Technology Extends Stratcom’s Priorities

WASHINGTON, March 30, 2011 — U.S. Strate­gic Command’s pri­or­i­ty is to deter nuclear attack on the Unit­ed States and its allies, but broad­er respon­si­bil­i­ties in the 21st cen­tu­ry include cyber­se­cu­ri­ty and mis­sile defense, the organization’s top offi­cer said here yes­ter­day.
Air Force Gen. C. Robert Kehler tes­ti­fied before the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee for the first time since he assumed com­mand of Strat­com in Jan­u­ary.

“Of the threats we face, weapons of mass destruc­tion clear­ly rep­re­sent the great­est threat to the Amer­i­can peo­ple, par­tic­u­lar­ly when they are pur­sued or pos­sessed by vio­lent extrem­ists or state pro­lif­er­a­tors,” Kehler said. 

While nuclear deter­rence is Stratcom’s No. 1 pri­or­i­ty, the gen­er­al added, the com­mand also has broad­er respon­si­bil­i­ties in the 21st cen­tu­ry, such as sup­port­ing U.S. Africa Com­mand, he said. 

“We pro­vid­ed B‑2s ear­ly in [Oper­a­tion Odyssey Dawn] for Africom’s use,” Kehler said. “We are also tak­ing steps … to make sure they have the space capa­bil­i­ties they need, to make sure the net­works there are oper­a­tional and have suf­fi­cient capac­i­ty and are secured.” 

Strat­com also has long-term engage­ment in oth­er regions of the world in sup­port of oth­er com­bat­ant com­man­ders, the gen­er­al added. Such activ­i­ties, he said, “are pri­mar­i­ly syn­chro­niz­ing — syn­chro­niz­ing plan­ning and capa­bil­i­ties for things like mis­sile defense; intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance; elec­tron­ic war­fare; and com­bat­ing weapons of mass destruction.” 

Anoth­er pri­or­i­ty is to improve capa­bil­i­ties and oper­at­ing con­cepts in the civ­il and nation­al secu­ri­ty areas of space and cyber­space, he added. 

“Space is increas­ing­ly con­test­ed, con­gest­ed and com­pet­i­tive,” Kehler said, “and its impor­tance to the Unit­ed States goes far beyond nation­al security.” 

Essen­tial objec­tives include ensur­ing unin­ter­rupt­ed access to space and space-based capa­bil­i­ties, improv­ing aware­ness of objects and activ­i­ties in space, and enhanc­ing the pro­tec­tion and resilience of crit­i­cal sys­tems, the gen­er­al said. Achiev­ing those objec­tives, he said, demands con­tin­ued invest­ments to improve space sit­u­a­tion­al aware­ness and to sus­tain crit­i­cal space capa­bil­i­ties while pur­su­ing increased oppor­tu­ni­ties with allies and com­mer­cial partners. 

Strat­com and its sub­uni­fied com­mand U.S. Cyber Com­mand, he said, “are work­ing hard to improve our orga­ni­za­tions and rela­tion­ships, enhance our net­work sit­u­a­tion­al aware­ness and pro­tec­tion, increase our tech­ni­cal capac­i­ty, and devel­op the human cap­i­tal we need as we look to the future.” 

Cyber threats include a range of sources, he said, from nui­sance hack­ers and cyber­crime to denial of ser­vices and poten­tial­ly destruc­tive activ­i­ties. “Our great­est chal­lenge in cyber­space is to improve our abil­i­ty to oper­ate and defend the DOD net­work at net­work speed,” Kehler said, “and to make sure our crit­i­cal activ­i­ties can con­tin­ue, even in the face of adver­sary attempts to deny or dis­rupt them.” 

In every one of those cas­es as the roles of gov­ern­ment, Defense Depart­ment and indus­try are defined, the top issue is “mak­ing sure we’ve put in place the right rela­tion­ships, the right roles and respon­si­bil­i­ties and in some cas­es mak­ing sure we have the right author­i­ties in place so that we can act at what our cyber experts would call net­work speed, which is a very tough chal­lenge for us,” Kehler said. 

The mem­o­ran­dum of agree­ment on cyber­space signed in Octo­ber between the Defense and Home­land Secu­ri­ty depart­ments, the gen­er­al added, is “a very, very good start.” The next steps include improv­ing sit­u­a­tion­al cyber aware­ness among the com­bat­ant com­mands and into the pub­lic domain, he added. 

Strat­com also must recruit and retain the best cyber experts and resolve the ques­tion of author­i­ties, Kehler said, “so we have prop­er­ly sort­ed out this bal­ance between our con­sti­tu­tion­al pro­tec­tions and our need to act on behalf of the nation, with the appro­pri­ate civ­il author­i­ties in the lead.” 

Kehler said the ser­vices are help­ing to bol­ster cyber recruit­ment, and he not­ed that at least one ser­vice has put cyber aware­ness train­ing into place from basic train­ing on up. “Almost like every Marine is a rifle­man [and] every sailor is a fire­fight­er, every ser­vice mem­ber, cer­tain­ly every air­man, … is going to be a cyber defend­er,” he said. 

Anoth­er front for Strat­com, Kehler said, is the phased, adap­tive approach for mis­sile defense in Europe. Mis­sile defense for the Unit­ed States has been based on two major objec­tives, he said. 

“Objec­tive No. 1 has been to make sure that our home­land is pro­tect­ed against a lim­it­ed bal­lis­tic-mis­sile attack from North Korea and to extend that if events war­rant and Iran devel­ops sim­i­lar capac­i­ty,” he said. 

The sec­ond objec­tive that has emerged, Kehler said, has been to ensure Strat­com is respond­ing to rapid­ly grow­ing region­al threats. The phased, adap­tive approach is intend­ed to put resources into the com­bat­ant com­mand the­aters to bol­ster the defens­es of U.S. troops and allies in such a way that is adapt­able to the threat, he said. 

“I sup­port that,” he added. “I think that’s the right way to go forward.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →