USA — Director Calls Personnel System Transition ‘Rewarding’

WASHINGTON, Jan. 13, 2011 — The Defense Department’s trans­fer of more than 170,000 civil­ian employ­ees out of the Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Per­son­nel Sys­tem since 2009 has been smooth, the transition’s direc­tor said today.

John H. James Jr. said much of the cred­it for the tran­si­tion goes to the services. 

“The com­po­nents have done a very good job,” he said, adding that his office had reviewed and approved the tran­si­tion plan each of the ser­vices submitted. 

“Our guid­ance in the begin­ning was that we would have the least pos­si­ble impact to employ­ees and the least pos­si­ble impact to mis­sion,” he said. “The com­po­nents have accom­plished that.” 

Most of the employ­ees moved out of NSPS so far have returned to the gen­er­al sched­ule pay sys­tem, James said. Those remain­ing in NSPS will pre­dom­i­nant­ly return to oth­er per­for­mance man­age­ment systems. 

When employ­ees trans­ferred to NSPS orig­i­nal­ly, most of the oth­er per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tems were effec­tive­ly dis­man­tled, James said. When employ­ees lat­er were required to move back into the pre­vi­ous sys­tems when Con­gress abol­ished NSPS, “we need­ed a lit­tle bit more time to put those back in place,” he said. 

The Acqui­si­tion Demon­stra­tion Project and the Sci­ence Tech­nol­o­gy Rein­ven­tion Lab­o­ra­to­ry Demon­stra­tion Project are two such sys­tems, James said, and most of the remain­ing NSPS defense employ­ees will return to one or the other. 

“There are oth­er, small­er per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tems that employ­ees will be tran­si­tion­ing to, but those are the two big ones,” he said. 

The law gov­ern­ing NSPS tran­si­tion specif­i­cal­ly states employ­ees must return to the sys­tem they came from, he said. 

Con­gress estab­lished NSPS through the 2004 Nation­al Defense Autho­riza­tion Act and direct­ed its repeal in the 2010 Nation­al Defense Autho­riza­tion Act, which also set the time­line for repeal completion. 

“We start­ed with approx­i­mate­ly 226,000 employ­ees in the NSPS per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tem,” James said. “We have tran­si­tioned approx­i­mate­ly 172,000 –- right around 75 per­cent -– of the employ­ees out of NSPS, which was the direc­tion [for 2010] that we got from the deputy sec­re­tary of defense.” 

Dur­ing the move from NSPS back to pre­vi­ous posi­tions, each employee’s job had to be reclas­si­fied, James said. Major changes in duties and respon­si­bil­i­ties for any par­tic­u­lar posi­tion could be reviewed by the ser­vic­ing human resources office dur­ing reclassification. 

“And that has, in fact, occurred,” he said. “There are some cas­es where an employ­ee is not hap­py with their clas­si­fi­ca­tion, and we pub­lished on our web­site the process they had to go through to appeal a clas­si­fi­ca­tion concern.” 

Com­mu­ni­ca­tion with the work force dur­ing the entire process has helped to ensure a smooth tran­si­tion, the direc­tor said. 

“We’ve been work­ing very hard to make sure we keep every­one informed,” he said. “As we make every step, we com­mu­ni­cate to the work force: ‘this is our progress toward tran­si­tion, this is when your group will tran­si­tion, and this is the process we’re going to go through.’ ” 

Some employ­ees, such as those who were first hired under NSPS, had nev­er worked under the gen­er­al sched­ule sys­tem, James said. 

“We put ‘GS 101,’ a course, on our web­site,” James said. “We rec­om­mend­ed that employ­ees who had nev­er been on the gen­er­al sched­ule, and employ­ees who had been in the gen­er­al sched­ule sys­tem, go review it. It was very infor­ma­tive, an easy read and eas­i­ly understandable.” 

James said the course was designed to empha­size to employ­ees that while NSPS was a broad-pay-band sys­tem, the gen­er­al sched­ule sys­tem has “dis­crete grades with very dis­crete [pay] steps.” 

“There is a dif­fer­ence between them -– there’s not a clean over­lay between the two sys­tems,” he said. 

Some employ­ees were con­cerned that chang­ing sys­tems would mean a cut in pay or posi­tion, James said, but the law ensured no employ­ee would face a pay decrease dur­ing the transition. 

“The com­po­nents made this a pri­or­i­ty,” he said. “They were very con­cerned about send­ing the prop­er mes­sage to the work force, that … they want­ed to make sure the tran­si­tion was smooth, that we met the mis­sion, and that there was min­i­mal impact to the employ­ees. The com­po­nents were on top of this the whole time.” 

James said 54,000 employ­ees remain in NSPS, and about 6,000 of those will return to the gen­er­al sched­ule system. 

“We will con­tin­ue to focus our atten­tion on tran­si­tion­ing the remain­ing employ­ees,” James said. “We will meet the statu­to­ry date of Jan. 1, 2012, where all employ­ees will be tran­si­tioned out of NSPS.” 

James said his work over the past year has been “a fas­ci­nat­ing experience.” 

“We will have tran­si­tioned 228,000 employ­ees out of NSPS to statu­to­ry non-NSPS per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tems,” he said. “That’s more employ­ees than are con­tained in any fed­er­al agency oth­er than the Depart­ment of Vet­er­ans Affairs.” 

“Talk­ing to the com­po­nents and my staff and see­ing the ded­i­ca­tion it takes to do this has been very reward­ing,” James said. 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →