USA — Gates, Mullen Comment on McChrystal Situation

WASHINGTON, June 24, 2010 — Judg­ment and civil­ian con­trol of the mil­i­tary were at the heart of Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s deci­sion to accept Army Gen. Stan­ley A. McChrystal’s res­ig­na­tion as the NATO and U.S. com­man­der in Afghanistan, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates said today.

Gates and Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, the chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, both said they “ful­ly sup­port” Obama’s deci­sion and his nom­i­na­tion of Army Gen. David H. Petraeus to replace McChrystal. 

“Like the pres­i­dent, I deeply regret the cir­cum­stances that made this deci­sion nec­es­sary,” Gates said dur­ing a Pen­ta­gon news con­fer­ence. “Gen­er­al McChrys­tal is one of the finest offi­cers and war­riors of his gen­er­a­tion, who has an extra­or­di­nary record in lead­ing the fight against some of this country’s most lethal ene­mies in Iraq and Afghanistan.” 

Gates and Mullen said McChrys­tal showed poor judg­ment with regard to the Rolling Stone pro­file in which he and mem­bers of his staff were crit­i­cal of admin­is­tra­tion offi­cials. The sit­u­a­tion “has made his con­tin­ued ser­vice in that post and as a mem­ber of the nation­al secu­ri­ty team unten­able,” Gates said. “The state­ments and atti­tudes report­ed in the news media are unac­cept­able under our form of gov­ern­ment, and are incon­sis­tent with the high stan­dards expect­ed of mil­i­tary leaders.” 

The chair­man said he was stunned when he read the Rolling Stone profile. 

“I can­not excuse his lack of judg­ment with respect to the Rolling Stone arti­cle or a com­mand cli­mate he evi­dent­ly per­mit­ted that was at best dis­re­spect­ful of civil­ian author­i­ty,” Mullen said. “We do not have that lux­u­ry, those of us in uni­form. We do not have the right, nor should we ever assume the pre­rog­a­tive, to cast doubt upon the abil­i­ty or mock the motives of our civil­ian lead­ers, elect­ed or appointed.” 

Mil­i­tary per­son­nel are and must remain a neu­tral instru­ment of the gov­ern­ment, he said. Ser­vice­mem­bers must be account­able to and respect­ful of civil­ian lead­ers “no mat­ter which par­ty holds sway or which per­son holds a giv­en office,” Mullen said. 

Mil­i­tary lead­ers must step down when they lose the trust and con­fi­dence of civil­ian lead­ers, the chair­man said. 

“The job we are called upon to do for the nation is too impor­tant, the lives we are sworn to pro­tect too pre­cious, to per­mit any doubt or uncer­tain­ty in that regard,” he said. “Gen­er­al McChrys­tal did the right thing by offer­ing to resign.” 

Both men stressed that while the lead­er­ship is chang­ing, the strat­e­gy in Afghanistan is not. “Our troops and coali­tion part­ners are mak­ing extra­or­di­nary sac­ri­fices in the fight against al-Qai­da and its extrem­ist allies,” Gates said. “Our sin­gu­lar focus must be on suc­ceed­ing in this mis­sion with­out dis­trac­tion or division.” 

Gates said that he was con­cerned that the effort in Afghanistan would lose time and focus if a new com­man­der came in with­out knowl­edge of the situation. 

One con­cern that the sec­re­tary had was to min­i­mize any impact a change would have on the con­duct of the war in Afghanistan. “I will tell you that … it was the pres­i­dent who first raised Petraeus’ name,” Gates said. “And it imme­di­ate­ly, to me, answered a lot of the con­cerns that I had.” 

As the U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand chief, Petraeus has been part of the dis­cus­sions on the Afghan strat­e­gy all along. The gen­er­al was in charge of U.S. mil­i­tary oper­a­tions in Iraq dur­ing the troop surge there, and mil­i­tary and civil­ian efforts there have paid off. 

“The key [in Afghanistan] was that we not lose our focus and be fur­ther dis­tract­ed for a peri­od of months,” Gates said. “And that’s why the selec­tion of Gen­er­al Petraeus was so impor­tant, in my view. Now the pres­i­dent has estab­lished the strat­e­gy, but from my per­spec­tive, Gen­er­al Petraeus will have the flex­i­bil­i­ty to look at the cam­paign plan and the approach and all man­ner of things when he gets to Afghanistan, assum­ing Sen­ate confirmation.” 

The Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee has sched­uled Petraeus’ con­fir­ma­tion hear­ings for June 29, and com­mit­tee offi­cials promised an ear­ly vote on the mat­ter. NATO still must act to appoint the gen­er­al as the com­man­der of the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force. 

“No one – be they adver­saries or friends, or espe­cial­ly our troops – should mis­in­ter­pret these per­son­nel changes as a slack­en­ing of this government’s com­mit­ment to the mis­sion in Afghanistan,” Gates said. “We remain com­mit­ted to that mis­sion and to the com­pre­hen­sive civ­il-mil­i­tary strat­e­gy ordered by the pres­i­dent to achieve our goals there.” 

Both Gates and Mullen praised McChrystal’s service. 

“Gen­er­al McChrys­tal and many of his imme­di­ate staff have served and pro­tect­ed this coun­try in com­bat with great courage, val­or, skill and devo­tion for many years,” Gates said. 

Their out­stand­ing record of ser­vice remains intact for pos­ter­i­ty, and is deserv­ing of our last­ing recog­ni­tion and pro­found gratitude.” 

Mullen said McChrys­tal is a friend with whom he worked when the gen­er­al served as the direc­tor of the Joint Staff for a year. 

“He’s a fine sol­dier and a good man,” Mullen said of McChrys­tal. “He has served his coun­try nobly and with great dis­tinc­tion for more than three decades, much of that last decade at war. He led men in places the rest of us could not fol­low, and he fought men in ways the rest of us could not fathom. 

“I was proud one year ago to sup­port him for the Afghanistan com­mand,” the admi­ral con­tin­ued. “And I think it’s worth not­ing his strong lead­er­ship and the foun­da­tion he has laid for future suc­cess there.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →