US Army, US Air Force Conduct First Energy Forum

WASHINGTON, July 21, 2011 — The Army and Air Force con­vened their first joint ener­gy forum here this week to demon­strate that they are mak­ing respon­si­ble and effi­cient ener­gy devel­op­ment a pri­or­i­ty.

Kevin Geiss, deputy assis­tant sec­re­tary of the Air Force for ener­gy, and Richard Kidd, deputy assis­tant sec­re­tary of the Army for ener­gy and sus­tain­abil­i­ty, field­ed ques­tions about ener­gy devel­op­ment and invest­ments yes­ter­day in a “DODLive” blog­gers roundtable. 

The Army has increased the pri­or­i­ty of ener­gy projects, Kidd said, and is talk­ing about ener­gy as it nev­er has before. For its part, Geiss said, the Air Force is con­tin­u­ing a his­to­ry of invest­ment in effi­cient ener­gy development. 

At its core, in the DNA of the Air Force is to respect tech­nol­o­gy and the evo­lu­tions and rev­o­lu­tions in tech­nol­o­gy, and how that can enable us to do our job bet­ter and more effec­tive­ly in nation­al secu­ri­ty,” he said. “We are now spend­ing about $200 mil­lion a year in tech­nol­o­gy that is relat­ed to energy.” 

But Kidd and Geiss empha­sized that to ensure the suc­cess, the Army and Air Force must work in con­cert with the Defense Department’s over­all priorities. 

Tak­ing care of our sol­diers, sailors, air­men [and] their fam­i­lies, and hav­ing a healthy Depart­ment of Defense … is an over­all pri­or­i­ty,” Geiss said, stress­ing the need to empha­size the broad­er ben­e­fits to ensure the suc­cess of ener­gy projects. 

“It’s impor­tant that we under­stand the sec­ond- and third-order effects of the ini­tia­tives we are propos­ing from the ener­gy per­spec­tive [that] may also have addi­tion­al ben­e­fits of decreas­ing our main­te­nance … costs,” he said. “So if we can show a broad­er ben­e­fit on an ini­tia­tive that we may be cham­pi­oning because it’s ener­gy-relat­ed, I think that helps things to sur­vive a lit­tle bit bet­ter in this process, because you are also bring­ing val­ue to oth­er areas of the depart­ment … than the folks that are sim­ply look­ing at how much fuel we are purchasing.” 

The con­ver­sa­tion shift­ed to the roles oth­er ser­vice branch­es, pri­vate indus­try, civil­ians and com­mu­ni­ties can play in encour­ag­ing alter­na­tive ener­gy growth. When any one branch of the mil­i­tary devel­ops new tech­nolo­gies around ener­gy, Geiss said, all branch­es benefit. 

Our goals are the same,” he said. “We want to reduce the bur­den on our infantry­men, our warfight­ers and our convoys.” 

Part­ner­ships with indus­try, includ­ing pow­er providers, can play an impor­tant role in bring­ing ener­gy solu­tions to the table, Kidd said. 

Com­mu­ni­ties are cru­cial, the mil­i­tary ener­gy experts said. 

“Our instal­la­tions do not exist in iso­la­tion from the local com­mu­ni­ty,” Kidd said. “We are part­ners with that local com­mu­ni­ty. And as we look for solu­tions for waste and ener­gy and water, we have to look for solu­tions that work with the local community.” 

The Army has launched an effort to min­i­mize waste­water and ener­gy con­sump­tion, he added. “And we can’t do that with­out the help of local com­mu­ni­ties,” he said. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →