U.S. Remains Committed to F‑35 Program, Panetta Says

OTTAWA, Ontario, March 28, 2012 — Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta yes­ter­day reaf­firmed the Defense Department’s com­mit­ment to the F‑35 joint strike fight­er pro­gram and to ensur­ing it remains with­in the defense strategy’s bud­get.

The sec­re­tary spoke at a news con­fer­ence fol­low­ing a meet­ing with Mex­i­can and Cana­di­an defense lead­ers here.

“As part of the defense strat­e­gy that the Unit­ed States went through and has put in place, we have made very clear that we are 100 per­cent com­mit­ted to the devel­op­ment of the F‑35,” he said. “It’s a fifth-gen­er­a­tion fight­er, [and] we absolute­ly need it for the future.”

Acknowl­edg­ing that the Defense Depart­ment has to be vig­i­lant and pro­vide as much over­sight as pos­si­ble as the air­craft con­tin­ues to be devel­oped, Panet­ta said Pen­ta­gon offi­cials are con­fi­dent that “this plane can do every­thing that it’s being asked to do in terms of per­for­mance.

“We’ve been test­ing it, and we con­tin­ue to eval­u­ate it as we pro­ceed,” he con­tin­ued. “And we’ve made very clear to the indus­tries involved in its pro­duc­tion that they have to keep it with­in the cross-con­fine­ments that we’ve pro­vid­ed with regards to this plane.”

Panet­ta not­ed the price of each air­craft varies from vari­ant to vari­ant, with three types involved in the program’s devel­op­ment. Cana­da signed on for the project’s pro­duc­tion, sus­tain­ment and fol­low-on devel­op­ment phase on Dec. 11, 2006, along with Aus­tralia, and the Unit­ed King­dom.

Cana­di­an Defense Min­is­ter Peter MacK­ay called the F‑35 an exam­ple of inter­op­er­abil­i­ty as his coun­try faces sim­i­lar chal­lenges with the joint strike fight­er pro­gram.

“In addi­tion, I would add that this is the air­craft that the Roy­al Cana­di­an Air Force, after an exten­sive inter­nal exam­i­na­tion of capa­bil­i­ties and what was on the mar­ket, came to us and said, ‘This the plane we need. This is the plane we want for a whole num­ber of rea­sons.’ ”

MacK­ay said “due dili­gence and analy­sis” are nec­es­sary to ensure tax­pay­ers are well-served and their best inter­ests are con­sid­ered.

“On the aspect of bud­gets as we go for­ward, every depart­ment of gov­ern­ment — every defense depart­ment, cer­tain­ly all of our NATO part­ners, our Mex­i­can col­leagues [and] our friends around the globe — are look­ing to pri­or­i­tize their defense spend­ing,” he said. “It [should] come as no sur­prise to any­one here that Cana­da is going through that exact same process in deter­min­ing what our defense needs are at home.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →