Terrorism, Weapons Top Threat List, Gates Says

ST. PETERSBURG, Rus­sia, March 21, 2011 — In a nation he spent much of his career study­ing and a city he last vis­it­ed at the end of the Cold War, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates answered ques­tions here today from Russ­ian naval offi­cers about the U.S. Defense Depart­ment, its prob­lems and its future.
After deliv­er­ing a speech at the new State Russ­ian Naval Muse­um, Gates invit­ed ques­tions from his audi­ence of mid-lev­el offi­cers from the Kuznetsov Naval Acad­e­my.

“The biggest threats we face are actu­al­ly those where inter­na­tion­al coop­er­a­tion is sig­nif­i­cant­ly required,” Gates said. “The first is ter­ror­ism, … and the oth­er is the pro­lif­er­a­tion of weapons of mass destruc­tion, par­tic­u­lar­ly pro­lif­er­a­tion in states that have threat­ened to destroy oth­er states.” 

Ter­ror­ism sent the Unit­ed States into Afghanistan and into a dif­fi­cult fight with al-Qai­da, he added. 

Nuclear pro­lif­er­a­tion in Iran brought “all the per­ma­nent mem­bers of the U.N. Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil — the Unit­ed States, Rus­sia, Chi­na, Great Britain, France — togeth­er to try and bring pres­sure to bear” on that nation, he said. 

“It is cer­tain­ly my hope,” the sec­re­tary added, “that none of us ever have to use mil­i­tary force to deal with these pro­lif­er­a­tion prob­lems, but rather that we can per­suade these coun­tries … to give up these weapons or weapons pro­grams voluntarily.” 

One of the biggest U.S. defense prob­lems, Gates said, involves very expen­sive weapons sys­tems ordered many years ago. Some have end­ed up cost­ing much more than antic­i­pat­ed, and oth­ers “have proven not to be use­ful in the 21st cen­tu­ry,” he told the Russ­ian officers. 

The sec­re­tary said he’s made progress on the prob­lem, sav­ing Amer­i­can tax­pay­ers $300 bil­lion or more as a result. 

“But being able to be more selec­tive about the weapons pro­grams that we have,” he said, “mak­ing them rel­e­vant to [tomorrow’s] chal­lenges and get­ting them deliv­ered on time and as bud­get­ed is a chal­lenge that every mil­i­tary in the world faces in the 21st century.” 

The world is not going to face the kinds of threats it expe­ri­enced in the 20th cen­tu­ry, the sec­re­tary said. 

“We will face a range of poten­tial con­flicts that slides along a spec­trum of lethal­i­ty,” he explained. “We will con­front non­state actors that poten­tial­ly have the capa­bil­i­ties of states, whether it’s in the cyber area or in the case of Hezbol­lah, which has tens of thou­sands of rock­ets and mis­siles — more than most gov­ern­ments in the world.” 

Per­haps the biggest nation­al secu­ri­ty and strate­gic chal­lenge, Gates told the group, is prepar­ing mil­i­taries for diverse threats and secu­ri­ty chal­lenges under lim­it­ed bud­gets and get­ting the max­i­mum pos­si­ble flex­i­bil­i­ty for using those capa­bil­i­ties tech­no­log­i­cal­ly and in terms of training. 

Gates said the way weapons are pro­cured is a major struc­tur­al change need­ed in the U.S. mil­i­tary. Most ser­vices still buy their own weapons, he added, “but in fact a num­ber of those capa­bil­i­ties can be shared among all of the services.” 

“As we have learned to fight joint­ly and are struc­tured joint­ly,” he added, “we need to learn how to buy weapons jointly.” 

The sec­re­tary cit­ed remote­ly pilot­ed vehi­cles as an exam­ple, not­ing that each ser­vice has its own pro­gram for buy­ing them. “And we think we could save a lot of mon­ey if they went togeth­er in these pro­grams,” he said. 

In a dis­cus­sion of train­ing and edu­ca­tion for U.S. ser­vice mem­bers, Gates acknowl­edged repeat­ed rota­tions for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have cut into full-spec­trum train­ing for the whole range of mis­sions that each ser­vice is sup­posed to perform. 

Turn­ing to U.S.-Russian coop­er­a­tion, Gates said he would like to see more effort put into an exchange pro­gram for Russ­ian and U.S. mil­i­tary offi­cers and non­com­mis­sioned officers.

“We would more than wel­come exchang­ing stu­dents between our pro­fes­sion­al mil­i­tary train­ing and edu­ca­tion orga­ni­za­tions and Russia’s,” Gates said. The effort would ben­e­fit both coun­tries, he said, and he promised to raise the issue with Russ­ian Defense Min­is­ter Ana­toliy Serdyukov dur­ing a meet­ing tomorrow. 

“It would do both of our mil­i­taries good to learn from one anoth­er and have the expe­ri­ence of spend­ing time togeth­er,” he added, not­ing that the U.S. mil­i­tary ser­vices “would be very inter­est­ed in this at every lev­el, not just the most-senior offi­cers but mid-grade offi­cers and even non­com­mis­sioned officers.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twitter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →