USA — Casey Shares Vision of National Guard’s Future

NEW ORLEANS — Return­ing the Nation­al Guard to its Cold War-era strate­gic reserve pos­ture is not the answer when Defense lead­ers dis­cuss the future, the Army’s chief of staff said here yes­ter­day.

“No one wants to go back to the Guard being just a strate­gic reserve,” Army Gen. George W. Casey Jr. said dur­ing a vis­it to the 2010 Nation­al Guard Fam­i­ly Pro­gram Vol­un­teer Work­shop. “We have come way too far. Half of the Guard are com­bat vet­er­ans. That’s a fun­da­men­tal­ly dif­fer­ent force and, as a result, it’s a fun­da­men­tal­ly dif­fer­ent Army.” 

The Unit­ed States is in an era of per­sis­tent con­flict, Casey said, adding that he antic­i­pates a sig­nif­i­cant oper­a­tional tem­po for the next decade. That fol­lows nine years of war in which the Nation­al Guard has already played a cru­cial role. 

“We are active­ly work­ing through a study that will answer the ques­tion for us: ‘What should the role of the Guard and Reserve be in an era where we’re like­ly to have to rely on them con­tin­u­ous­ly for a long peri­od of time?’ ” he said. 

The Army could not have accom­plished what it has over last nine years with­out the Nation­al Guard, Casey said. “It’s Min­ute­men and women that are hold­ing this force togeth­er,” he told the group. “Thank you for what you have done to sup­port this Army and this country.” 

The gen­er­al and his wife, Sheila, spent about two hours talk­ing with vol­un­teers who sup­port Nation­al Guard fam­i­lies. An event sched­uled in the same room was can­celled as the cou­ple lin­gered for an hour beyond their planned vis­it to address ques­tions from a stand­ing-room-only audi­ence of Guard fam­i­ly members. 

“It’s not just the Guard fam­i­lies,” Casey said. “It’s the entire vol­un­teer force. We real­ized back in 2007 that we had to sig­nif­i­cant­ly increase what we were doing for all Army fam­i­lies, because of what we were ask­ing of them. We were ask­ing of them far more than what our pro­grams were delivering.” 

Spend­ing on fam­i­ly pro­grams has dou­bled, and an Army covenant recom­mit­ted lead­er­ship to sup­port­ing active, Guard and reserve families. 

“There’s always more work to do, but I think it’s been very well-received,” Casey said. 

The Caseys have a non­com­mis­sioned offi­cer son on active duty with the Army Reserve, mak­ing Sheila Casey both a soldier’s wife and a soldier’s moth­er. Meet­ing with vol­un­teers to whom she can relate not just through empa­thy but also by first-hand expe­ri­ence, she empha­sized self-care. 

“Part of the prob­lem that care­givers have is that they don’t take care of them­selves,” she said. “Every­body else comes first. What I end up see­ing is peo­ple who after extend­ed deploy­ments … are burned out and they’re tired. 

“What I ask them to do is to change that and to start putting them­selves first, on top of the pile,” she added. “If they do that, then they will have the strength and the where­with­al to take care of their families.” 

Sheila Casey tells mil­i­tary spous­es to find one thing that they love to do that is just for them­selves and take the time to do that. 

Her hus­band briefed Guard fam­i­ly pro­gram vol­un­teers on the Guard’s trans­formed role since Sept. 11, 2001, and Defense Depart­ment lead­ers’ goals for a future of more pre­dictable deploy­ments and more time at home between deployments. 

Stand­ing in front of a chrono­log­i­cal chart dis­play­ing the Guard’s con­tri­bu­tions in the more than 60 years since World War II, the gen­er­al explained how a deci­sion made from lessons learned from the Viet­nam War trans­formed the Guard. 

“The gen­er­al con­ven­tion­al wis­dom com­ing out of that peri­od … that we had to rely on the draft and could not rely on the Guard and Reserve broke the active Army,” Casey said. 

That’s too sim­plis­tic, … but … that led [to] the total force pol­i­cy, and they said, ‘We will nev­er again go to war with­out the Guard and Reserve.’ ” 

The Guard’s role increased in the ear­ly 1990s fol­low­ing Oper­a­tion Desert Storm, and notably shift­ed in the days after the 9/11 attacks. It has not dimin­ished since. 

“From Desert Storm, there has been rel­a­tive­ly con­sis­tent reliance on the Guard and reserve,” Casey said. “Since Sept. 11, we have relied on the Guard and Reserve for a dura­tion and a scope that real­ly has been unprece­dent­ed in the last 60 years. 

“We are pret­ty close to being one Army,” he con­tin­ued. “We have pur­pose­ly inte­grat­ed the Guard into every­thing that we do. We have made a huge change with the Guard over the last nine years. … None of us want to go back to hav­ing the Guard as just a strate­gic reserve.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twitter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →