U.S. Must Prepare for Varied Threats, Gates Says

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. — The U.S. mil­i­tary must be able to con­tend with a wide range of asym­met­ric and con­ven­tion­al threats now and in the future, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates said here today.
In a speech at the U.S. Air Force Acad­e­my, the sec­re­tary empha­sized that although he has pushed the ser­vices to insti­tu­tion­al­ize asym­met­ric and uncon­ven­tion­al war­fare capa­bil­i­ties, he knows those are not the only kinds of mis­sions for which the mil­i­tary must be pre­pared.

“But my mes­sage to the ser­vices is being dis­tort­ed by some and mis­un­der­stood by oth­ers,” Gates said. “At the Navy League last year, I sug­gest­ed that the Navy should think anew about the role of air­craft car­ri­ers and the size of amphibi­ous mod­ern­iza­tion pro­grams. The speech was char­ac­ter­ized by some as my doubt­ing the val­ue of car­ri­ers and amphibi­ous assault capa­bil­i­ties altogether. 

“At West Point last week,” he con­tin­ued, “I ques­tioned the wis­dom of send­ing large land armies into major con­flicts in Asia, Africa and the Mid­dle East, and sug­gest­ed the Army should think about the num­ber and role of heavy armored for­ma­tions for the future. That’s been inter­pret­ed as my ques­tion­ing the need for the Army at all — or at least one at its present size — the val­ue of heavy armor, gen­er­al­ly, and the even the wis­dom of our involve­ment in Afghanistan.” 

He added that his advo­ca­cy for unmanned aer­i­al vehi­cles may be con­strued as an attack on bombers and fighters. 

“But my actions and my bud­gets over the last four years belie these mis­tak­en inter­pre­ta­tions,” said Gates, not­ing that the Defense Depart­ment is mod­ern­iz­ing the tac­ti­cal air and bomber fleet. 

“For the Navy,” he added, “I have approved con­tin­u­ing the car­ri­er pro­gram, but also more attack sub­marines, a new bal­lis­tic mis­sile sub­ma­rine, and more guid­ed mis­sile destroy­ers. For the Army, we will invest bil­lions mod­ern­iz­ing armored vehi­cles, tac­ti­cal com­mu­ni­ca­tions and oth­er ground com­bat sys­tems. And the Marine Corps’ exist­ing amphibi­ous assault capa­bil­i­ties will be upgrad­ed and new sys­tems fund­ed for the ship-to-shore mission.” 

The sec­re­tary point­ed out that dur­ing his tenure he approved the largest increas­es in the size of the Army and Marine Corps in decades, stopped Air Force and Navy draw­downs, and sup­port­ed and presided over the surges in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

“All that said, I have also been try­ing to get across to all of the mil­i­tary ser­vices that they will have many and var­ied mis­sions in the 21st cen­tu­ry,” he said. “As a result, they must think hard­er about the entire range of these mis­sions and how to achieve the right bal­ance of capa­bil­i­ties in an era of tight budgets.” 

The Unit­ed States requires all of the ser­vices’ capa­bil­i­ties, the sec­re­tary said. 

“But the way we use them in the 21st cen­tu­ry will almost cer­tain­ly not be the way they were used in the 20th cen­tu­ry,” he added. “Above all, the ser­vices must not return to the last century’s mind­set after Iraq and Afghanistan, but rather pre­pare and plan for a very dif­fer­ent world than we all left in 2001.” 

Mov­ing for­ward, all of the ser­vices need to think aggres­sive­ly about how to tru­ly take advan­tage of being part of a joint force for a vari­ety of mis­sions, Gates said. 

“We must always guard against the old bureau­crat­ic pol­i­tics and parochial ten­den­cies –- espe­cial­ly after the Iraq and Afghanistan cam­paigns wind down and bud­gets become tight,” he said. 

“It’s eas­i­er to be joint and talk joint when there’s mon­ey to go around and a war to be won,” Gates added. “It’s much hard­er to do when tough choic­es have to be made with­in and between the mil­i­tary ser­vices –- between what is ide­al from a par­tic­u­lar ser­vice per­spec­tive, and what will get the job done tak­ing into account broad­er pri­or­i­ties and considerations.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →