Success Hinges on Afghan Forces, Gates Says

WASHINGTON, Dec. 16, 2010 — Con­di­tions are in place for coali­tion forces to achieve their goals in Afghanistan, but whether achieve­ments can be sus­tained long-term will depend on the Afghans, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates said today.

“The key to our suc­cess is the con­tin­ued expan­sion of the Afghan secu­ri­ty forces,” Gates told reporters today dur­ing a White House news brief­ing on the one-year review of Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s strat­e­gy plan in Afghanistan. A five-page sum­ma­ry of the clas­si­fied review was made pub­lic today. 

“As the Afghans increase their capa­bil­i­ties, we can move in the more chal­leng­ing parts of the coun­try,” Gates said. One of the goals of the mil­i­tary strat­e­gy is to halt Tal­iban gains and reverse their momen­tum, while simul­ta­ne­ous­ly build­ing Afghan forces to take the lead against a weak­ened insur­gency, he added. 

No one knows now what secu­ri­ty in the coun­try will look like in July when Oba­ma plans to begin draw­ing down troops, Gates said, but the right met­rics are in place to ascer­tain if the goals are being met. 

The mil­i­tary cam­paign in Mar­ja, in south­ern Afghanistan’s Hel­mand province, “has tak­en longer and been sig­nif­i­cant­ly more dif­fi­cult” than lead­ers expect­ed, Gates said. How­ev­er, he added, the coalition’s gains there have been so sig­nif­i­cant that secu­ri­ty there is on tar­get to tran­si­tion to Afghan forces. 

Coali­tion forces con­tin­ue to focus on Afghanistan’s bor­der with Pak­istan and are mak­ing gains there against the insur­gency, the sec­re­tary said. “They don’t have a free pass at this point,” he said. “There is a lot of kinet­ic action tak­ing place on that border.” 

The coalition’s increas­ing­ly strong part­ner­ship with Pak­istan is crit­i­cal to efforts to dis­man­tle al-Qai­da, Gates said. “The Pak­ista­nis are the meat in the sand­wich,” he said. “Every­body knows that fail­ing to deal with the safe havens [in Pak­istan] pos­es a real chal­lenge. But I would argue that we are deal­ing with those safe havens.” 

Gates said the review should be looked at broad­ly as to whether the administration’s strat­e­gy is work­ing. “The whole pur­pose of this review was not to relit­i­gate the whole strat­e­gy,” he said, “but to say, ‘How’s it going?’ ” The review also will help to improve those areas that con­tin­ue to be a chal­lenge, he added. 

The review is impor­tant in help­ing lead­ers from becom­ing too ambi­tious about Afghanistan and to pin­point those areas where the coali­tion can be effec­tive, Gates said. 

“The key here is to iden­ti­fy our objec­tives care­ful­ly,” he said, not­ing that the review and its met­rics help lead­ers know what they have to do to turn over secu­ri­ty to the Afghans with U.S. forces in the background. 

“Our goal is not in build­ing a 21st cen­tu­ry Afghanistan,” he said. “Our goal is not in rid­ding the coun­try of all cor­rup­tion, which would be unique in the region. Our goal is to turn back the Tal­iban” so the Afghan gov­ern­ment can take over. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →