USA — Departments Collaborate to Combat Sexual Assault

WASHINGTON — The depart­ments of Defense and Vet­er­ans Affairs have made sig­nif­i­cant strides in assist­ing sex­u­al assault vic­tims, but more work remains to be done, the direc­tor of the Defense Department’s sex­u­al assault pre­ven­tion and response office said today.

Sex­u­al assault is one of the most under­re­port­ed crimes in soci­ety, pre­sent­ing a chal­lenge to both depart­ments, Kaye Whit­ley said in pre­pared remarks to the House Vet­er­ans’ Affairs Committee’s sub­com­mit­tee on dis­abil­i­ty assis­tance and memo­r­i­al affairs. 

Defense Depart­ment stud­ies indi­cate that about eight of 10 sex­u­al assaults in the mil­i­tary go unre­port­ed, Whit­ley noted. 

“Vic­tims are con­cerned about los­ing their pri­va­cy, fear­ful about being judged, fear­ful of retal­i­a­tion and afraid that peo­ple will view them dif­fer­ent­ly,” she said. “Female and male mil­i­tary vic­tims alike mis­tak­en­ly believe their vic­tim­iza­tion some­how makes them weak and less of a warrior. 

“They wor­ry that their career advance­ment will be dis­rupt­ed and their secu­ri­ty clear­ances revoked,” she added. 

To encour­age more vic­tims to come for­ward, Whit­ley said, the depart­ment offers restrict­ed and unre­strict­ed report­ing options. Restrict­ed report­ing enables vic­tims to access med­ical care and advo­ca­cy ser­vices con­fi­den­tial­ly, she explained. 

Since the restrict­ed report­ing option was intro­duced in 2005, the depart­ment had received 3,486 restrict­ed reports through the end of fis­cal 2009, Whit­ley said. “We believe that num­ber rep­re­sents 3,486 vic­tims who would not have oth­er­wise come for­ward to access care,” she said. “Restrict­ed report­ing is hav­ing the desired effect.” Whit­ley said she’s encour­aged that reports of sex­u­al assault have been increas­ing by about 10 per­cent annu­al­ly over the past three years. Still, the depart­ment would like see more vic­tims come for­ward to report sex­u­al assault, she added. 

She acknowl­edged that the pre­ven­tion of and response to sex­u­al assault are demand­ing under­tak­ings and should­n’t be tack­led alone. She point­ed out the Defense Department’s col­lab­o­ra­tion with oth­er fed­er­al, state and non­prof­it agen­cies to max­i­mize the effec­tive­ness of the department’s pro­gram. One of the department’s key col­lab­o­ra­tions is with the Vet­er­ans Affairs Depart­ment, she noted. 

This col­lab­o­ra­tion recent­ly has paid off with regard to doc­u­men­ta­tion, Whit­ley said. Offi­cials devel­oped the Vic­tim Pref­er­ence Report­ing Form, called DD 2910, to explain report­ing options and to indi­cate the servicemember’s choice of an unre­strict­ed or con­fi­den­tial report. 

VA’s Vet­er­ans Ben­e­fits Admin­is­tra­tion has agreed to accept a copy of this form, she not­ed, signed by both the vic­tim and the sex­u­al assault response coor­di­na­tor or vic­tim advo­cate, as evi­dence of sex­u­al assault. The doc­u­ment can be used as part of the paper­work for a ser­vice-con­nec­tion deter­mi­na­tion, she explained. The goal is to ensure vic­tims have proof of sex­u­al assault, even if the mem­ber nev­er report­ed the inci­dent or made a restrict­ed report and opt­ed not to receive med­ical care, Whit­ley said. 

“Just as the DD 214 is the main basis for proof of mil­i­tary ser­vice, we would like the DD 2910 … to be uni­ver­sal­ly accept­ed as proof that a vic­tim made a report of sex­u­al assault,” she said. 

The depart­ments also work togeth­er to ensure sex­u­al assault vic­tims are con­nect­ed with appro­pri­ate ser­vices, she said, and a VA rep­re­sen­ta­tive par­tic­i­pates on the Defense Department’s Sex­u­al Assault Advi­so­ry Coun­cil, the main over­sight body for the department’s Sex­u­al Assault Pre­ven­tion and Response program. 

While the depart­ments have made progress, more work remains to be done, Whit­ley acknowl­edged, start­ing with one of the exist­ing bar­ri­ers to col­lab­o­ra­tion: state manda­to­ry report­ing laws. 

Ser­vice­mem­bers in a num­ber of states, includ­ing Cal­i­for­nia, who wish to access med­ical care for sex­u­al assault do not have the restrict­ed report­ing option, she explained. California’s Penal Code, for instance, requires health care prac­ti­tion­ers to make a report to law enforce­ment if they sus­pect crimes of a sex­u­al nature have been com­mit­ted. Once they noti­fy civil­ian law enforce­ment, there’s no guar­an­tee that mil­i­tary law enforce­ment won’t be the next step, she said, and they’re oblig­at­ed to inves­ti­gate and noti­fy the command. 

“If our active-duty mem­bers could make restrict­ed reports in fed­er­al­ly fund­ed facil­i­ties, such as a VA Med­ical Cen­ter – no mat­ter where it is locat­ed – we believe this would allow us a wider vari­ety of options to offer vic­tims for care,” Whit­ley said. “We do not know how many more reports we would have received had the restrict­ed report­ing option been avail­able in Cal­i­for­nia. This is a chal­lenge we need help in resolving.” 

Whit­ley reit­er­at­ed the impor­tance of col­lab­o­ra­tion in com­bat­ing sex­u­al assault. 

“Each day, our ser­vice­mem­bers ded­i­cate their lives to pro­tect­ing our coun­try and deserve no less than the very best care and sup­port in return,” she said. “That is why it is so very impor­tant that we work togeth­er to make this pro­gram the best it can be.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →