USA — Conway Predicts Ongoing Marine Presence in Afghanistan

WASHINGTON, Aug. 24, 2010 — The com­man­dant of the Marine Corps pre­dict­ed a con­tin­ued Marine pres­ence in south­ern Afghanistan well after July 2011, when a trans­fer of secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ties to the Afghan gov­ern­ment is slat­ed to begin.

Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James T. Conway
Marine Corps Com­man­dant Gen. James T. Con­way holds a press brief­ing at the Pen­ta­gon, Aug. 24, 2010, to talk about his just-com­plet­ed trip through U.S. Cen­tral Command’s area of respon­si­bil­i­ty.
DoD pho­to by R. D. Ward
Click to enlarge

“I hon­est­ly think it will be a few years before con­di­tions on the ground are such that turnover will be pos­si­ble for us,” Gen. James T. Con­way told reporters today dur­ing a Pen­ta­gon briefing. 

Con­way briefed reporters on his recent trip to the Cen­tral Com­mand area of respon­si­bil­i­ty, dur­ing which he vis­it­ed Afghanistan, Pak­istan, Roma­nia and Ger­many. He spent most of his trip vis­it­ing Marines and sailors in south­ern Afghanistan’s Hel­mand province, an offi­cial said. 

Hel­mand and its neigh­bor­ing province of Kan­da­har are the birth­place of the Tal­iban, Con­way not­ed, and the con­di­tions there vary from oth­er regions. “If you look at the num­bers of attacks, num­bers of casu­al­ties; if you look at the focus of the main effort – that is, the view of the com­man­ders there – the fight is in the south,” he said. 

Con­way declined to pin­point the length of time a Marine pres­ence would be need­ed there. How­ev­er, “I do not believe con­di­tions in … Hel­mand or Kan­da­har … are going to be such that we think we can sim­ply turn over to Afghan forces and leave,” he said. 

The key to suc­cess in Hel­mand, Con­way said, is to move people’s loy­al­ties off the fence and onto the side of Afghan and inter­na­tion­al secu­ri­ty forces. While slow to hap­pen, he’s see­ing signs of progress toward this end, he said, with less cor­rupt and bet­ter-skilled police forces, more projects, and dis­trict and sub­dis­trict gov­er­nors over­see­ing the rule of law. 

“When [the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force] is able to con­struct a self-con­tained cell phone sys­tem,” Con­way said, “I’m con­vinced that tips and intel­li­gence will pick up, mak­ing it vir­tu­al­ly impos­si­ble for the Tal­iban to oper­ate while hid­ing behind the citizens.” 

Con­way not­ed that the Tal­iban are try­ing to “string” out the sit­u­a­tion in Mar­ja, locat­ed in Hel­mand province, for as long as they can since they real­ize the loss will be a major defeat for them. 

“We are deal­ing with a very intel­li­gent ene­my here who real­izes that Mar­ja, prob­a­bly more than any oth­er bat­tle in Afghanistan, has the cap­ture of an inter­na­tion­al audi­ence,” he said. “And so they’re not giv­ing up that easily. 

“They’re snip­ing at us, there’s throw­ing a few rounds here and there, they’re shoot­ing at our heli­copters,” he con­tin­ued, “but main­ly, they’re intim­i­dat­ing peo­ple … so as to main­tain a pres­ence there and keep Mar­ja from being, again, this strate­gic vic­to­ry on the part of Marines in the south of Helmand.” 

Con­way praised the Marines serv­ing in Hel­mand province. They embody the mean­ing of expe­di­tionary, he said. Their abil­i­ty to be fast, flex­i­ble and lethal throws the ene­my off bal­ance, he explained, and it’s not uncom­mon to find units away from their for­ward oper­at­ing bases for 30 days at a time. 

“Using supe­ri­or fire­pow­er and bat­tle­field mobil­i­ty, I believe that they hold the ini­tia­tive,” he said of the Marines. “Even in the height of the Taliban’s so-called fight­ing sea­son, they are mak­ing the ene­my react to them.” 

Con­way also acknowl­edged the chal­lenges that lie ahead. The Afghan army’s capac­i­ty is hit­ting a crit­i­cal stage, he said. Army Lt. Gen. William B. Cald­well IV, com­man­der of NATO Train­ing Mis­sion Afghanistan and Com­bined Secu­ri­ty Tran­si­tion Com­mand Afghanistan, is ahead of sched­ule in train­ing Afghan infantry com­pa­nies and kan­daks, or bat­tal­ions, he said, although the qual­i­ty “varies widely.” 

But the tough­est part of Caldwell’s mis­sion- recruit­ing and train­ing Afghan mil­i­tary avi­a­tors and enablers — lies ahead, Con­way said. Enablers are the equiv­a­lent of the Marines’ com­bat sup­port units, he explained. 

“Those troops will require a high­er lev­el of edu­ca­tion and skills train­ing than his ‘grunt’ units have required to date,” he said. “That said, the orga­ni­za­tion and approach that he and his joint com­bined team have tak­en appears to be, to the inter­est­ed observ­er, just right for the task at hand.” 

A mil­i­tary force shapes the envi­ron­ment, Con­way said, with bet­ter secu­ri­ty enabling oth­er lines of oper­a­tion, such as the econ­o­my and gov­ern­ment, to take shape. 

“That’s why what Gen­er­al Cald­well and his peo­ple are doing is so impor­tant,” Con­way said. “That’s why we’re part­ner­ing right now, almost on every patrol, with Afghan secu­ri­ty forces when we go out. That’s why we want to pos­ture the police, so they can be successful.” 

The goal is to tran­si­tion an increas­ing amount of respon­si­bil­i­ties to host nation forces. 

“When we think that we have suf­fi­cient­ly beat­en down the insur­gency in the area, we have suf­fi­cient­ly built up the Afghan capa­bil­i­ty to deal with what’s there, then I think we have done the essence of what we were sent there to do,” he said. 

Con­way acknowl­edged reports that indi­cate Amer­i­cans are “increas­ing­ly grow­ing tired of the war,” but he not­ed that the last of the 30,000 troops Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma ordered to Afghanistan have only just arrived this month. 

Mil­i­tary lead­ers need to do a bet­ter job of con­vinc­ing Amer­i­cans of the need for the war in Afghanistan, Con­way said. 

“I don’t think that we have done a strong enough job in con­vinc­ing the Amer­i­can peo­ple there are good and just rea­sons why we have to destroy al-Qai­da and the asso­ci­at­ed Tal­iban in Afghanistan, sim­i­lar to what we did in Iraq,” he said, “cer­tain­ly to the point where there is no future oppor­tu­ni­ty for safe haven, cer­tain­ly to the degree that we can cre­ate con­di­tions for that Afghan gov­ern­ment to rule the coun­try and avoid safe haven.” 

While Amer­i­cans may not all sup­port the war, the gen­er­al not­ed that they firm­ly sup­port the troops. “I am so proud of our Amer­i­can pub­lic, that regard­less of how they see what hap­pened in Iraq or what’s hap­pen­ing in Afghanistan, they sup­port the troops,” Con­way said. “And that’s the mes­sage that they get from me; that’s the mes­sage that they see when they come home to dwell. And in that regard, I’m just incred­i­bly proud of our country.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →