre­dict­ed dis­rup­tion, the dis­tinc­tion between com­bat arms com­mu­ni­ties and the force as a whole is negligible.” 

Cartwright said imple­ment­ing a repeal of the law that bans gays from serv­ing open­ly in the mil­i­tary will be chal­leng­ing, adding that man­ag­ing such a sys­temic change may best be done while the coun­try is at war. 

“Dif­fi­cult tasks are rarely well served by delay. It is hard to fore­see a time when the men and women of the U.S. mil­i­tary will be more focused and dis­ci­plined than they are today,” he said. 

In times of con­flict, the forces’ focus is on the war effort, the gen­er­al said. 

“The chal­lenges asso­ci­at­ed with mak­ing a change of any kind that seems enor­mous dur­ing peri­ods of inac­tiv­i­ty become less dis­tract­ing when you are defend­ing your nation and com­rades,” Cartwright said. “The char­ac­ter of the indi­vid­ual becomes the focal point, not pre­sumed or known atti­tudes or lifestyles.” 

The find­ings of the report, he said, seem to con­firm this view. 

The vice chair­man echoed yesterday’s tes­ti­mo­ny by Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates and Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in express­ing con­cern over the pos­si­bil­i­ty that a court could strike down the law. 

“In some respects, the risk we will encounter should the law and pol­i­cy change will be dri­ven by how the law and pol­i­cy is changed,” he said. “Repeal­ing the exist­ing law by an act of Con­gress will enhance the department’s abil­i­ty to man­age risk.” If the law is rescind­ed through the judi­cial process, he added, the department’s abil­i­ty to man­age the risk of imple­men­ta­tion is made more difficult. 

Cartwright also said the mil­i­tary ser­vices’ strength lies, in part, in how they reflect the nation’s diver­si­ty and its abil­i­ty to unite under the rule of law to pur­sue nation­al interests. 

“The char­ac­ter and appeal of the U.S. armed forces lies in the inclu­siv­i­ty, equal­i­ty and oppor­tu­ni­ty res­i­dent in our orga­ni­za­tion­al ethos,” Cartwright said. “Being more inclu­sive, in my view, will improve the insti­tu­tion as a whole.” 

Cartwright also stressed the impor­tance of mil­i­tary lead­er­ship in lead­ing a pos­si­ble change in law affect­ing the forces. 

“It is a cer­tain­ty that change brings chal­lenge, but chal­lenges demand lead­er­ship,” he said. “My faith in our lead­er­ship, … the fair-mind­ed tem­pera­ment of the Amer­i­can pub­lic, and the rep­u­ta­tion­al ben­e­fit derived from being a force iden­ti­fied by hon­esty and inclu­siv­i­ty, rather than con­ceal­ment, caus­es me to favor repeal of [the law] and revo­ca­tion of the asso­ci­at­ed DOD pol­i­cy known as ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.’ ” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twitter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →