Transcom Provides America’s Greatest Advantage, Commander Says

WASHINGTON, Feb. 7, 2011 — The great­est advan­tage that the Unit­ed States has over any poten­tial ene­my is the abil­i­ty to project and sus­tain forces any­where in the world, the com­man­der of U.S. Trans­porta­tion Com­mand said here today.
“No oth­er nation can do what we do,” Air Force Gen. Dun­can J. McN­abb, said at the Cen­ter for Strate­gic and Inter­na­tion­al Stud­ies.

A decade of war has meant Transcom is agile and prac­ticed at deliv­er­ing equip­ment, materiel and peo­ple where it needs to be, when it needs to be there, he said. The ser­vice por­tions of the com­mand –- the Air Force’s Air Mobil­i­ty Com­mand, the Navy’s Mil­i­tary Sealift Com­mand and the Army’s Sur­face Deploy­ment and Dis­tri­b­u­tion Com­mand –- work togeth­er close­ly and con­stant­ly, he added.

Expe­ri­ence since Sept. 11, 2001, has changed the way the com­mand does busi­ness, the gen­er­al said. Before, he explained, deliv­er­ing logis­tics was rel­a­tive­ly straight­for­ward –- offi­cials chose a mode of trans­port and sent the car­go on its way.

“What we’ve found, like the rest of the indus­try, is that if you can fig­ure out how to do this inter­modal­ly, you can fig­ure out where I can go com­mer­cial­ly, and then where I need to go mil­i­tar­i­ly, or I can go sur­face or air, depend­ing on the threat,” he said.

This allows plan­ners to ensure they are tak­ing care of warfight­ers while deliv­er­ing peo­ple, sup­plies and equip­ment in the most cost-effi­cient man­ner, he said.

McN­abb cit­ed the mine-resis­tant, ambush-pro­tect­ed all-ter­rain vehi­cles for Afghanistan as an exam­ple. Indus­try offi­cials fig­ured they could pro­duce 500 of the life-sav­ing vehi­cles a month. When the vehi­cles first start­ed rolling off the assem­bly line, they were loaded aboard C‑17 air­craft and flown to Afghanistan.

“The ques­tion came: If we can build more, can you trans­port more?” McN­abb said.

In the mid­dle of the Afghanistan troop surge, indus­try offi­cials came to Transcom and said they could pro­duce 1,000 vehi­cles a month. That ran into Transcom’s require­ment to move units into Afghanistan, McN­abb said, “and we start­ed look­ing at dif­fer­ent ways to accom­plish this.”

The com­mand solved the prob­lem by get­ting the vehi­cles to the U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand the­ater of oper­a­tions via ship and load­ing them aboard air­craft only for the final leg of the jour­ney. Because it was a short hop, the air­craft car­ried five M‑ATVs instead of three, and they went direct­ly to the units in Afghanistan.

Anoth­er exam­ple is the open­ing of the North­ern Sup­ply Route. High-val­ue and pure­ly mil­i­tary car­go goes to Afghanistan via air. Oth­er sup­plies go via ship to Karachi, Pak­istan, and then over­land into Afghanistan. Transcom forged a series of routes from the Baltic republics, through Rus­sia and the Cen­tral Asian republics, or via the Cau­ca­sus republics through Cen­tral Asia to Afghanistan.

The com­mand took advan­tage of the con­tacts that pri­vate com­pa­nies main­tain to forge these routes, McN­abb said.

“That is the real advan­tage these com­pa­nies bring,” he said. The com­pa­nies have planes and ships, he added, but they also have the net­work of con­tacts in the region that allows them to speed the car­go through.

Now, if routes are blocked, oth­er routes can take up the slack, the gen­er­al said.

Look­ing ahead, Transcom has the mis­sion of sus­tain­ing the ser­vice mem­bers in Afghanistan while re-deploy­ing the final 48,000 Amer­i­cans in Iraq by the end of the year.

The com­mand also must plan for con­tin­gen­cies. Last year, for exam­ple, Transcom had to pro­vide logis­tics for the hun­dreds of thou­sands of Haitians affect­ed by a mas­sive earth­quake and also sup­port­ed the response to the Gulf of Mex­i­co oil dis­as­ter. The com­mand also lift­ed goods to Pak­istan when that nation expe­ri­enced cat­a­stroph­ic flood­ing, and had to do all this while main­tain­ing the logis­tics need­ed to fight two wars.

Chal­lenges remain, McN­abb said, not­ing that Transcom needs the ser­vices to get new air-refu­el­ing tankers. Replac­ing the 50-year-old KC-135s will save mil­lions of dol­lars, he added. The com­mand also is invest­ing in defend­ing its com­put­er sys­tems. About 90 per­cent of Transcom’s busi­ness takes place on unpro­tect­ed net­works, McN­abb said, and 33,326 “com­put­er net­work events” took place against the com­mand last year.

Defense is anoth­er pri­or­i­ty. “After heli­copters, our air­craft are the most shot at,” McN­abb said. Last year, he added, 125 air­craft were shot at, and 15 were hit.

As the com­mand con­tin­u­al­ly works to re-invent itself, McN­abb said, the Transcom team — active duty and reserve com­po­nent ser­vice­mem­bers and civil­ians, along with pri­vate indus­try part­ners — always is look­ing for ways to per­form the mis­sion bet­ter.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →