USA — General Outlines U.S. Mission, Challenges in Africa

WASHINGTON, July 20, 2010 — As U.S. Africa Com­mand matures and strength­ens ties with African nations, Amer­i­can inter­ests on the con­ti­nent become more sta­ble, the command’s top offi­cer said today.

Africom was estab­lished in Octo­ber 2007 to “add val­ue” to African nations by improv­ing their mil­i­tary capac­i­ties and to help nations achieve their short- and long-term goals, Army Gen. William E. “Kip” Ward said dur­ing remarks at the Cen­ter for Strate­gic and Inter­na­tion­al Stud­ies here. He dis­cussed progress and chal­lenges and explained the strate­gic impor­tance of the con­ti­nent to glob­al secu­ri­ty.

Many African nations strug­gle with demo­c­ra­t­ic process­es, polit­i­cal reform, civ­il con­flict and recon­struc­tion issues, Ward not­ed. Despite those chal­lenges, Africa presents tremen­dous oppor­tu­ni­ty, he said.

Much of the continent’s devel­op­ment progress is hin­dered by cor­rup­tion, weak gov­er­nance and drug and human traf­fick­ing, Ward explained. Also, the grow­ing pop­u­la­tion faces chal­lenges in food and secu­ri­ty. How­ev­er, those con­cerns are “not absolute bar­ri­ers,” he said.

Good gov­er­nance and reli­able mil­i­taries prove to counter such con­cerns, Ward said. Sev­er­al nations have become well-respect­ed, inter­na­tion­al part­ners ded­i­cat­ed to peace­keep­ing, he added.

“Good gov­er­nance … fos­ters change in sta­bil­i­ty that allows the U.S. and Africa, across all spec­trums to build trust [and] pur­sue mutu­al inter­ests toward last­ing rela­tion­ships,” Ward said. “Africans are steadi­ly tak­ing own­er­ship in address­ing exist­ing secu­ri­ty chal­lenges. It means that, over time, we can work more effec­tive­ly togeth­er to fur­ther these mutu­al inter­ests.”

African nations have the poten­tial to be great, long-term secu­ri­ty part­ners, the gen­er­al said. But some are more depen­dent on out­side resources, he added.

“The greater issue is not that chal­lenges exist in Africa,” he said. “Africans lack the means to whol­ly and ful­ly con­front them.”

In some cas­es, Ward explained, resources are avail­able with­in African nations, but are not aligned to address the chal­lenges. Also, some­times oppor­tu­ni­ties for progress are not well under­stood, he said, adding that devel­op­ing a sta­ble econ­o­my and gov­ern­ment need as much focus as secu­ri­ty.

“I get asked all the time: What are you going to do about Soma­lia? What are you going to do about Sudan? What are you going to do about the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Repub­lic of the Con­go? What are you going to do about Liberia?” the gen­er­al said.

“It’s also impor­tant to look at Africa in terms of the oppor­tu­ni­ty that exists,” Ward said. “Eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment, gov­er­nance, secu­ri­ty ini­tia­tives and the continent’s geopo­lit­i­cal role will both improve the lives of Africans and build a foun­da­tion for a stronger, longer friend­ship [and] coop­er­a­tion between the nations of Africa and the Unit­ed States, all the while pro­mot­ing an envi­ron­ment where Amer­i­can lives are more secure.”

Such effects will be felt abroad and in the Unit­ed States, any­where Amer­i­can inter­ests are pro­mot­ed, Ward said. The strate­gic impor­tance of Africa is about sta­bil­i­ty and growth, which is in the best inter­est of the Unit­ed States, he added.

“Since the command’s incep­tion, we rou­tine­ly heard phras­es like, ‘African solu­tions to African prob­lems,’ ” he said. “While that theme still res­onates, U.S. efforts to help Africans address their chal­lenges focus … on a com­bi­na­tion of diplo­mat­ic, devel­op­men­tal and defense engage­ment – pro­grams that help build capac­i­ty, that fos­ter African own­er­ship.”

The com­mand, he said, prides itself on the abil­i­ty to “lis­ten and learn” from African nations.

“We had to get out of our fox­holes, go down range and look back at what we were doing from the per­spec­tive of our most-impor­tant part­ners – the Africans,” Ward said. “After hun­dreds of engage­ments with African polit­i­cal and mil­i­tary lead­ers, as well as mem­bers of civ­il soci­ety, there were sev­er­al com­mon themes of what the Africans want­ed in terms of their long-term secu­ri­ty inter­ests.”

Africom is pri­mar­i­ly con­cerned with build­ing mil­i­tary forces, the gen­er­al said, acknowl­edg­ing the impor­tance of ground, sea and air mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties. How­ev­er, he added, broad­er capa­bil­i­ties also are need­ed.

“Police, bor­der patrols, coast guard, cus­toms, immi­gra­tion, air/space man­age­ment, courts, law; all these are lined against the chal­lenges and threats the part­ner nations face,” Ward said. “Suf­fi­cient free­dom from polit­i­cal vio­lence is need­ed to allow real progress to take root.”

Con­di­tions must be set for Africans to address short-term chal­lenges, so long-term objec­tives can be pur­sued, he said.

“This is clear­ly a long-term endeav­or,” Ward said. “Devel­op­ment or trans­for­ma­tion of secu­ri­ty capac­i­ty does not hap­pen overnight, and in many cas­es will hap­pen on an African, not an Amer­i­can, timetable.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →