U.S.-Pakistan Must Keep Communications Lines Open

WASHINGTON, June 16, 2011 — The U.S.-Pakistan rela­tion­ship is com­pli­cat­ed, but the two coun­tries must keep the lines of com­mu­ni­ca­tion open, said Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates dur­ing his last news con­fer­ence today.
Gates and Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, the chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the mutu­al depen­dence is too strong for either coun­try to end rela­tions with the oth­er.

“It is com­pli­cat­ed, but as … I’ve said often before, we need each oth­er, and we need each oth­er more than just in the con­text of Afghanistan,” Gates said. “Pak­istan is an impor­tant play­er in terms of region­al sta­bil­i­ty and in terms of Cen­tral Asia. And so my view is that this is a rela­tion­ship where we just need to keep work­ing at it.”

Mullen said the rela­tion­ship is still crit­i­cal, and he will con­tin­ue to work with Pak­istani Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ash­faq Kayani.

“What the Pak­istani military’s going through right now, obvi­ous­ly is con­sid­er­able intro­spec­tion based on recent events,” Mullen said. “That makes a lot of sense to me. They’ve got some ques­tions. I know Gen­er­al Kayani well enough to know (that) what he cares about the most is not him­self: What he cares about the most is his insti­tu­tion.”

Pak­istan is a part­ner against ter­ror­ists, Gates and Mullen said. They point­ed out that Pak­istan has 140,000 troops along its bor­der with Afghanistan. The Pak­istani mil­i­tary has cleaned South Waziris­tan and the Swat Val­ley of the Tal­iban.

The Unit­ed States ships a major­i­ty of its sup­plies to Afghanistan across Pak­istan, and keep­ing those lines of com­mu­ni­ca­tion open is also lit­er­al­ly and fig­u­ra­tive­ly impor­tant. Final­ly, both men point­ed out that Pak­istan is a nuclear coun­try. Main­tain­ing good rela­tions with Pak­istan could help ensure nuclear know-how or even weapons don’t fall into the hands of ter­ror­ists.

Gates respond­ed to a ques­tion about Ayman Zawahiri’s “pro­mo­tion” to lead a‑Qaida. “I’m not sure it’s a posi­tion any­body should aspire to, under the cir­cum­stances,” he said. “I think he will face some chal­lenges. Bin Laden has been the leader of al-Qai­da, essen­tial­ly since its incep­tion. In that par­tic­u­lar con­text, he had a pecu­liar charis­ma that I think Zawahiri does not have. I think he was much more oper­a­tional­ly engaged than we have the sense Zawahiri has been. I’ve read that there is some sus­pi­cion with­in al-Qai­da of Zawahiri because he’s Egypt­ian.”

The al-Qai­da announce­ment, though, high­lights the fact that the orga­ni­za­tion is not going away, its leader still hate Amer­i­ca and it remains com­mit­ted to ter­ror, the sec­re­tary said.

Amer­i­cans are wor­ried about the war in Afghanistan. He said that that with the excep­tion of the first cou­ple of years of World War II, “there has nev­er been a pop­u­lar war in the Unit­ed States in our whole his­to­ry. They’ve all been con­tro­ver­sial.”

He said the war weari­ness rests heav­i­ly on all. “The key is how do we com­plete our mis­sion, as we have large­ly done in Iraq, in a way that pro­tects Amer­i­can nation­al secu­ri­ty inter­ests and the Amer­i­can peo­ple and con­tributes to sta­bil­i­ty?” Gates said. “I think most peo­ple would say we’ve been large­ly suc­cess­ful in that respect in Iraq. I think we’re on a path to do that in Afghanistan.”

The cost of the wars are huge, but it is declin­ing. “The costs of these wars will go down between FY ’11 and FY ’12 by $40 bil­lion, from $160 (bil­lion dol­lars) to less than $120 bil­lion,” Gates said. “There’s every rea­son to believe that between FY ’12 and FY ’13 there would be anoth­er sig­nif­i­cant reduc­tion. And, of course, with the Lis­bon agree­ment, the size of our forces left in Afghanistan in Decem­ber of 2014 would be a small frac­tion of what they are today.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →