Stavridis: NATO Summit Results ‘Excellent’

WASHINGTON, Nov. 24, 2010 — The recent NATO sum­mit enhanced the organization’s inter­ac­tion with Rus­sia and the strate­gic part­ner­ship with Afghanistan as well as fur­ther­ing progress on Euro­pean mis­sile defense, the top U.S. mil­i­tary com­man­der in Europe said here today.
Navy Adm. James G. Stavridis, com­man­der of U.S. Euro­pean com­mand and NATO supreme allied com­man­der, Europe, deliv­ered a brief­ing at the Wash­ing­ton For­eign Press Cen­ter and respond­ed to reporters’ ques­tions on the Nov. 19 and 20 NATO sum­mit held in Lis­bon, Por­tu­gal.

The summit’s three pri­ma­ry top­ics were the deliv­ery of the new strate­gic con­cept and its appli­ca­tions to cyberde­fense and mis­sile defense; NATO-Rus­sia inter­ac­tion at the NATO-Rus­sia Coun­cil; and the tran­si­tion of secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty in Afghanistan, Stavridis said.

The gath­er­ing addressed Afghanistan “not just as NATO but as [the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force],” the admi­ral said, “which is a coali­tion of 48 coun­tries, the 28 NATO coun­tries and 20 addi­tion­al.”

The Afghanistan dis­cus­sion focused prin­ci­pal­ly on tran­si­tion, “which will begin 2011, con­tin­ue through 2014, Pres­i­dent [Hamid] Karzai’s stat­ed goal of com­ple­tion of tran­si­tion to Afghan-led oper­a­tions,” he said.

It also focused on longer-term strate­gic part­ner­ships between Afghanistan and NATO’s Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force, Stavridis said, in line with NATO’s new strate­gic con­cept com­mit­ting the alliance to become more agile, more capa­ble and more effec­tive.

The NATO-ISAF “com­pre­hen­sive approach” to oper­a­tions in Afghanistan aims to bring togeth­er eco­nom­ic, polit­i­cal, mil­i­tary and devel­op­men­tal capa­bil­i­ties dur­ing the tran­si­tion phase in that coun­try, he said.

“That [approach] is high­light­ed in the strate­gic con­cept,” the admi­ral said.

As the secu­ri­ty tran­si­tion unfolds, Stavridis said, ISAF forces will take an “in togeth­er, out togeth­er” approach as they have done and still do in Koso­vo.

“We have come down from a total of over 50,000 NATO troops in the Balka­ns at one time, down to … 10,000 last year, and I’ve just autho­rized a reduc­tion to 5,000 NATO troops in Koso­vo,” Stavridis said. “As we do that, the allies are leav­ing pro­por­tion­al to the size of the troop strength that is there.”

He said the same con­cept “will deter­mine how we begin with­draw­ing troops [from Afghanistan] as the tran­si­tion unfolds from 2011 for­ward to the com­ple­tion that we all look for in 2014.”

The supreme allied com­man­der said the NATO’s strate­gic con­cept also “put a strong mark­er down” on focus­ing addi­tion­al resources and work on cyberde­fense and on bal­lis­tic mis­sile defense.

“We talked a lit­tle bit about how the alliance will hook into the U.S. for [mis­sile defense] phased adap­tive approach in the time to come,” he said. “We made a com­mit­ment at Lis­bon that, as an alliance, we would move for­ward with that inte­gra­tion.”

The phased approach, Stavridis said, will over time inte­grate U.S. mis­sile defense capa­bil­i­ties with NATO com­mand and con­trol sys­tems, he said.

“I’m quite con­fi­dent we’ll be able to sur­mount the tech­ni­cal chal­lenges as we go for­ward,” the admi­ral said.

NATO’s strate­gic con­cept focus­es the alliance on part­ner­ships, Stavridis said.

“Here I would high­light … strate­gic part­ner­ship with Rus­sia,” he said. “Pres­i­dent [Dmit­ry] Medvedev’s par­tic­i­pa­tion was note­wor­thy, and we talked about work­ing togeth­er on ter­ror­ism, pira­cy, nar­cotics, Afghanistan, mis­sile defense. And I felt a very pos­i­tive atmos­phere in terms of NATO-Rus­sia strate­gic part­ner­ship.”

The NATO com­man­der clar­i­fied that Russ­ian sup­port to ISAF and Afghanistan would not include Russ­ian mil­i­tary oper­a­tions there.

“What we are talk­ing about is Russ­ian sup­port to ISAF, and I’ll give you some con­crete exam­ples: addi­tion­al sup­port on the logis­tics flow through our dis­tri­b­u­tion net­works; help­ing by sell­ing Mi-17 heli­copters to Afghanistan; per­haps doing some train­ing in Rus­sia for Afghans, if this is some­thing that would be of inter­est to the Afghan gov­ern­ment,” Stavridis said.

The sum­mit also addressed NATO reform, “try­ing to find more effi­cien­cies in the struc­ture for NATO oper­a­tional com­mand,” he said. The NATO com­mand struc­ture cur­rent­ly has “about 12 head­quar­ters and … about 13,000 total peo­ple,” Stavridis said, which the orga­ni­za­tion will trim to approx­i­mate­ly sev­en head­quar­ters and just under 9,000 peo­ple.

“As we do that, we’re going to reori­ent the num­ber of com­mands. No deci­sions have been made as yet as to which indi­vid­ual com­mands will be clos­ing,” he said. Over­all, Stavridis said, the sum­mit was very pro­duc­tive.

“It was per­fect. It was real­ly extreme­ly well orga­nized, extreme­ly well done,” he said. “An excel­lent sum­mit, from my view­point.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →